Are you single? And are you a man? And what is your religion? I believe I have the solution to your problem.
So do you want to hear my solution or not? P.S. The reason why I keep on responding to your posts is because I'm a Democrat.
Answer these 3 questions and I have the solution to your problem. Are you single? And are you a man? And what is your religion?
Is that supposed to have some effect on me? I'm not a Democrat. Or a Republican. I'm a person who isn't tied to a party machine like a turkey. So what I write pisses off both sides or nobody (if that nobody has a modicum of sense.)
Because most rational posters have that one on ignore, probably within 15 minutes of joining the forum.
Another disclaimer; I love my MODERATE Islamic/Muslim friends. However the radical Muslim terrorists have nearly destroyed the Islam's image and religion, and are a threat to all humanity and should be dealt with where ever we find them. What are you talking about? Are you ignorant of your own movements (Islamic religions) history? I was saying that Israel and those that love Israel (the 1095 quip was the date of the first CHRISTIAN crusade to rescue Jerusalem from the infidel Islamic invaders) have been here for centuries and we will be here (on earth) forever. Hopefully we can live in peace together. Rev A
Hmmm why are you lying to me? Moon has never crossed any line into anti-semitic canards. If you think its more than criticism then prove it - just ask them what solution they prefer in palestine. Go on do it. I think youll find Marlowe doesnt want any jews pusehd into the sea. As for the amounts posted - that charge is undermined by the simple fact that you do the same - you are constantly involved in middle eastern threads. Does that make you an antii arab bigot or something? No, therefore youre charge is both vague and baseless. Much like telling someone constantly posting against Obama that he's crossed a line rather than than just having a keen interest in the subject. As for this crap about 1% defending terrorism etc etc, since you wont even defend that crap I neednt respond here. Eh? When was this great victory? As far as Ive seen youve never stayed in a debate on these matters. Youve certainly never bested me or anyone here on some matter of history lets say who started the 67 for example. Do you really think youve won? I suggest to really be sure we should all enter a formal debate on, lets say anti-zionism = anti- semitism. What do you say? This is a subject thats close to your heart obviously so you should be able to make persuasive argument in great ease and win the day without contest.
MURDER you ? - Nah ! at least not before Christmas. , . While I might disagree with much of what you've got to say , I won't go as far as Voltaire , to defend your right to say it - "to the death" btw - wouldnt you rather prefer flying a Israeli flag ? ...
LOL, that's a no-brainer, they are quite frank about it. Any solution that does not leave Israel as a Jewish-majority state in the middle-east, any solution which will replace a tiny jewish state with a 24th arab state. The pushing into the sea part usually comes next, when Jews are a minority. Do you think their spin and rhetoric is fooling anyone? Their objectives are quite obvious - no Israel. I don't dispute that I do the same, you disputed the fact that they are obsessed with Israel. And there is another subtle difference. I am pro-Israel so calling me an arab bigot is inaccurate. They are anti-Israel and calling them Israel haters is fully justified. LOL, straw man much? Who fired the first bullet in 1967 has never been disputed. The fact that the arabs closed the Straits (an act of war), kicked out the peace keepers (violation of the armistice agreement restoring the pre-agreement de-jure state of war) and massed troops, tanks, artillery etc on all Israeli borders demonstrates that Israel had every legal right for a pre-emptive attack. The fact that there were no anti-Israel UN resolutions or any other legal consequences also confirmed that Israel's actions were legal and legitimate...your and your camp's understanding of international law notwithstanding. The fact that Israel immediately accepted UNSC land for peace resolution and the arab world responded with the infamous 'no peace, no recognition and no negotiations with Israel' also demonstrated quite well who wanted peace and who wanted to wipe a neighbor off the map.
The drunken Reverend/ Christian Zionist - is apparently unaware that the First Crusade smaked off wholesale slaughter of Jews . "The preaching of the First Crusade inspired an outbreak of anti-Jewish violence. In parts of France and Germany, Jews were perceived as just as much an enemy as Muslims: they were held responsible for the crucifixion, and they were more immediately visible than the distant Muslims. Many people wondered why they should travel thousands of miles to fight non-believers when there were already non-believers closer to home ... ...
We can't forget the 1973 Yom Kippur war. All this obsession with '67 completely ignores the failed Arab surprise attack in a great and holy sin to both religions by making war on Yom Kippur during Ramadan. The Arabs lost, then tried to steal back what they lost and lost again. History has rendered it's verdict. The Palestinians need to just move somewhere because they will always be doomed to live like rats.