Report; Zionist rape cult exposed

This false claim could be convincing if you didn't endlessly chant hatred against Semites, such as comparing arabamericannews.com to the KKK. Why does Israel require its followers to hate Semites?

The proof is that many Zionists endlessly and unconditionally bombard Semites with racist hatred, as demonstrated with your writings. Take, for example, that you'd rather honor the murder of "Palsquatters" than to recognize and accept both the nations of Palestine and Israel. The "crap" is thus the racist elements of Zionism, not with the hated Semites that you endlessly insult.

 

(*)(*)(*)(*)! Are you for real? ONE MORE TIME; Its your brainwashed mind that tells you I hate anyone. I have repeatedly told you I do not hate the Palsquatters or anyone else. I gave you examples of the difference between hating someone but not condoning their world view or actions! I have told you either support your slanderous claims (by full quotes of me saying I hate the Palsquatters but guess what? You can’t do it because I have not said I hate them, you say I said I hate them. Wake up and go by what I say instead of what YOU think I say!!! Or shut up. Go unwash your brain! Ha ha its dirty with propaganda and is clogging your ability to think critically.

BTW, the Semites could be a number of people. I wish you would learn to use correct words to describe what you are talking about as well.

reva

 

If you do not hate the Semites, then why do you reject their right to live in their native homeland while accusing all of the hated Semites in America of being KKK? Much of Zionism appears to be heavily racist. Zionism is the Semite-hater of post-Nazi.

 

Sentences like this boggle the mind. Hate, semite, nazi and zionism all in 6 words. Just up your alley.

 

What is really mind-boggleing, is that you'd rather support and defend those who hate Semites than to oppose racism, as demonstrated here.

Thus, why is it, in your view, a holy honor for Zionist to hate Semites? Why do you believe that the hatred of Semites is so sacred that its practice must be heavily defended, as demonstrated with the nature of your criticism? You'll never oppose one who hates Arab Semites, yet as soon as anyone criticizes racism, you utter great protest. Why must much of Zionism be heavily racist against Semites in the post-Nazi era? Why is your worst enemy the critic of racism? Did you never wonder why Breivik feld that he was honoring Zionism by murdering liberals to "save" Europe from the Arab Semite "threat"?

 

I have not supported anyone here. I just find your logic confusing and that does not help your argument against racism against palestinians. As soon as someone makes a disparaging remark about them, you confuse the issue with your " why do you hate the hated semites" jargon and then "zionism is a racist view which labels the hated semites as worth of hating...". Know what I mean? Why? I still do not know.

Racism is wrong without the wierd terms that you cook up.

This is where you lose us.

 

Then why don't you raise your voice in protest against all of the racism being expressed here? You only seem to express protest when someone criticizes racism.

The racism that you refuse to protest is confusing. Why don't you want to protest it?

So, you are terribly disgusted when people protest racism, but you have no issue with people who spew hatred against Semites. If you don't want for many Zionists to demonstrate that they are heavily racist, then why don't you request that they change their views?

If you really think that racism is wrong, then why do you refuse to raise your voice against it? You are quick and eager to protest when people condemn racism, and you are always silently supportive when people bombard Semites with racist hatred.

Why is it thus so very illegal for you to oppose the hatred of Semites? All that you are doing is to further demonstrate that Zionism is obligated to be heavily racist against Semites in the post-Nazi era.

 

Then, it is a good time to begin demonstrating such. It is rather difficult to prove that one is opposed to racism by not criticizing its practice. Yet, then again, which Zionst has ever opposed racism? Any? Certainly not you.

Because the alternate to such is hating Semites, a behavior many Zionists are infamous of practicing.

I see that you are still relying heavily on unproven personal attacks to oppose the criticism of racism. Next time, try using facts to prove that the hatred of Semites is the great honor many Zionist like to think it of being.

 

Yes, unlike most on the site, I can see that this is not a black and white issue and it is these uncompromising fronts and claims that the other side is the problem/racist/idiot/thief, which actually mirror the very issues that the conflict faces. This is a microcosm of what is going wrong in the middle east.

Judge is playing a role too, claiming not to.

His terminology though leaves me baffled.

 

I am not a zionist. As usual your conclusions pertain to "many Zionists" - which is a foolish generalisation in of itself - without listening to the individual and seeing the grey areas.
I see Israel as a reality; as I see the Palestinians as a reality. But your harping on about anti-semite hatred - which you claim is only one sided - is disingenious and adds fuel to the fire. Why not just acknowledge that the hatred and animosity goes both ways and be done with it?
Sometimes it is like watching my kids fight.

 

Your arguments are very similar to those made by many Zionists and so there is nothing foolish about recognizing such.

Again, why are you so terribly disgusted when people oppose the hatred of Semites? The hatred of Semites is a common Zionist problem which you seem to be defensive of.

Link please. Where have I made such a claim? Only in your imagination.

