100k attendee estimate for Gay Pride Parade in DC

did you miss the pat on the fanny? How about the sign which reads "drill ass, not gas" . I hope you have fun explaining that to a 9 year old

- - - Updated - - -

and what about the sign being carried in the picture with the phrase "drill ass, not gas"

does that also have to do with pushups?

 

So essentially, you think harboring a negative opinion on sodomy ought to be made a thought-crime. I've got that about right, haven't I?

 

"Anal sex receptive"?

You mean like this?

 

Totally different context without any qualifiers to allow the observer to know what is actually going on. In the gay pride photo however there are many other qualifiers. I'd hardly call the woman standing on the edge of the sand volleyball court ball in hand, crouching to prepare for a serve [as Bush is doing???] is the same as a man clearly spread as far eagle as physically possible, extending his rump as high in the air as he can manage in that position, with a somatic "do me" look on his face, in a gay parade with "drill ass not gas" signs directly behind him.

Context is everything. Nice try though.

 

Clearly that is precisely what I stated, and I quote "I see it as a '(*)(*)(*)(*) you' to all the hate-filled loonies who think they have a right to an opinion about what human beings of homosexual orientation do behind closed doors." Since context skills of some of the readers of that quote *apparently* may be lacking, I will break this down into bite size words for you: Every action has a consequence of equal measure. If you oppress the rights of those of homosexual orientation, expect consequences.

 

Sounds like a threat, "Sunkissed"... I see the word "banned" isn't under your name yet.

Meanwhile, the issue isn't with what homosexuals do behind closed doors. It's what they're doing in public and what they're trying to hold out as an icon for young to aspire to as "normal" via the conduit of marriage... http://www.politicalforum.com/curre...boys-ages-13-29-getting-hiv-last-7-years.html

Is this behind closed doors? No, it's on Mainstreet in the Heartland, in full view of families with children...

 

No, but it's obviously a corrrect inference. To put a little finer point on it, there is no doubt in my mind that you'd make a swell storm trooper.

Clearly that's the last thing you're concerned about, though I don't doubt it makes you feel righteous as all get-out to pretend otherwise.

 

The issue is about legislating whether or not two human beings have the right to love each other.

People do not choose who they fall in love with. IF marriage is about love, this is not an issue which the state (or anyone else for that matter) should have an opinion.

Love is a civil right.

(Also, if reading comprehension was a requirement in order to post on this forum, of the two of us I wouldn't be the one getting banned.)

- - - Updated - - -

Let me know when you have an actual argument to make rather than attempting to make this personal (which implies you *have no argument*, an accurate presumption if I say so myself.)

 

Really, brah? Really?? You're comparing an Olympic athlete being coached to a vulgar display on a public street?

Really??!?

 

Even if it is a vulgar display on the street, why does it get you hot and bothered?

 

I hope you stay around sunkissed. You're perfect for this. Your disconnect and adamant defense of your disconnected position is exactly why society needs to debate this topic until we understand what's really going on here.

A vulgar display in public in the presence of children and you defend it by attempting to distract with a strawman... yes folks, these are the people who want gay marriage to be the new social icon.. The same folks who celebrate a child predator as their "civil rights" icon. [see my signature]

 

Because people also have the right not to have themselves and their children subjected to it.

 

I suppose you're of the opinion children should be coddled and protected from reality, no matter how harsh that reality may be to your oh-so-fragile worlds?

Newsflash: At some point children also will learn Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny aren't real too.

 

From over displays of this sort of thing?

You better believe it buddy.

As any parent would, but then homosexuals would not understand this, since they cannot have children, due to the fact that nature must be 'homopohobic'.

 

When these sheltered children enter *the real world* where they will work amongst a protected class of individuals who are homosexual (and by homosexual, I don't mean dancing in the street, I mean having homo sexual relationships within their homes, with it going up the rear and everything) and who must co-exist in a society with these individuals who, in the very near future, will be allowed to legally marry each other, in every state, will you still be laughing when they can't manage to cope with / function in this society?

 

If I make lewd, vulgar gestures in public and around children, I will be arrested. But if a member of the powerful, perverse gay lobby does the same, everyone turns a blind eye.

I actually enjoy pictures like the one put above. It pretty much proves everything I've say about homosexual men and their deviant lifestyles.

 

You are allowed to marry an individual you love. You will not experience discrimination and hostility your entire life because of your choice (if you can say love is a choice).

You do not have the need to make lewd, vulgar gestures in public in order to make the point that you exist, that your sexual orientation exists, and that neither are going away.

 

And why?

Because the authorities are too afraid of being called a 'homophobe', that is why.

- - - Updated - - -

And neither do homosexuals.

It does nothing for their public image, which becomes a parody of itself.

 

Argument is unnecessary when the point has been made.

 

Homosexuals will ironically create new antipathy that was not there previous, owing to vulgar displays like this, and the haughty attitude that goes with.

It is a given.

No matter what I say, or anyone says, that will be the (sadly) inevitable outcome.

How ironic.

 

You know, maybe there wouldn't be so much (as you say) discrimination and hostility directly towards homosexuals if they weren't so proud to make lewd, vulgar gestures in public. Maybe if they really were just like the rest of us, except behind closed doors, then there would be no problem.

The problem is they're not just like the rest of us. They are perfectly comfortable being disgusting and perverse out in the wide open light of day, in public, and with plenty of children around.

Post Script: I don't remember seeing anything of such disgusting activities during the civil rights marches of the 60's. So you look pretty silly talking about how such actions are needed to fight discrimination.

 

Your signature is a proven lie so I'm not sure how you think pointing to a proven lie helps you?

 

Pervert Pandering Day.

Gay BLT day.

Pedophiles on Parade.

What ever you want to call it I see no reason to be prideful of nor boastful of the unnatural desire to put one's penis in the rectum of another man.

See your mental healthcare provider.

 

yup, that's definitely the take away I got with men grabbing each others unit and tongue kissing and signs stating "drill ass, not gas"

 

And speaking of them seeing mental health providers....did you know that one of the first signs law enforcement looks for in children as an indication that they have been/are being molested, is if they are acting out sexually in public? First sign. And so it's not a coincidence I'm sure that the head of HIV studies at the CDC noted that there is an epidemic of gay men having been sexually assaulted as children. And the Mayo Clinic noting that the main predicter of a person becoming a child molester is if s/he was molested his or herself as a child.

So their acting out sexually in public in front of children is clearly a predictable behavior. I think more than political correctness, people see that it's a living cry for help. A cry for help on parade down main street. Only the cry for help should not be met with "support" for that behavior by promoting it through marriage!. It should be met with intervention.

I underlined "activities" above in the quote to illustrate the difference between behavior and race.