Abortion is "the same as killing a child"???

Yeah.

Still not going to speculate. Sorry.

 

my god this is tedious…ok hopefully you answer my three questions in kind…

they are not the same because the first answer reads like this

and my second answer reads like this

so i dunno about you but they are two different answers..to two different questions…

now answer my three questions.
or i will hound you in every post that you do not answer questions but only ask them and demand people do so...

 

Why?

If I was in front of a woman who was about to shoot a 5 year old....I'd coldcock her or break her fingers to get the gun to stop her.

Why are you ALL OF A SUDDEN getting so "quiet" about how far you would go....to do what you have ALREADY ADMITTED YOU WOULD DO....to stop a woman from swallowing RU-486???

Again, I'm not talking about permanently damaging or killing her...after all, her body "belongs to the baby" right. But knocking her out wouldn't risk the pregnancy much....breaking her "pill hand" fingers wouldn't risk it AT ALL.....

Don't you want to save that "child" in her womb?!?!?!?

- - - Updated - - -

No, you don't get to DODGE my questions and then demand I answer yours because you CLAIM to have answered mine.

Is "the difference" because you used to sell RU-486??? What does that mean? You used to be an "accomplice to murder"...and therefore you wouldn't feel obligated to try to stop a woman from "committing murder" by taking RU-486?

 

Depending on the situation, I can't know what I would or wouldn't do (and neither does anyone else) - so I have no want or need to speculate about it. Would I do something - anything - to try to stop her?

Yes.

What exactly WOULD I do?

Who knows

 

Yet another sound bite with no meaning or relevance . .keep going its funny to behold.

- - - Updated - - -

Nice evasion.

 

Yet another sound bite with no meaning or relevance . .keep going its funny to behold.

 

The realm of the those who avoid by copying others is hilarious.

 

At least we are both laughing now.

I thought I was gonna be the only one.

 

Trying to prove your point with make-believe friends (""""I can't know what I would or wouldn't do (and neither does anyone else)""" ) doesn't work...unless you have some "beam of light" or something that can read their minds.....

 

you think a lot of things that are fallacies.

 

So, do you know what others would do in that situation?

Even if they don't?

- - - Updated - - -

Still laughing.

I might have peed a little too.

 

Yeh bladder control can be a problem for people who are unsure and nervous about the fallacies they try to hood wink people with .. try one of these it might help - http://www.health.com/health/gallery/0,,20457139,00.html

 

Try as I may to discourage your efforts to attack me personally - you don't seem able to get a clue.

So, let me just lay it out for you.

You next attempts to come at me personally will be reported.

Is that clear enough?

 

No, I don't know but because I don't know doesn't mean I can read everyone else's mind and see that they don't know and niether can anyone else including you....

 

How is that any different from what I said?

Oh wait....

It's not.

 

Ditto .. the next time you accuse me of being pro-abortion, or in denial I will report you .. is that clear enough?

 

Not to nitpick but...you said """"I can't know what I would or wouldn't do (and neither does anyone else).

Indicating you thought no one else would know what to do ...but you can't know if they would know what to do ...

This is fun...ring around the rosey...

 

Dude, attention to detail. There's no excuse when it's one short sentence.

 

I never said anything about anyone not knowing 'what to do' and you should know that.

I only said that I (nor anyone else) can KNOW in advance what they actually WOULD do.

The closest anyone can get - is to announce what they think their intentions would be.

This is my last on it because I can tell you are not interested in the truth about anything I say and because of that you're only wasting time for both of us.

/ignore.

 

Color me devastated....

Sorry , I got you confused...didn't mean to...

 

You are justifying murdering by using God whom you don't believe in. I suppose with your argument---we could murder anyone eh?

- - - Updated - - -

Pro-murder is not pro-Christian. I do imagine they are pro-liberal...with an ideology that takes the place of the Word of God.

 

Is that a variation of ,"But they're not REALLY christians", (said by christians when one of their own is seen as being naughty...)

 

Actually, most of these members are considered "mainline" churches, and I am sure they are very well aware of the "Word of God." I am quite sure that none of them would call the pro-choice position a "pro-murder" stand.

Member Organizations

American Jewish Committee
American Jewish Congress
Anti-Defamation League
Catholics for Choice
Central Conference of American Rabbis
Disciples for Choice
Episcopal Church
Episcopal Women’s Caucus
General Board of Church and Society of the United Methodist Church
Jewish Reconstructionist Movement
Jewish Women International
Lutheran Women’s Caucus
Metropolitan Community Church
NA’AMAT USA
National Council of Jewish Women
Presbyterian Mission Agency
Presbyterians Affirming Reproductive Options (PARO)
Rabbinical Assembly
Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association
Society for Humanistic Judaism
Union for Reform Judaism
Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations
Unitarian Universalist Women’s Federation
United Church of Christ
United Methodist Women
Women of Reform Judaism
Women’s League for Conservative Judaism

 

Its a matter of not following the Bible or its teachings.. Islam has the Koran. Christianity has the Bible. Its commonsense that when you veer from the original foundation and create a new foundation---you don't have the same religion. I was a liberal Christian once...meaning I went to church and believed in God---but not necessarily believed in the Bible. I believed in God---but it was my own human desires that dictated my values and my own perception of what was "right" and "wrong".

 

They are all liberal ideology...meaning they veer away or even don't believe in the validity of the Bible. Bible believers believe that we shouldn't murder. I will grant you...that their are people in my church who believe in abortion. These people also don't believe in the validity of the Bible. So even some people in MY Church...are not conservative christian.

A church is not cookie cutter---but when you say "conservative Christian"--you are talking about people who believe in the validity of the Bible. And they don't adhere to murder.