You just made my point for me! His lawsuit rate is an order of magnitude higher than others. A large number were also initiated by him
Well I finally found the paper and it will take me time for a full review but I already have questions regarding methodology for inclusion
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778821007635 Hmmm some holes in that paper
Thank-you now we both have the same reference. So your point again was?
They are still dead whereas the chance of them dying without the gun being there is much much lower since the vast majority are spur of the moment...
66 versus over 4,000?? You tell me
Which was not supported by either a link or a citation
I gather those 116 studies were not part of a systematic review?
Wow! Easy Peasy! Gun securement and no “substitution effect” does not come into play
Deleted
It is an attempt to win back voters lost to the abortion issue and quite frankly don’t think it will work
Separate names with a comma.
