Read up on the architect and the design.. HOW the buildings were constructed and the changes made to increase the height by the Ports Authority. Shouldn't take you more than a week end.
I believe that you are right about the fuel. My information is older than the 2008 report. The debris did start the fire, but didn't directly cause the collapse. Regardless, the cause was fire. Apparently, damage to the sprinkler system sealed the building's fate. Don _
Then why was it that...sorry can't remember who said that tower 7 was sacrificed and imploded. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJgj78MNLms&feature=player_detailpage"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJgj78MNLms&feature=player_detailpage[/ame] If that is not an implosion I don't know what is. Larry Silverstein says so. He said the building was sacrificed. Explain that.
It is a loss of structural support caused by fire. The building does collapse upon itself as you say. A controlled demolition does the same thing in an ordered manner to ensure that debris doesn't hit other buildings. _
No one pays attention to who enters a skyscraper and does what. Here you go, the coincidences and botched investigation compiled in a 5 minute micromachine man video. Not even including 100 more peculiar circumstances and fabrications. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98[/ame]
Oh nonsense.. building management is very aware of who is coming and going to do any sort of repairs or refurbishing... Its also constant in any building of that size.
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/destroyed-in-seconds-flaming-tower-collapse.html This is a partial collapse caused by fire. The surviving internal supports appear to be concrete, which may explain why there was not a total collapse. _
lol...They always seemed to notice me when I walked into buildings. "Can I help you?" "No don't worry me and my 30 buddies are just gonna head downstairs with our bags and cords and stuff, we'll be back later" "Ok take your time".
I have more of a clue than you, Don G. It's called physics, calculus, structural superiority. But, ok, I think everyone should stop calling people who want a new investigation nutters. "Conspiracy theorist crazies" claims are reaching an Orwellian level of ridiculousness. They lie to us, constantly, realize that and hold them accountable. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/09/high-level-officials-eager-to-spill-the-beans-about-what-really-happened-on-911-but-no-one-in-washington-or-the-media-wants-to-hear.html
Strange, I didn't see the twin towers or the 7th tower inflamed like this one was and did not see it pancake like you said it did. After the fire was still smoldering it was still standing.
It was the strawberries. They thought they fooled me, but no, I was too smart for them. Yes that's it, it was the strawberries. -Capt. Queeg, USS Caine.
when are truthers going to realize that a fire in an enclosed space can be much hotter than a fire in the open? Seriously, if a wood fire can get up to 2200 Fahrenheit in a kiln, imagine how hot a jet fuel fire could get inside a similar situation.
My brother told me any interesting story about when his house burned.. They smelled smoke, but when they opened the front door to get out, the place exploded.. The rush of air caused the fire to explode the third floor attic to be suddenly engulfed in flames and collapse onto the second floor.
Please tell me you aren't serious. There doesn't have to be molten steel. There never has to be molten steel. All you have to do is weaken it by raising the temp high enough to cause structural failure. I can't believe there are still people who still believe this garbage.
But well built.. It was a 4 million dollar home. Air feeds every fire. You should LOOK a the design schematic of the towers.. It wasn't brick mortar and steel as you are imagining. It was a light building with an aluminum skin and everything was cantilevered around the central core. I KNEW it would collapse.. and was praying .. Get out Get out..