Dr Wood's claim that 80% of the steel from the towers was turned to dust.

So cease with the propaganda and show some evidence.

 

You think the physical properties of iron are a propaganda lesson?

 

Are you actually suggesting that some kind of disintegration ray knocked down the Twin Towers?

I also like how you say in your previous post that nobody can refute Dr Wood's book, yet on your tagline, you talk about Jim Fetzer and Richard Gage refuting her book.

Thank you so much for the laughs.

 

The truth is always seen as propaganda by those like truthers who would simultaneously complicate and simplify everything.

 

The reality Dr. Judy Wood presents makes voting in the Presidential race an act of futility.
Vote all you want, it won't change the direction of the ship we are all on.
​

Where Did The Twin Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free Energy Technology
Dr. Judy Wood joins It's Rainmaking Time! to share the First Comprehensive Forensic Probe into what really happened to the twin towers and the surrounding destruction on 9/11 in a way that reveals why the story we were told is literally impossible and appears to violate the laws of physics.

New York, NY (PRWEB) September 11, 2012

The best way to honor the dead and the families who lost loved ones at the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, a terrible day that changed the world, is to resolve the first question which was not thoroughly addressed.

Dr. Judy Wood, author of "Where Did The Towers Go", structural engineer and forensic scientist who spent 10 years examining empirical evidence rather than being lured into political focus or conspiracy theories brings us findings that are nothing short of mind blowing.

In the recent interview with Kim Greenhouse of It's Rainmaking Time!, on 9/11 the twin towers turned to dust faster than if they had fallen. 7, (not 3) buildings were destroyed along with 1,400 cars, some up 7 blocks away from Ground Zero. Over 1,000 people were literally launched out of the twin towers before descending to their deaths. Some bodies were even reported to explode on the way down from the buildings.

New York Police Department Aviation Unit Detective Greg Semendinger, who was in a police helicopter that morning, witnessed the second plane strike the tower from the air and took many photographs. He told the AP that, "There was no sound whatsoever, just the noise of the radio and the helicopter" (Newsday Feb. 10, 2010). 1 million tons of steel, concrete, and building contents turned to dust and fell to the ground and you can't hear anything? How would you explain this?

Dr. Wood's blockbuster book "Where Did The Towers Go", a 500 page labor of love, totally addresses the forensic facts of what happened, why the story of what happened that day does not match the real physics involved and why it's so important that we let the evidence lead to the conclusions and not let the conclusions color the evidence.

If you want to meet a modern day "Colombo" in female form who leaves no stone unturned, who sacrificed 10 years of her life to bring you empirical evidence, tune in to It's Rainmaking Time! and read her book, "Where Did The Towers Go?"

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/9/prweb9875176.htm

I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message
​

 

'Blockbuster book'?.....oh brother, crazy judy couldn't have a blockbuster if you strapped a JDAM to her keister...

 

A Real 9-11 Probe: Dr. Judy Wood On 'When Worlds Collide' radio show with Mark Anderson Monday night, 9-11 PM, 9/17/12

Free speech is golden on Mark Anderson’s his weekly radio show, “When Worlds Collide.” And on Monday, Sept. 17 that will be fully displayed when he welcomes Dr. Judy Wood on the show for both hours, from 9 to 11 p.m. Eastern time, at http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/

Dr. Wood, more than anyone else, has comprehensively examined all the evidence at ground zero in New York City regarding what really happened on 9-11-01.

Interestingly, however, Dr. Wood’s analysis seriously challenges both the government’s “gravity-pancake” story of what happened on 9-11, as well as the theories of most of those in the 9-11 truth movement. This position has not been easy for Dr. Wood.

Amid a “truth” movement that seems largely paralyzed in terms of determining, in an unassailable manner, what actually happened to the World Trade Center on 9-11—and especially regarding how to overcome official folklore to launch a genuine investigation—Dr. Wood, agree with her or not, has managed to avoid jumping to sweeping conclusions, as she tries her best to maintain her objectivity and simply go where the evidence leads her.

And the evidence takes you on an unexpected course, where you will be challenged to reexamine your beliefs about 9-11.

