America's sexual deviation & decadence over the line

Is it possible a person who advocates for sexual morality may be in either a small way or a large way, or at one time acted, sexually immoral? Dude. Really?

 

I doubt she is a virgin. But that's none of my business. I like her sarcasm and humor. I like her opinions. That's a very misogynistic question in my opinion. Would you ever ask that about a man?

Did you ask that about Sen. Graham?

 

So if the research does not arrive at the conclusion you wish it to then the research must have been biased... You didn't even review the studies or the data - dismissed because they did not advance your fraudulent agenda.

Pathetic

Why don't you post the research that concluded homosexuality was a mental illness as per your claim. Please please quote Whitehead

Which directly refutes your prior claim that no new research was done.

Changing social norms simply means that the original classification was made not due to science but due to the "moral" and religious views of the times. Once the voices of religion were removed science took hold. People were classified as witches under your standard.


I'm still waiting for your first source so please stop with the lie of posting it again.

Homosexuality does not, and did not meet the qualifications of a mental illness.

 

Well not being a scientist, I don't see a purpose in dissecting various studies that are biased. But I do want to make a distinction between biased studies and actual scientific research. We know that there isn't any scientific research that say studied the brain and found out, hey, gays are just like straights and therefore they really are normal! We know that they didn't find a virus that causes people to be gay. If they did, I guess we'd be looking for a vaccination for that virus, right?

So I'm willing to stand by my assertion that there is no scientific research that would have caused the APA to remove homosexuality from it's list of mental DISORDERS (not illness).

Now as far as those studies, like I said, they went into doing the research with predetermined outcomes. It was for the purposes of political correctness and the liberal agenda. This is undeniable. Even your own post confirms that.

And lastly, your post once again assumes facts not in evidence. "Changing social norms simply means that the original classification was made not due to science but due to the "moral" and religious views of the times. Once the voices of religion were removed science took hold." I don't remember "witches" being a classification of mental disorder. Nor adultery, or thievery, sloth, vanity, gluttony or pride ect ect. Why just the sin of homosexuality and not other sins?

Why did they vote on the question, "Homosexuality does not, and did not meet the qualifications of a mental illness"? And why did 40% not agree?

 

Amen, brother. Amen. Stupefying, expensive, destructive, even deadly. 35,000,000+ unborn babies murdered since the lie of Roe V. Wade legally sanctioned killing helpless babies in their mother's wombs.

 

Today in France white genocide is violent.

[/url]
https://audioboom.com/channels/4392338.rss
https://audioboom.com/channels/4392338.rss

 

Evidance of bias please, you know, a source for the excrement that you peddle

Yes, if there was a virus that was making people gay I'm sure (almost) everyone would agree a cure would need to be found. But it isn't, so there isn't.

Ok, please post the sources that show homosexuality was classified as such due to rationed science and not due to the political influence of the church.

It does no such thing. Source that the research was biased

You mean facts backed with sources? Read up on it. There are several articles (some from the APA itself) that show the reasoning of interference in the medical community. All of which you will deny or ignore as you did the last few sources I provided, so I won't bother.

90% could have disagreed, if the science does not back up the claim it must be removed. 50 + - of Americans believe Obama is a good president. Does that make it true?

So far you have provided zero links to certify your claims
You have stated that nothing will change your opinions which means they are not based on reasoning but on bias

 

So your basic argument is that children might be brainwashed into being gay?

Oh if only it were as simply as choosing, but sadly, it doesn't work that way.

 

I don't really think homosexuality is a mental illness. Something is tweaked there, but not sure what it is. At the same time, there are different levels and degrees of "mental illness." IOW, you don't have to be drooling all over yourself or an absolute psychopath to be suffering from some form of mental illness.

 

If anybody recognizes the melody the Jim Bohannon show opened with last night please let me know the title. They played it just before discussing the Niece attack and about every 10 minutes there after. I woke up at 11:00 to that. First I heard the news.
This is one of those moments I'll remember the rest of my life. We were in the Berlin Post theatre when the NCO stopped
"Mr Roberts" and said the president was shot and most likely dead. We went on alert the next morning.
On 9/11 I was talking to the local TV station when she said a plane had just run into the world trade center and they had to get it on the air.

 

`
I don't think it's a mental illness either. I call it a "genetic predisposition", but I'm bias that way.

 

Amen brother, Amen.
Look to this thread as a fine example.

Anyone in this day and age thinking gay is a choice corroborates it.