I've never stated otherwise, so what is preventing you from criticizing both sides? There are thousands of posts here where some Zionists are blasting Semites with extreme racist hatred, and you appear to be terribly disgusted with the criticism of such. Some Jews and Arabs who post here are fairly critical of both sides and I don't have any issue with their writings, nor do they protest mine. So, what is preventing you from criticizing both sides? Why do you make a major fuss when racism is criticized?

 

Sorry Liebe, but I share the judge's impression. I hope you don't show as much bias when sorting out fights between your kids and don't only tell off one while letting the little brat that schmoozes you the most off the hook when it calls the other "Mr. Nuke Israel".

 

Link please. It is easy to invent false claims about those who criticize the racism one loves and supports, but can you back such with evidence? Nope.

Sure, and thus you have no issue with words of racism expressed against hated Semites. With your platform, it is holy to defend racism and illegal to support the criticism of such.

 

The Judge correctly identifies the driving force behind Middle East racism- Zionism. Zionism is a doctrine of the ethnic cleansing of arabs , arabs correctly identified as Semitic people by Judge. NeoZionism is, of course, a post-Nazism form of the original , racist, Zionist concept. Zionism was actually recognized as racist by the United Nations in 1975.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_3379
So, how do you justify your silly attack on Judge ?

 

There is not attack and I am sure he can defend himself or explain himself, which would be more appropriate.

If you read my post you would see that I object to the inferences he makes in relation to statements here. See his chain of thinking beautifully illustrated for you, by moi, above. Inferences are merely that. Kind of like assuming that an idelogoy is rapist because individuals are. Equally ludicrous and no different to the racism you claim to despise.

Any generalisations are merely that. All are racist.

All zionists are not racist.

All muslims are not terrorists.

These are both sides of the same coin.

 

I never stated that all Zionists are racists, but rather that Zionism is the Semite-hater of post-Nazi. This is a response to the strong amount of racism which seems to come from Zionism these days that you don't want to oppose. Thus, if you want for Zionism to change its image for the better, then oppose its heavily racist elements. Your criticism is what can make Zionism better, not the unconditional defense of its racist problems. Why do you not want to oppose the racist problems of Zionism? If more people like you criticized Zionism, then it would not have the image of being Semite-hating in the post-Nazi era.

 

I disagree. Zionism is based upon the ethnic cleansing of arabs from Palestine. How could any follower of such a brutal doctrine be anything other than racist ?

 

This is where I stopped reading. Why? Because until you are me or you can prove that I am heavily supportive of "Talon's personal attacks and false claims" and you are able to show how I even "love" them, kindly do not expect me to prove another poster's points, would ya?

Much obliged.

 

Well what is a zionist? I have yet to see evidence that everyone who believes that Israel has a right to exist is racist. Like others on the forum I believe it has a right to exist although I am against the occupation and settlements. Is that racist? Is that a zionist? Please put me in a box in this world of black or white.

 

Was the All-India Muslim League movement of independance also racist, based on ethnic cleansing of millions of Hindus and Sikhs? The ethnic cleansing here dwarfs anything in Palestine and the region.

 

The crux is that for Israel to exist as a democratic Jewish state it has to have a majority Jewish population. Could that and can it be maintained, without ethnic cleansing of some sort?

 

Well as for most countries who want to retain their character, genocide isn't the answer. Limits on emigration are! It is like saying the crux is that for France to remain French it has to believe in ethnic cleansing. Does it murder everyone who is not French?

Plus I read here all the time that the Palestinian population is growing and growing. How does that fit in with ethnic cleansing? At least my common sense tells me that something is amiss.

I beleive that, as reflected on the site, people do not want a solution. They need the fight.

 

Ah but modern Zionism was founded with the intent to create a state which didn't already exist. That aside In the present situation isn't limiting immigration on the basis of ethnicity, racist? France does not limit immigration on the basis of ethnicity but on nationality. France woul dbe contravening European law if it limited immigration by refusing the right of a German citizen of Arab ethnicity to emigrate from Germany to France.

Ethnic cleansing is still possible by clearing certain territories even though the general population of those being cleared is growing. In other words ethnic cleansing doesn't have to apply to the total population and doesn't have to result in the demise of this population. There was recently a case of ethnic cleansing here in our local Muslim ghetto where people of Greenlandic ethnicity were harassed and threatened to move out and where the authorities actively helped in relocating them. It had nothing to do with population numbers and nobody was killed in fact it all happened very smoothly without even much protest.

 

Again, Zionism is a doctrine of ethnic cleansing based upon the forced removal of arabs from Palestine. The concept of ' a homeland for jews ' is all very well as long as nobody gets forced from their land in order to make room for them. So, you state that you are against the occupation and the ' settlements ' (squats is a far more temporary term ) . Perhaps you'd be kind enough to tell us where the borders are of this ' Israel ' you claim has a right to exist and what has happened to the indigenous people who lived there before your Zionists arrived from Europe.

 

Strange, I was just reading this document and it states the following:

Now, why would these Zionists appeal to the Arab inhabitants of Israel to "participate in the upbuilding of the State" if they were interested in "ethnic cleansing based upon the forced removal of arabs from Palestine", as you claim? Care to point out the passage in that document that substantiates your allegation?