Anderson’s interview of Dr. Wood will serve as an overview of her painstakingly detailed book, Where Did the Towers Go?, which documents considerable evidence of something far different being unleashed on lower Manhattan on that pivotal day, which utterly destroyed the World Trade Center.

Tune in to hear this unsettling and highly interesting look at the 9-11 attacks that is a major departure from what you will hear in all other circles.

Mark Anderson
A self-taught reporter from the world of conventional journalism, Mark Anderson, 47, a native of southwest Michigan, started reporting in 1984 for the weekly Berrien County Record, the county's oldest newspaper. He covered local government and wrote some state and national news and commentary while also covering sports and community events, including photography. He went on to become a correspondent and special sections editor for the daily South Bend (Indiana) Tribune until 1996. In the 1990s his research proved that there's more than meets the eye in America's power structure. In response, he unsuccessfully ran for state representative in Michigan in 1996, after which he worked for the Record again, and then the weekly Harbor Country News in Michigan and its daily sibling, the Michigan City (Indiana) News-Dispatch. In those years he wrote more investigative pieces and hard-hitting commentary about local, state and national affairs. From 2002 to 2005 he co-published a quarterly, the Herald Republic, with a partner, circulating it in eight counties. During that time, American Free Press began to publish his articles. After a spell of ill health, he joined AFP officially as a national correspondent in early 2007. He travels for AFP for on-the-scene reports and promotional assignments. For AFP he writes Across the Nation, an ongoing series of reports on various key topics and how Americans are trying to defend, and regain control of, their nation. His commentaries, The Big Picture and Probing the Media, also run in AFP.

Mark, who has a teen-age son from a previous marriage, remarried in April 2007. He and his wife, Angie, a part-time school teacher, reside in south Texas while also spending time in Michigan. He also is a longtime musician, having played drums since the age of 8, along with singing and songwriting.

I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message.
​

 

Revisiting 9/11: Embracing the Facts

Forensic scientist and researcher Dr. Judy Wood, the author of Where Did the Towers Go?, returns for a blockbuster discussion about her 10-year analysis of the September 11th events at the World Trade Center -- and why the official story is impossible according to the laws of physics. Dr. Wood's approach to discovery and critical thinking honors the lives that were lost, and seeks to bring closure to families that lost loved ones on this tragic day in American history. For the first time since 9/11, we will explore the forensic evidence surrounding the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings -- including 1,400 cars, thousands of bodies "falling" out of the buildings, and the "dustification" of the twin towers: how it is that 43,600 windows, 600,000 square feet of glass, 200,000 tons of structured steel, five million square feet of gypsum, six acres of marble, and 425,000 cubic yards of concrete turned to dust.

Eleven years ago, we looked on in horror as these stunning events unfolded -- and many of us are still reeling. Finally, the time has come to consider the empirical data, open our minds, and ask what really happened to the towers that day. Join us as Dr. Judy Wood brings new light and in-depth understanding into the real forensics of 9/11.

[video=youtube_share;jd8gqvVb_l4]http://youtu.be/jd8gqvVb_l4[/video]

I'm Emmanuel Goldstein and I approve this message
​

 

I do not know who started this thread but if we wanted to go down the directed energy road presuming we are talking about radiative energy, there are a few vid clips out there interviewing survivors that the heat sensing fire extinguisher system was set off on floors there were no fires and if one wants to stick with the official "story" on floors that could not have have had enough physical vibration to have effected them. Need some serious g's to break that glass tube.

It does not take a huge stretch of imagination to realize how easy it would be to use resonant fuses, such that a low power directed energy weapon would set off whatever was connected to the fuse. depending on the frequency they could also set off extinguishers on floors with no fire. same as tossing a thermometer in the microwave.

Of course a few mini micro nukes would do the same thing LOL

really simple stuff

 

I totally understand why someone would have a problem figuring this out. We could get a cracker jack team of truther researchers on the case, but then after 11 years we'd still have a lot of disagreement over the actual truth. Some would say there never was a first post, that the thread just gradually evolved over time. There would be the Elvis contingent, but the bickering between the ranks over whether it was an Elvis reanimated by Zionist Illuminati, or if it was alien Elvis would muddy the waters quite a bit. Paid infiltrators would show up and try and claim that the thread was started by a poster named Fangbeer but that's just what they want us to think, isn't it?