 

How are children being harmed in any way? As long as nothing obscene or sexual is depicted in the film, then I don't see how the portrayal of a romantic relationship beteeen two people of the same gender is going to affect a child in any way.

The bottom line here, however, is that the responsibility of raising your child lies with no one but yourself. If you dislike certain moral or social sensibilities, or if you think a movie is inappropriate in any way, it is up to you to not allow your children to watch it. Parenting = not a studio's job.

 

I posted the link that shows the vote count of the APA which shows that it was a 60 to 40% vote. Sorry if you didn't see that link. I won't post it again. I don't care if y'all see it at this point. You are unreasonable; there is no sense in reasoning with you. You are committed to your ideology. Nothing will ever change your mind, nothing.

The link you posted admitted that it was "changing social norms" which is codeword for political correctness. The other posters link which supposedly supported his claim but had a biographical of the scientist which stated that they had a relationship with the gay community and wanted to do research that backed up her feelings for the gay community. She was a social justice warrior. She had a political agenda and a bias. She had a pre-determined outcome.

Sorry, that's not science.

 

No. That's not the point.

We know it doesn't work that way.

Any other strawman arguments or is your reading comprehension really that bad?

 

Yet another person that is either missing the point completely - unintentionally oblivious; or just intentionally ignoring the issue because of their own political prejudices. Either way - I don't care. Can't save everyone especially from themselves.

- - - Updated - - -

Thank you.

Who thinks that? Nobody I know.

 

"at one time"? So Ann stopped having sex-outside-of-marriage 20 years ago???

- - - Updated - - -

Oh, so when it's a Rightwinger like Coulter....."sexual decadence" is "none of your business"

I see.



- - - Updated - - -

You need to get out more.

Go to the Gay Rights Forum here at PF and post an OP saying "Homosexuality is not a choice"....you'll meet some.

 

I don't care what anyone does in their bedrooms. Ann Coulter, gay people, wierdos, whatever. Not my business. Never said it was my business.

As an orientation, homosexuality may or may not be a choice. As for sex, it is a choice.

 

So because you can't be bothered to refute a opposing position with arguments, you refuse to address it at all.

 

There is nothing to refute. If you have no problem with exposing children to adult sexual issues that's on you.

 

You don't have to expose them to anything. The parent has full control over what the child watches.

 

So still zero sources. Please prove that homosexuality was correctly classified and that the classification would stand up to today's criteria. Yet again you are left deflecting, lying, or simply ignoring fact.

And that 40% of the votes (read religious indoctrination) refused to follow their own criteria should mean what exactly? Hold that same vote today and you would ignore the results. All you have proven was that the initial vote that made homosexuality a mental illness was fraudulent, based on ideology instead of medical evidence. Good job!

You only accept what perpetuates your agenda, it's painfully obvious to all here except the anti-gay posters.

 

As often liberals use answering phraseology to imply a conservative has said something he didn't. I did not mention cartoons. That was someone else's post. So if anybody has a weak sexual identity there is no reason to think it's me. I didn't say that. My autism makes it appear that I'm asexual.
My point was that since a significant minority are ambivalent but leaning homosexual it is necessary for society to pressure them to act out heterosexually.
Also promotion/normalization of homosexuality is part of the genocide program against white's world wide. Abortion of course is another attack on the white birthrate.
Under the U.N. convention on genocide, article 2 d, any program to reduce the birth rate of a racial, religious or ethnic group is a crime of genocide.
http://www.hrweb.org/legal/genocide.html
The other major part is; "Asia for Asians, Africa for African's, white countries for everyone".
www.whiterabbitradio.net

 

Clown fish are transexual. Marlin should have become a woman and Nemo a man had the show kept with reality.

 

I'm mildly autistic as well as bi-polar. My autism and bi-polar traits corilate with creativity. I was an engineer.
Other related condstions are aspergers syndrome and schizophrenia. My grandmother was schizophrenic. All four corilate with creativity.
Homosexuality is another mental issue that corilates with creativity.
What makes homosexuality stand out is it's exemption from classification as a mental disorder. Even though if everyone or even a majority of people turned out homosexual it would be the death of that society.
There is a reason for that exemption and it relates to the world wide program to eliminate whites by reducing their birth rate, mixing them with third world populations and in extreme cases encouraging their killing.
The attack this week in France was part of the violent campaign of genocide.
(see Jim Bohannon show 7/14/16)
https://audioboom.com/channels/4392338.rss