Ron Paul: Sexual harassment victims bear responsibility for resolution

No, it exists, in part, to protect me and I expect it to.

 

Cops rob people on the streets and in their own homes via moronic idiotic (*)(*)(*)(*)ing retarded cruel purely greedy immoral evil disgusting vile..drug wars, absurd regulations, punishing taxes, etc.

And oh yeah, Paul doesn't support artificial inflation and legal mass-counterfeiting caused by Big Banking.

ok, but that's not as bad as economically retarded candidates which are running against him. I don't care about people that can't grow balls at work as much as I care about my economic prosperity. Period.

 

My goodness! Where is this happening? And I wasn't aware that the police levied taxes.

No, Paul supports the victims of sexual harassment quitting their jobs.

How would the federal government enforcing sexual harassment laws in the workplace in any way affect your prosperity?

 

I don't care whether it would or not. The ONLY important information here is that unlike all the other candidates that are currently running, Paul doesn't support the thieving police state and central banking. That makes him 10 times better than all of them even if he supported people being raped. I don't care about them. I care about ME and MY FINANCIAL success.

There. Is that through your thick skull? I could just be wishy washy and try to convince you that Paul is better for everyone, but I don't give a flying (*)(*)(*)(*) if he is or not. I care about ME. NOT YOU. (*)(*)(*)(*) YOU. OK????

 

filler post

 

I hope I make ememies with every single poster on this forum

 

Define sexual harassment. When Ron Paul was asked about this, he brought up the example of someone telling a rude joke and that becoming the impetus for a lawsuit. That's the problem with sloppy language. But by all means, continue to bash one candidate you have a vendetta against for some reason while not bothering to explain how you can support whatever aspiring despot you want to vote for.

 

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sexual+harassment

I find Ron Paul's suggestion that the victim's of sexual harassment are somehow partially to blame and that they should remedy the situation by quitting their jobs is at best imbecilic.

 

Judicial powers isn't about "more serious matters" or "less serious matters." It is about jurisdiction. Sexual harrassment can either be state or federal, but still be just as serious in either case. If you look at this case: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore, you will see that it is a very serious matter.

BTW, karma rarely takes care of people who act like ducks, just look at Bill Clinton or Clarence Thomas as examples.

 

He is blaming the individual along with Society itself that takes offensive jokes too seriously and Society itself is trying to make us all "PC".

 

Why, you disagree? You think if you get sick you have a right to my money? You think the government should decide what is NSFW?

 

It exists to execute certain enumerated powers, none of which include regulating the office place or policing harassment. Those are the purview of individuals and state and local governments. Maybe if you weren't so obsessed with smearing Ron Paul (do you do anything else here?), you'd realize that a great many of the things he says have a basis in Constitutional law and American political philosophy.

 

I love it. You cry about some petty office harassment and then flippantly dismiss the authoritarian and pervasive infringement of rights that is the war on drugs.

Where is it happening, you ask? All over America, of course. Here's one example from Boston:

Grandpa killed in drug raid

Thousands of Americans are assaulted, imprisoned, and killed every year in the prosecution of this vile war on drugs, but that's not important to you. You're more concerned about someone getting their butt pinched at work...

Define "sexual harassment" and then we can have a serious discussion, though I doubt you are capable of such when the discussion concerns your obsession.

By further eroding the constraints that the Constitution has placed on the Federal government.

 

Ron Paul is right herassment should be a state and local matter. Though it is not the fualt of the herassed.

 

I find that if whoever you support had said the same thing he'd said, you wouldn't give a hoot. I find that out of your 25 most recently posted threads, 17 are focused on Ron Paul. That's 68%! By contrast, only 2 have anything to with any other candidates. This is despite the fact you wouldn't undoubtedly argue that Ron Paul "will never win." That is bizarre behavior, yet the typical behavior pattern of Paul-o-phobes.

 

Then you'd be wrong.

Interesting isn't it that those who worship Paul seek to suppress the very Constitutional right that Paul claims to revere. Freedom of speech.

 

Pointing out that the majority of your posts are for a Candidate "that cant win" while you rarely mention a candidate you back is not suppressing your rights. Trolls have the rights to free speech. This forum is a perfect example of this and some probably look to you as a leader of sorts. Congrats.

 

This issue isn't about getting sick or "taking anyone's money." Please, learn about the issue before you post.

 

Please enlighten me on the issue at hand.

I talked about sick people in reference to AIDS being brought up. I was more concerned though about the government deciding what is NSFW.

 

better then killing people