They already do. Collectivists simply love the concept of taxing private assets that have been amassed with already taxed income...LOVE IT! and in January '13, estate taxes are slated to return to 55% of anything over $1 million.
Who's gonna get the free abortions though? the poor. this is a win! that means less poor people. praise the light!
So you support killing the poor? You realize those are democrats you want to kill.... Right? Lets ask an expert on the subject... [video=youtube;93eir00rOho]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93eir00rOho[/video]
The GOP isnt interested in killing the poor, and I dont think that is extreme. Do you support federal tax dollars being used to slaughter the innocent as the democrat platform clearly dictates?
What part of the platform said federal dollars would pay? What about the child of rape? Sexual abuse?
You need to read the OP so you know what your typing about. Rape victums make up 2% of all abortions, dont muddle the issue with willful lies and deception.
ah yes another liberal who supports violations of the law for the sake of Free Stuff.... We need to abort the democrat party.
It is not their portion, though. The US federal government jacks my pay so that other people may benefit. How did the Iraq war benefit me? How do military bases in Germany benefit me? How about the far east? I don't get food stamps. I don't get free health care. I just pay for other people to do so in the most ridiculously inefficient way possible. Again, the government takes federal income tax for what purpose that benefits me? Does their portion pay my local police? No. How about the public schools in my district? Why are they better schools than the ones upstate? Because they are paid through local tax. Income tax is theft.
See, now you're thinking like Margaret Sanger,the founder of Planned Parenthood, who's goal was less poor and minorities.
Man.... It's a full fledged meltdown at the DNC. Now free abortions for all?....lol. I guess the taxpayers will pick up that tab????? And let me guess, Planned Parenthood will get even more funding for "not providing abortions with taxpayer dollars"?.....lmao!!!!! The official party of killing babies!!! Stand proud and be loud Democrats!!! You own it now!
Sanger's goal was ALWAYS "less suffering for the poor large families who couldn't take care of all the children they had. Of ANY race.
Oh quite the contrary. If a woman gets preggers then she has a choice. The man is on the hook from conception, with no choice. He can pony up the support dough for a few decades or go to jail....nice....maybe these abortion laws should include an "Opt out" choice for the father just to keep things "Equal" and all. That way the man and the woman have a choice.
FYI, in order to get public funds for an abortion, the Henry Hyde Amendment must be overturned. Otherwise this is a non issue.
false, obamacare makes it mandatory for insurance carriers to cover it. If they cant pay for insurance Obamacare covers it, and the tax payers get the bill.
Take your pick. More orphans or more abortions. In most cases, you end up paying for one or the other. Granted, I guess you could end all public funding to orphanages, but then you'd have quite a homeless problem.
Hmmmmm - I would like to see the source of this and not just some report. See the PROCEDURE that can be used for abortion is used for partial miscarriage - where the baby has died and but it either has not been expelled fully or has only partially been expelled.
I am sorry but isn't an abortion an "opt out" for the father as well??? If the woman does choose to have the child SHE does not then have an "opt out". That child needs support and if she takes off and leaves the father to raise the child does she not face the same demands for support?
No it isn't an "Opt out" for the father if he has no say in the decision. He is on the hook for quite a while like it or not.
It's Margaret Sanger. And in case the *******s don't know who she is, her ideas are what the Nazis fashioned the final solution on.