Liberals are more Feminine; Conservatives are more Masculine

Are men in liberal countries like Italy, Canada or Australia more feminine?

 

Not sure I follow your logic. Giving a tax break isnt a capeability. And its a belief in the individuals capeabilities that leads to government encouraging the formation of stable households so people can govern their own lives.

 

I actually partially agree with education, Democrats get more votes from people based on solicitation, the teachers unions are a Democrat lobby, however this form of education is not the kind of education that makes people more intellegent actually its similar to the type of propaganda people used to rationalize the Eugenics programs that were taking place across the globe during WW2.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444358804578016291138331904.html

The above article agree's that conservatives tend to be more masculin than liberals, while libertarians are the most masculin and also superior at problem solving.

 

Nice try, but you stated your position plainly in the other thread: You believe government should encourage behavior that you find favorable for the "benefit of society." Why, if you "believe in individuals" as you claim, do you need the government nanny to encourage citizens to "form stable households?"

 

I dread to think of the gender fluidity of the old soviet bloc.

 

???? So more of them do so, of course. Still, not sure I follow your logic

 

This thread is just one more example of why the Republicans lost the last election and will continue to lose elections- the thought process behind this thread represents why the Republicans will continue to lose women voters.

 

This is about something more important than the process of winning elections. But, maybe you have something.

If a guy is a liberal and has an emotional hard-wiring, he couldn't help but jump to the wrong conclusion when looking at this topic.

For what it's worth, I don't believe women are inferior as much as I believe they process the world around them emotionally first and primarily before they use whatever rational thought they are possessed of.

But, in the final analysis, if a person like you thinks it would alienate women, you probably should be listened to.

Even though alienating should be the last thing they'd feel.

Oh well.

 

Republicans still get the majority of married women, it is the single women who flock to the democrats.Especially the single mothers. They know "It Takes a Village" to raise a child while Republican mothers believe it takes a mother and a father.

 

Hint: I am attacking your position that you "believe in the capabilities of individuals."

 

Canada? Absolutely. They're more metro than American libs. They're as bad as the Brits and the French. Australians and Italians really shouldn't be liberal at all. Australian men, in my experience, seem to live a lot like Texans. Just with less manners.

Actually, what it shows is why the left is not as pro-science as it likes to believe. Nothing in the OP is offensive. The fact that it is being construed as such by some leftists here appears to betray a belief that femininity is somehow less desirable than masculinity.

 

And when the single women get married they are more likely to become less strident like Beyonce did after she married "Mr. Carter."

www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/03/22/low_info_outreach_beyonce_and_me

 

So should we keep allowing the male approach to problem solving continue into the future? If the past gives a glimpse of what our future is going to be like if we continue using present logic... then we are all truly fuoked.

 

Tony Abbott,, Australia's number one Liberal. Looks quite masculine to me

 

That's strange because Texans are especially effeminate. Are you sure you really want to say that about Australia?

 

hmmm. Interesting perspective and I would say there is actually some validity to it.
Conservatives are fine with letting people starve in the streets if it means they get to keep their tanks (which even the generals say we don't need) etc... That's definitely a male trait.
Liberals care about our citizens and want to make sure they can get things like food and health care and stuff - even if it means giving up some tanks. So that's more feminine.

But then I would say another way of looking at it is possible: Intellectual / Independent vs. Emotional / Follower
LibDems are obviously the more Intellectual / Analytical.

Virtually every scientific institute in the world has acknowledged the effects of pollution on our atmostphere. LibDems are okay with that science thing. ConservaRepubs claim the world is flat and that the entire world-wide scientific community is conspiring against them. Emotional vs Intellect.
LibDems realize that if two gay people get married.... nothing happens to their personal lives. ConservaRepubs freak out and make the most emotional and hysterical claims, it's actually funny. OMG if that's legal, everyone will go gay! Regardless of the law, someone of the same sex is not going to arouse a hetero LibDem. Intellect vs. Emotion.
If FOX says it, 90%+ of ConservaRepubs absolutely agree with it! Followers. LibDems? They have criticized Obama for drone strikes, continuing the Patriot Act, passing NDAA and so on. Independents.
Even then, if something is factual and even verified by their thought masters at FOX, then facts become "liberal" and so is that darn Liberal Media! Time to get out the ConservaRepub Victim Card.
For example, it's not the Michelle Bachmann has said some truly stupid crap, it's that the Liberal Media is attacking her. (Victim Card). Emotion.

