Did investigators consider the possibility that an explosion caused or contributed to the collapse of WTC 7? Yes, this possibility was...
what you are describing (badly) is the law of probabilities.... your version only works if you can prove a CD ..
you've already been told how to find the date and even who photographed "said person" beside the pic itself screams world trade center ,you know...
APPEARS TO BE .... do you say that to your wife or girlfriend /boyfriend ,children? how often?
so a truther blogger and a truther site.? try this : http://www.911myths.com/html/stratesec.html
here is the steel in question [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] the first two images prove that a torch or plasma cutter were used the melted steel drops...
marvin bush was a raging ass hat besides being dead. not the mysterious death ploy again...
all of those statement are false. a. wtc7 collapsed leaving a huge pile of debris so your use of the phrase total destruction is a misnomer (...
really? how did "they" pull that off ?
your point? This analysis showed that the 40 percent longer descent time—compared to the 3.9 second free fall time—was due primarily...
gremlins?
false! part of the north face of wtc7 fell for 2.25 sec not the whole structure. In a video, it appears that WTC 7 is descending in free...
no....it proves just the opposite, randomness if the government was really trying to do ,the as yet unexplained reason for destroying the wtc...
so all the survivors from the stair case are in on it?
false.. there is no reliable corroborateable facts or evidence that "the attacks" were propagated by the government. that's a fantasy folks...
Separate names with a comma.
