Should their be a limit to the number of abortions a healthy female can have?

No option for what I would vote for. As many as she likes, and they should be taxpayer funded.

 

WHY is the number important to you?

Sounds like you're saying , "" OK, I can't CONTROL women by stopping abortions so I'll try to CONTROL the number they have. I will ignore the fact that sterilizing men would help stop unwanted pregnancy because men should never be controlled."""

 

From your poll:

"""Yes. One max(with extreme exception)
Yes two.(with good reason for second)"""

WHO determines what an "extreme exception" is ?

WHO determines what a "good" reason is ?

 

Freedom means freedom. Taxpayer funding of abortions makes it un-free for the people paying for them.

 

Taxpayers do not pay for abortions. And even if they did it would be cheaper than adding more children to the Welfare rolls or having them raised by the government.


Freedom means freedom ...and it isn't free....and it applies to women, too!!! They pay taxes!! They are free to get abortions and should have access to safe , affordable, abortion.

 

But the poster I responded to WANTS them paid for with taxes and that is what I responded to so take it up with her.

And you are certain that more children will be added to the welfare rolls? If abortion remains legal, how would this necessarily be a problem (to say nothing of the fact that we can simply limit welfare payments)

 

Yes, I'm certain because if poor (and more middle class)women can't get abortions they will be forced to have more children. Especially if they have trouble getting reliable, affordable Birth Control (which Anti-Choicers want to make more difficult).

Oh, so you can "simply" limit welfare payments ? .....what do you intend to limit these CHILDREN to...just clothes, just food, less food, less heat, less electricity, ...???

 

I would not be "ok" with it, but it's not my choice to make... it's hers

 

I haven't voted as none of the options come anywhere near what my opinion is .. I suspect because the OP has an underlying agenda that they hope the poll will provide support for.

 

But should it be?

I mean, don't get me wrong, some of the votes on here(or what people have voted for), are way too much, but at the same time, there is no reason why a health female, with a healthy fetus, should be having multiple abortions.

There is no excuse for an unwanted pregnancy, in most cases.

Even the MAP can be bought over the counter, and works for 72hours or more, after sex.

- - - Updated - - -

Nope...

 

Would you mind answering my questions in post #78?

As to ""There is no excuse for an unwanted pregnancy, in most cases.""


Spoken like someone who will never have to worry about being pregnant and someone who wouldn't stand in front of millions of women who have unwanted pregnancies and tell THEM that.

 

No.

Tell me why you think it is not true, rather than just throw in a line like that, as if doing so totally defeats my point.

- - - Updated - - -

Doctors and the medical bodies.

Those best qualified.

Unless you can think of anyone better?

 

Funny...you didn't even mention the woman who is the one who is pregnant...no decisions for her, right?
Women are ALL just too stupid to make decisions on their own?

 

No one has said that though, have they?

No.

But if someone will not use contraception, and sleeps around, then I don't have much pity when they funnily enough, keep getting pregnant.

 

You have continually implied women are so stupid they need somone else to decide their breeding habits. YOU started this thread!!!

And NO ONE is asking for your pity, they don't need it....

 

I disagree, and think you are choosing to read it that way.

Not my fault if you choose to read it that way.