Additionally, when a ConservaRepub doesn't like a post, they will not directly address the subject. Instead, they attack the poster, change the subject or dodge. They may occasionally parrot a quick FOX soundbite and then play the victim card and Cut & Run. Emotion. Liberals will directly address the subject, provide links, facts and all kinds of stuff that annoys ConservaRepubs. Intellect.

I guess there are lots of dichotomies that would apply.

 

Interesting that you call yourself NoPartyAffiliation and yet you've been programmed with the same PC misandrist anti-male garbage that permeates the left. Like most modern western males, you appear to be ashamed of your dick. Unless you are female. In which case I apologize for making an assumption. I probably should have asked that first. Regardless, it doesn't change your misandrist attitude. No matter what your gender.

And this is where you have it backwards. Libs are terrible with logic, reason, and fact. They typically feel their way to a pre-determined conclusion on most issues and then work backward to piece together a rationalization for it. For instance, if conservatives don't vote for Obama, it must clearly be because they are racist. Nevermind the fact that they loved Herman Cain who was blacker than Obama in every sense. This won't even enter their reality. Because they need to emotionally feel that conservatives are racist regardless of what their actions actually show.

Liberals deal very much in the "ought" and very little in the "is."

Ignorance here as well. The difference between conservatives and liberals is that liberals have no problem injecting activism into science to push an agenda. Conservatives prefer pure and untainted empirical science that actually follows the scientific method.

Okay, I'm not sure if you're deliberately trolling at this point or you really just don't understand conservative positions at all. Because you might as well just be talking about flying unicorns here, you are so absurdly off the mark. This is so ridiculous it almost doesn't even deserve a response.

Michelle Bachmann is nuts. I won't argue with that. But you sound like you're not aware that the mainstream media leans left. This isn't really debatable. People who have worked in that industry have written books about the goings on within it. What would be emotional would be ignoring obvious slants because you agree with the positions being expressed. Which is what most people do who do not find fault with the MSM. It's difficult to call this intellectual. This is pure emotional partisanship.

You must be posting on a different forum. Nothing you have said here describes this one. If anything, it is 180 degrees from what actually happens here. Personally, I get thoroughly tired of liberals not being able to stay on topic, resorting to ad hominem, or - like you have done quite well in this post - using straw man after straw man and making no honest effort to actually understand the opposing viewpoint before attacking it.

 

Lol! You don't even believe that.

 

"Sah mazculine!"

Conservatives have somewhat of a masculinity complex. They feel insecure and thus go overboard trying to act mucho.

 

We seem to be seeing the same thing here with libs. Nothing like whining like a little girl "I am not wimpy!" Then stomping their little foot and running away.

 

When you look at the most pressing problems facing this country you'll find that those policies and programs and ideas conceived and implemented by Liberals (whose males are hard-wired with feminine tendencies to act on their emotions rather than reason,) are the offending culprits.

Just ONE example (and one which is very seldom mentioned but needs to be known) is the decision to introduce abortion to Muslim countries. Planned Parenthood goes into these third world countries under the banner of the United States of America and protected by the full weight of US protections. And this is something the traditional Conservative Muslims consider an abomination. But they don't blame US Liberals and Democrats, they blame America.

Imposing Progressive viewpoints onto deeply religious Muslim populations is one of the ways we instigate and agitate Muslims to rise up in protest against AMERICA.

That's not a Male approach. It is a females approach or a male with a female's viewpoint and hard wiring.