I love it when truthers try and get "sciency" Maybe you can answer the question I asked in the original post, Koko?

 

Sure it hurts but stop frothing at the mouth pull your pants back and try again.

 

Pull his pants 'back'?

 

Why was asking once not sufficient for you to at least attempt to answer the question? Dr. Wood claims that 80% of the steel in the tower was turned to dust. Steel is pyrophoric. Why did we not witness the burning of the particulate iron during the period at which Wood claims the steel was "turned to dust?"

Is she trying to claim that a nuclear reaction took place which changed the iron to some other element? That's quite a claim given the fact that iron is among the most stable elements possible. In fact, it takes large amounts of energy to break iron apart, and it takes large amounts of energy to fuse iron into something else. When fusion in a star reaches iron, the energy produced by fusion ceases and the star explodes. Likewise, when a fissile reaction reaches iron, fission stops because no more energy is released to continue the reaction.

If Wood thinks the iron changed into something else, Wood is unwittingly talking about a surreptitious release of energy on the order of the total yearly energy usage of the entire Earth. "A few micro nukes" do not accomplish this. In fact, the smallest nuclear blast ever attempted would have destroyed much of lower Manhattan. The detonation of such a device, and the radiation emitted from such a device, would have been impossible to conceal.

 

What fraud and misinformation.
10 tons isnt even enough to blow my nose LOL
and its been here since the 60's, now the size of golf balls.

People think they understand physics but dont even know how to use google.



In the 1950s and 1960s, the United States developed several different types of lightweight nuclear devices. The main one was the W54, a cylinder 40 by 60 cm (about 16 by 24 inches) that weighed 68 kg (150 lbs). It was fired by a mechanical timer and had a variable yield equivalent to between 10 tons and 1 kiloton of TNT. (Compare: The soldiers might carry 0.05 tons of chemical explosives.) The W54 nuclear device was used in the Davy Crockett Weapon System.


gotta love trougher propaganda spin, and breaking bonds does not automatically suggest or require ignition.

 

You must have one hell of a nose.

Here is what 100 pounds of dynamite does to a house

And you think an explosion 200 times greater is going to be unnoticed?!? BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!! Koko proves once again his claims are drug induced fantasies with no real world basis.

You also haven't addressed the issue of radiation and fallout from the blast. But hey. We know you're still trying to pull the last batch of evidence out of your ass, so take your time trying to respond to this one.

 

yield is a thermal relationship, not how far you can blow lumber across a field, whats the radiation for a pure fusion bomb again?

 

http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/gmap/hydesim.html

15 psi: 0.15 miles
10 psi: 0.19 miles
7 psi: 0.23 miles
5 psi: 0.28 miles
2 psi: 0.49 miles
1 psi: 0.72 miles
0.25 psi: 1.86 miles
0.1 psi: 3.81 miles


Everyone within a quarter of a mile of a 1KT blast would be dead. Buildings within a half a mile of the event would be severely damaged. This is just from the overpressure, not from heat, accelerated debris, or radiation.

The W54 system didn't use different amounts of fuel to achieve it's yield variability. It was able to regulate the way it would fizzle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fizzle_(nuclear_test)

The lower the yield, the larger the amount of fissile material left un reacted. Do you know what that means, Koko? It means radioactive fish in Long Island Sound.

 

FUSION!?!? OMG you've just gone from stupid to the absolutely insane. Pure fusion bombs are still hypothetical at best and require anti matter to ignite them. Just when I think your claims can't POSSIBLY get any more ridiculous, you go and prove me wrong.

 

Wonder if koko realizes you need a fission explosion to detonate the 'fusion' bombs

 

He is talking about "pure fusion bombs" which are theoretical and require antimatter to start the process. Koko never lets little things like the facts get in the way of his fantasies though.

 

Are you kidding? He doesn't know what he's talking about. He's parroting things he saw in a star trek episode, or on other truther websites.

No one who knew what there were talking about would say "its been here since the 60's, now the size of golf balls."

 

97+% aint close enough for ya eh

 

Are you refering to the Tsar Bomba?

 

I dont remember the name

 

Uh huh. It is the most efficient "pure" fusion bomb in existance where 97% of the energy comes from fusion. That what you're talking about?