What is white privilege?

That's because the usual bunch of whites and jews apparently can't seem to end their backward age long culture of treating black people badly. The OP is proof of that.

 

Have to look at effected Jews vs total Jews. Total numbers don't tell the whole story. Per capita is a more telling indicator. Not saying Jews were effected the worst either. But considering our numbers, we've been hit hard many times. Nothing to scoff at.

 

I do not accept that a life of a Jew is worth more than an other.
So total numbers it is.

Probably way less than others. I mean, the Huns aint around. And with them many others are gone.
Cartage was a huge empire. Nothing left of it's people and it's culture, except some bricks and broken pottery.

 

That is a lie. Look at the government jobs workforce distribution before making such claims.

 

Yea, and I it is kind of hard to detect where exactly it become unequal.
I understand that you want to have several justice systems running in parallel, i.e. separate justice for every race.
But don't you think it would mean race segregation?

 

Its not a lie. Look at the OP.

 

When black people systematically get longer sentences than white people for the same offense.
And when black people don't get free on probation as easy as white.

Than it's easy to detect where exactly the problem is.

It would mean to punish racists far more severe. Affirmative action isn't good enough. It has to go with an active policy of hunting down racists and throw them in jail.

 

People catagorize each other and judge entire groups according to representatives they meet or hear about. A disfunctional part of black culture has a reputation for killing and law breaking. Their notoriety bleeds onto normal functioning blacks. It isn't fair, but it is a fact. In the absence of other causes which include overt racism, another "causation for why black people's names are discriminated' is on one level because of the actions of others who are generalized to the group. .

 

Than it doesn't exist.

Correlation. Correlation can be fact. What makes you think it can't? I just don't see a causation

LOL white names. Names don't have color.

 

There was nothing in your post that indicated that the subjects of your referenced study were intelligence tested, and I saw nothing in the study you cited which indicated IQ testing for the subjects. I stand by my observation. If you think that employers are not able to observe intelligence and motivational differences in the people they interview, you are ignorant. There are many subtle cues that intelligent, motivated people can pick up on.

Your post is more typical of a hate filled SJW. Your tendency to resort to hate speech to describe anyone that disagrees with your viewpoint is noted.

There is a generally acceptance of a tested IQ level of 85 for ( median or mean, I forget which) for the black population as a whole in the US, which is only 15 points above the 70 level below which one is entitled to SSI. If I recall correctly that is about 10 points below how whites as a whole on average test out, and Asians are even higher than whites. One of my black friends was exploring the possibility that blacks test higher as a whole in emotional intelligence than whites, and that could end up being true, but as long as any inquiry into relative strengths and weaknesses continues to be discouraged by the PC crowd we will never know. It's perfectly OK that blacks have crowded whites out of many sports areas, though; no one is supposed to complain about that.

IMO male blacks that in Africa in many cultures lolled under trees socializing while the women slaved in the hot fields are just being true to form in this culture. Female blacks seem to do just as well as white females when they are able to escape premature reproduction at the hands of their males and get a decent job. Maybe the males should take care of the kids and free their women to earn a living, instead of leading the often parasitic lifestyle so many underclass blacks seem to. That's (childcare, while their wives work) what many white males have been doing of late.

Yes, males are harsher with children than females, but that's what the bottom 70% of blacks in the US seem to need to be taught--limits, and how to follow rules, so they don't feel entitled to break them and end up in prison.

My opinions happen to have value because of many unique opportunities I have had in life to observe many walks of life. Additionally, I am capable of thinking rather than emoting, and I have a right to my thoughts without being flogged by you because what I say doesn't "feel" good to you. Labeling someone a racist and denizen of Stormfront just because they see a flaw in a pet study of yours is a lazy, cheap shot.

The sinister plans of some to dumb down our society using one backward portion of one of our cultural groups as a spearhead is noted. To what end is this objective? To make us more malleable by the ultra rich, or to prepare us for takeover by Marxists?

 

And these Whites and Jews have names or are they just figments of the liberal imagination?

 

Sorry, randy, but you got it just ass-backwards -- affirmative action (better known as REVERSE DISCRIMINATION) is an un-American, un-democratic, anti-contitutional system that favors Blacks, NOT Whites....

 

So your solution is to give more special rights for African Americans and provide mandatory long sentences to whites regardless of the criminal case.
What about women, should they also be equally imprisoned?
And of course we need to create a legal definition of racism.
The action of racism is when a person of European descent does not do a favor to a person of African descent.

 

"Racism" is something that only straight, white, republican males are capable of... at least that's what I gather from reading news story by the national news outlets.

 

Check this out.

http://www.unz.com/article/the-iq-gap-is-no-longer-a-black-and-white-issue/

 

Yea your right, that's what it is. Even though we can clearly see the injustices being done its just the leftwing excuse machines.

- - - Updated - - -

No we just want ONE Justice System that is EQUAL to everyone no matter what their color.

- - - Updated - - -

So how is it that WHITE women benefit more from AA than anyone. Which in turn means white men benefit from it as well.

 

"Privilege" is the end result of failed egalitarian thinking. People are convinced that the races are actually the same regardless of being physically different (and therefore I feel there is no reason to believe they are necessarily the same in all other regards should they differ in one). But if they look around with their own eyes it still looks like Europeans and a smattering of Asians are still running the show even in spite of the entire system being geared against them, e.g. progressive taxation, AA/quotas.