 

"Interesting that you call yourself NoPartyAffiliation and yet you've been programmed with the same PC misandrist anti-male garbage that permeates the left. Like most modern western males, you appear to be ashamed of your dick. Unless you are female. In which case I apologize for making an assumption. I probably should have asked that first. Regardless, it doesn't change your misandrist attitude. No matter what your gender."

Ah I see.Facts upset you. You're emotional. Hysterical, actually. Thank you for proving my point. And let's see. Hmmm. You're obsessed with my dick. Interesting. So are you latent or out of the closet there sweetheart?

"And this is where you have it backwards. Libs are terrible with logic, reason, and fact. They typically feel their way to a pre-determined conclusion on most issues and then work backward to piece together a rationalization for it. For instance, if conservatives don't vote for Obama, it must clearly be because they are racist. Nevermind the fact that they loved Herman Cain who was blacker than Obama in every sense. This won't even enter their reality. Because they need to emotionally feel that conservatives are racist regardless of what their actions actually show. Liberals deal very much in the "ought" and very little in the "is."

Ah yes of course. You continue proving my points for me. Did I call you a racist? No. I know a LOT of people who didn't vote for Obama and I don't think any of them are racist. But here's the difference between us Peewee. The OP obviously doesn't bother me and I even acknowledged there is some validity to it. Of course, that's just the intellectual / analytical side. But when someone posts something that isn't complimentary to your political views, what do you do? Get Emotional. Hysterical actually. Do you hear that? That would be me laughing at you proving my point.

"Ignorance here as well. The difference between conservatives and liberals is that liberals have no problem injecting activism into science to push an agenda. Conservatives prefer pure and untainted empirical science that actually follows the scientific method."

Again thanks for proving my point! So if you disagree with the scientific conclusions of virtually every scientific institute in the world, it must be that Liberals have traveled the entire world and "tainted" the science! LOL! Emotional vs. Intellect. Cute though <pat on head>

"Michelle Bachmann is nuts. I won't argue with that. But you sound like you're not aware that the mainstream media leans left. This isn't really debatable. People who have worked in that industry have written books about the goings on within it. What would be emotional would be ignoring obvious slants because you agree with the positions being expressed. Which is what most people do who do not find fault with the MSM. It's difficult to call this intellectual. This is pure emotional partisanship."

Hmmm. the Media leans Left. I would say that's probably true. Most people in the media are educated, well-traveled and at fairly sophisticated. Yes, I would have to acknowledge this is probably true. But does this mean they won't report a story that hurts the Democrats? Of course not. So you get emotional because they don't report things they you like. Poor baby. Those of us who are more intellectual and analytical don't whine like little girls. We just find additional sources (and no, I don't mean whackjob sites like NewsMax, Americanthinker or DailyKos, btw). If you're that upset, I would suggest reading foreign media.

"You must be posting on a different forum. Nothing you have said here describes this one. If anything, it is 180 degrees from what actually happens here. Personally, I get thoroughly tired of liberals not being able to stay on topic, resorting to ad hominem, or - like you have done quite well in this post - using straw man after straw man and making no honest effort to actually understand the opposing viewpoint before attacking it."

Wrong. I'm referring to this one. I disagree with LibDems here often. They will bring up facts, provide links and so forth. ConservaRepubs? Well the first thing they do is write some emotional gibberish about the poster instead of the topic. Something like say...
" you appear to be ashamed of your dick!"
Then they will claim I am really a Liberal (again off topic), then change the subject and so on. Kinda like, well, you know. You.

So this has been quite entertaining. Please feel free to continue.

 

If you call being taught whitey is the devil, and being conditioned to DEPEND on the god-state for every single thing in your life "educated", then sure.

I call it "indoctrinated". But you can call it "educated".

 

Aw, what the heck would someone from Las Vegas know about anything?!? Nice weather we're having, aren't we?

 

I know you are, but what am I? I know you are, but what am I? I know you are, but what am I? I know you are, but what am I? I know you are, but what am I?