"We are all Muslim", or "We are Charlie"....which do you choose?

Question: if you had to choose one or the other, which would you choose: M. Moore's "We are all Muslim", or more of what Richard Dawkins believes, "We are Charlie". Muslim or Charlie, which do you choose?

Me, I love Muslims and I love freedom of expression, but if I had to pick only one I'd pick freedom of expression (that "pesky" 1st Amendment and all), so....I am Charlie.

What about you?

 

You aren't that in favor of freedom of expression in so much as you are attempting to limit people to your false choice, now are you?.

 

Hehe, yes, exactly, people are free to choose from the many many choices that I give them.

- - - Updated - - -

I see your point, but if you had to choose one, which would it be?....which one would it be more (Moore) of?

 

We are all Charlie. No one is safe from Muslim Radicals. Not even Muslims. BuhBye MM.

 

Neither. I am an anarchist like that.

 

I bet 1.5 billion of us are NOT Charlie. That is what is leading us to WWIII. I'm not sure if any of the 1.5 billion will say "yes, Mohammad got it wrong when he said not to depict him." So I am Charlie.

- - - Updated - - -

You won't stand for freedom then.....in WWIII the sides are being drawn....choose your side wisely.

 

The Muslim crocodile will eat him last (and NOT just because he's a huge huge mouthful, either)!

 

`
Neither.

 

You don't support freedom, like "Charlie"? Incredible.

 

Both are radical groups, (*)(*)(*)(*) them both.

 

Yada Yada Yada. If we must engage in fantasy role-playing, then I side with Hermione Granger. Emma Watson is quite fit these days.

 

The leftists like Moore, and the Muslims, yes, radical....but Dawkins and "I am Charlie" pro-freedom groups are certainly not radical - unless science and reason and freedom are considered "radical".

 

Shooting up the Charlie office isn't "expression"

 

Then you should take that use of language up with the OP

 

The DNC has made it's choice clear, they boo God and cheer Allah: Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Let's bring Muslims to State of the Union

Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chair of the DNCommittee is calling on colleagues to take a Muslim to the State of the Union aligning the Democrats with with Muslims and patronizing the followers of Mohammed.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/democrats-muslim-sotu-216793?cmpid=sf

 

The woman is an inbred syphilitic troglodyte and not even the DNC cares about the insanity she continually vomits.

I am not part of the "We are all Muslim" --- as far as I'm concerned, we are NOT all Muslim. I am squarely in the we are all Charlie camp.

 

"Control the options." Isn't that out of 58 laws of power? People fall for this?

 

Were you Charlie when they mocked victims of 9/11 and the holocaust?

 

Charlie Brown

 

Sure - freedom of speech and expression baby. It doesn't mean we all have to like what's said... just that it's allowed to BE said.

 

This is a false dilemma. I nether support Muslims nor do I support being vulgar and sacrilegious.

I choose to stay out of it.

Of course people have the right to say whatever they want but there are consequences. It doesn't matter what the laws say, this is real life not some lawmaker's dream world.

I think I'm not pro-Muslim either because I think if they become a problem those people who are the problem should be stomped, hard!

 

On a more serious note, over 100,000 improperly vetted Syrians have been quietly settled into the US.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/1...syrian-immigration-quietly-tops-100000-since/

 

If you have to choose which one you choose MORE, which would it be? I'm going to assume "We are all Muslims", by your response. So you'd be putting your hat in with people who approve of FGM (like Mohammad did), approve of the Qur'an's call to torture, behead, beat women (Q4:34), have sex slaves from non-believing captives, etc. Or do you?

 

Battle lines are being drawn in this war (the start of WWIII). It's obvious who the Dems side with.

- - - Updated - - -

WHAT!? You mean you don't belong to the camp that wants to implement Sharia Law (crucifixions, torture, stonings, sex slavery....all are in the Qur'an.) What are you, moral or something!?

 

I wasn't disputing his use of the term and was instead disputing yours.