That creates a situation that appears nonsensical to them - how can all people be fundamentally equal should some consistently have more than others? In order to fill the resulting vacuum they've channelled all this thought into a new construct they so willingly wish to believe, the simple idea that an almost magic-like "privilege" floats around the head of every European which (apparently) affects everyone else in a negative way - though being the holder of this "privilege", the European himself is unaware of it. It is very similar to the witch-hunts of the Inquisition, the constant accusation that somebody else is dabbling in "dark magic"/witchery, yet most of the time, those accused were simply ordinary people.

The egalitarian myth obviously needs this lie in order to survive. Without it the whole belief falls through as there is no real way to explain how some groups do so well compared to others without simply acknowledging the superiority/inferiority of groups. Optimally the egalitarian does not even want to admit that any groups exist (the technical definition of "racism" is believing that any differences even exist between them to begin with) but obviously can't pull that off until everybody is equally productive... an unachievable pipe dream.

 

All of the participants were trained to respond to the interview equally and to accomplish this all of the participants needed to be of the same general intelligence. You can't train a "stupid person" to respond intelligently to questioning.

Once agian this reflects ignorance on intelligence testing.

http://www.apa.org/topics/intelligence/

IQ tests don't test human intelligence. IQ tests measure a very limited subset of human intelligence and compares it to others. What's worse is that "statistics" can never be applied to the person. To apply statistics reflects a "predetermination" which is prejudice. So the person that assumes a black person apply for a job is less intelligent because of statistics related to black IQ test scores is exhibiting anti-black racial prejudice. You can only judge the person and all statistics must be ignored to eliminate prejudice.

That's what has been assumed in previous posts. It's being assumed that the black participants in the 2003 EPI study were less intelligent because of statistics on black IQ tests (that don't measure human intelligence). That reflects anti-black racial prejudice based upon statistics being applied to individuals that those conducting the test would have certainly ensured against in selecting the participants.

Finally people aren't actually very good at determining the intelligence of another person based upon conversations with them. Often, for example, a person where English is their second language, will be considered less intelligence because of their language skills while language skills don't reflect human intelligence at all. During my career I was often involved in hiring decisions and I never had any clue about what the IQ was of those applying for a job nor do I believe any of the other hiring managers had any clue. Anecdotally, in aerospace manufacturing engineering, I once had an employee that based upon his writing skills appeared to not be too intelligent but over time I learned that this man was able to envision in 3-D what a 2-D engineering drawing represented better than anyone else I've ever known. He problably didn't score very high on an IQ test because of his math and English skills but when it came to "Spatial Intelligence" he exceeded anyone else I've ever known. A fantastic mind in an area that perhaps only MENSA tests well. I would rank him as a genius today but it took me months to realize this very special ability that wouldn't have shown up significantly on a standard IQ test. Without months of working with this person no one would have realized how intelligent he really was. It certainly wouldn't have been identified in a job interview.

 

Although you didn't provide any links to credible sources to back up your assertion, even if we simply take your word for the idea that WHITE women benefit more from reverse-discrimination (AA) than anyone else, could it just possibly be because Blacks make up just 13.2% of the population of the U. S.? Link: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

Here's a "news flash", brutha -- the Great Recession kicked everybody in the guts, and the only people who have "recovered" are investment bankers and stock market gamblers, nursed along by the Federal Reserve combine. And although Black people make up 13.2% of the population, they receive approximately 32% of what the government shells out in welfare! Link: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/2/20/1279118/-Black-People-on-Welfare-Let-s-Not-Sugarcoat-It .... Do you think that maybe this is a clear indication that instead of "White privilege" what we are seeing, right before our eyes, is "Black privilege"...?!

 

Yes; and they make sure they get it, too, even if it means they will continue to be dependent and not build up Social Security credits--so then they finally go on SSI disability without paying into Social Security and those of us trying to live on SS after a lifetime of paying into it get screwed again by the non-tax-paying sobs.

 

I am aware of how the militant black leadership has denigrated the IQ testing process as they continue their militant march to dumb down our school systems so that all are "equal", even if it means our corporations will then undercut us all by recruiting employees from abroad.

Of course the IQ system does not test for all abilities and of course we could do better on this aspect, but we never will because black denialism that there are any differences whatsoever (while continuing to take over the most lucrative sports positions) has had a chilling effect on experimentation in the field. For all we know, there could be several other areas in which some blacks excel.

I suppose you did not notice the link I placed for Notme regarding the super-intelligence of some ethnic groups in Africa? Maybe you could get a few of them to play babymaker in the inner cities, and discourage the 30-somethings presently in that role impregnating all the 14 and 15 year old girls that don't have the sense to at least choose wisely so their kids have a smart Daddy...not to mention giving some of them HIV. The white establishment has done all it can to lock the worst of them up, but it seems the black component of the population is not doing its share of policing to protect its young females--not to mention, counter-productively egging on that mentally limited component to shoot cops.

By the way, you don't "train" intelligent people, you educate them. "Training" only results in rote learning with no ability to extrapolate, and is suitable only for those incapable of doing so.

 

As I said....there is not much in the way of excuses now.

But discrimination still exists.

AboveAlpha

 

White Privilege is to support the
Less Than White Peoples from Themselves,
famine, plague, etc.

 

I certainly hope not.

I'm sick of this "white man's burden" carp.

I'm having enough trouble shouldering my own burden.

 

Well YOU are just short of melanin