Google refuses to pull the movie

The issue of importance with us is "a request by the White House on Friday to reconsider its decision to keep online a controversial YouTube movie clip that has ignited anti-American protests in the Middle East."

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

If the video is not illegal under our laws, the "request" of the White House is a violation of his oath of office and he must be impeached immediately.

 

Good.

Yes it is. If you don't like it then go move to Egypt.

Islam is sheer evil. Its facisim disguised as a religion. Its hell bent on world domination, it opprersses women, and inflicts unspeakable violence on anyone who even hints at disagreement with it. Any time Islam is exposed for the true evil that it is, that is a good thing, even if its done via a poorly made movie.

These savages didn't need this film to go on their blood lust. These attacks would have happened on the 9/11 anniversary even if this film had never existed.

Bull crap.

 

well of course they won't pull it! Google is assisting the Muslim Brotherhood, keeping the movie up will give them cover to continue attacking the US. The libs will keep blaming some guy in California for making the movie, Obama and Clinton (whose close aide's daddy is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood) will keep apologizing for our right to free speech and more American soldiers will die...and as everyone knows, to a Lib the only good soldier is a dead one...

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=LS5-oQdvAD4&bpctr=1347719750

It that it? Are you kidding me? It is too stupid to take seriously. There is nothing there that is a violation of our laws.

If the White House did anything official whatsoever, used White House stationary, called from the White House, in requesting Google remove it, or even think about removing it, Obama must be impeached, not removed from office, for sure the Senate is led by quislings, I want to see him go down on election day, but he must be impeached in the house immediately.

 

Do you want to know what the difference is? You actually have to go online and go out of your way to see the Muhammad video.

That elmo was annoying people who had no choice.

 

AIPAC - The Zionist lobby ? international financial elite . ? etc.etc. (wink)

"None are more hopelessly duped/deceived than the deluded who falsely believe they are free."
(apologies to Wolfgang von Goethe)

wink.

 

I'm sure that the opinions of a 18th century historian on people who are non-christian means absolutely nothing in this day and age.

 

Ding Dong. It wasn't a presidential order it was a request. Considering how inflammatory it is, I see nothing wrong in asking.

You are aware that if you don't ask you don't get, aren't you?

 

Judging from the ideology behind the video, it was not produced by Coptic Christians, unless they've joined the sinogog of God's adversary.

 

Been reading Mein Kampf lately? Learning about the feeelthy Jews and their worldwide domination?

 

Asking as a citizen is one thing, he could have done that anonamously, but asking or "requesting" as the President under official stamp is another thing altogether. I think such intimidation might carry more weight.

How many times a day is more inflamatory speech made but backed up by actual quotes of a true Hadith of the False Prophet MoHamMad or verses in his Koran (that are just as offensive to many other beliefs) to prove he was a false prophet.

When the religous beliefs threaten to kill every Homo or Lesbean, because only a blithering idiot thinks the Old Testament doesn't say right there to kill the abominations, the only right we have, the most sacred right we have, is the freedom of speech to denigrate and disrespect such teachings.

This is what President Obama actually said:

The United States of America rejects all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of...those that believe Homos are an abomination before the lord and should be killed for abandoning the natural use of the body.

Do you understand?

The only weapon we have is the right to speak. And for the very reason of right to choose to be Pagan or otherwise we cannot have the boy king's statecraft demeaning our rights of conscience, for the whole world to see, under our constitution.

Where will it stop, will tomorrow this board be requested to remove hundreds of posts because they say MoHamMad was a false prophet, simply because their people are more scary than Idolaters or Pagans...?

Did you see the Hutaree message board after they got arrested, so many pictures of Jesus sucking dick and being butt fracked. Such wonderful displays that fit the verses the Hutaree chose. The simple fact of the matter is the Hutaree respected Jude 1:1-7, because it said what they wanted, but I found it interesting that they stopped at verse 8 which covered their choice to resort to terrorism:

"Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities"

So can we not denigrate the religious beliefs of them, not unless Obama is a Hypocrite.

People get more punishment for an ounce of dope than this President and Secretary of State deserve for their violation of their oaths of office.

It is NOT protecting our constitution for the president or the Secretary of State to threaten our free speech on the world stage, and it not helping the Muslims understand why we allow such speech.

So we have a choice, we can amend the Constitution of the United States and ban any offensive speech against their so-called "Prophet" and their so-called "perfect" Koran, or we can protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Choose now Democrats.

If Congress can say what is a "high crime or misdemeanor" then Congress can say a violation of the oath of office with regard to our most sacred constitutional right is certainly a misdemeanor.

I say he and Clinton needs to be impeached. If for no other reason than to send a strong message to Islam that we are not intimidated, and We the People will not give up our Constitutional rights.

We reserve the right to condemn the movie, in peace, at a time of our choosing and as our individual rights of conscience sees fit.

 

It's so easy to insult under the right of free speach. But they have been financing integrism also waiting for a moment like this. If you want to do something for peace post this wherever is pertinent. I'm tryingo to post it in the youtube films of the matter and won't allow it. They do not respect freedon of speech, but they know how to do it in the hidden: "I respect Islam. Please, don't fall in a calculated provocation. Integrism has been financed for decades spacially by Arabia Saudi families, court of the Royal Saudi family...which happens to be close friends of the Bush. They need war to maintain power and to destroy democracy everywhere. Research for the truth (also in Voltairenet, Laouche, etc): http://www.globalresearch.ca/blasphemy-as-a-political-tactic/".

 

Good for google. It's about time they developed something of a backbone.

Now if only they'd stand up to third party people proclaiming copyright infringement.

 

Google are a bunch of liberal lefty extremists. They have some sinister reason for not pulling the video. They are being to cute by half for some reason I haven't quite figured out yet.

 

Turns out the president didn't have anything to do with any request in picking up the convicted felon who had a very public parole violation.
Free speech is not compromised in any way shape or form, as Google has demonstrated.

You have completely misinterpreted the situtation. Just like ol Mitty, going off half cocked without being in full command of the facts. At least your rant isn't sending a mixed message to america's enemies and denigrating the contribution of dozens of dedicated american public servants. although Mitt stopped a tad short of calling for impeachment.

 

Only a lefty would look to Google for a view on free speech.

Those pinheads bow to whatever governments tell them to do.

 

when you're not charged for a service, you're not the customer, you're the product. Youtube makes it's money from advertising.

 

good for you. i couldn't hack 3 minutes of the trailer it was so bad.

 

they just follow local laws. i'm sure Applebees would love to sell margaritas to 14 y/os, but it's not corporate integrity stopping them, it's local laws.

 

It's about risk and returns. They unfortunately have to weight the risk of defying local authorities with the knowledge that if they do all their content will be banned. It's easier to follow local rules and still be able to advertise to that market.

 

Elmo should have made a movie instead of getting drunk and disturbing the peace of passersby.

 

One of my adult sons and I watched it together. It was terrible. But I watched the whole thing.

 

That's correct in the sense that modern historians don't believe Mohammed ever existed.

 

Huh?

Mohammeds existence is well documented from more than just muslim sources.
Of course there is a school of thought that claims Jesus never existed.

 

if you don't like a movie then don't watch it , can you imagine people protesting and shooting ambassadors because they don't like scat porn ?