America's sexual deviation & decadence over the line

"Today, too, there are adults with AS who are successful as professors, lawyers, physicians, artists, authors, and educators.”

But functioning homosexuals are not classified as mental c ases like auspergesr, autistics, bi-polars, schizophrencis. WHY???

 

What's your take on Southpark?

 

I find it hilarious, why?

 

It is the most impartial offender and the pinnacle of parady and satire. They make fun of absolutely everything and everyone.
And the show is comprised in a week which keeps it very relevant. It also is free from the restrictions say SNL has to abide by.
Sothpark viewers are mostly under 40.

 

Yet the shows creators and writers are 40 or over, and have made a mint off that, "impartial offender and the pinnacle of parody and satire." Plus, the show is still in production. Making fun of absolutely everything and everyone is part of why makes it so hilarious, the show isn't afraid of being politically incorrect. The people who are opposed to South Park were probably the same people who grew up to Tom and Jerry, and were opposed to Scooby-Doo.

 

That the show has survived for this long and appeals to primarily thise under 40 speaks volumes. Watchers aren't easily offended, viewers wouldn't get the show ir be entertained by it if they weren't somewhat keen on contemporary affairs. Viewers aren't intimidated by having thier views challenged and criticized. I personally think that is pretty fantastic. Viewers also understand stereotypes and agendas. They are substantially more informed than their parents and are exposed to a much more dynamic record of news.

- - - Updated - - -

What's your favorite episode? Mine is the first season's Thanksgiving episode and the aliens from the future taking all the jobs...haha.

 

Being concerned one way one the other regarding anyone's sexuality is probably grounds for a diagnosis of mental illness right there.

Obsessive Compulsive Nosiness, sometimes in conjunction with Moral Indignation Syndrome.

As usual laughter is generally recommended as salve if not cure.

 

I understand that. That is not the question at hand. Why is it that it is okay for Hollywood to inject the subject into children's films? Why should the parent have to make a choice as to whether or not this children's cartoon is unfit for their child? Why is this acceptable? And how many parents are even aware of the subject matter being introduced into these children's cartoons? Maybe for them, they don't have full control over what the child watches because they weren't informed? What is the point in even doing this? They are children. Leave the children alone you stupid Hollywood perverts and weirdos.

 

I provided a link, unlike you. But the facts are available on the internet. You can Google them yourself and either prove that I am right, or if you really think you are right, you could use the internet to prove me wrong. Gee, you haven't done that...I wonder why?

Why do you ask me to prove your argument? Why is it you can't prove your argument. I am not here to do your homework and to prove myself wrong because you can't.

What exactly did I deflect on? What did I lie about? What did I ignore? Be specific. I can't defend against nonspecific generalizations and character attacks when you don't provide details.

No, what I have proven is my basic assertion that there was a vote that removed homosexuality from the list of mental disorders in 1973. That is factual and irrefutable. The rest of what you are saying is just a lie or completely unsupportable suppositions.

Did they hold that vote today? Have they voted on it since 1973? Why not?

My agenda...what is that? The truth? Facts? My desire for perverts and weirdos in Hollywood to leave children out of their sick sexual fantasies?

 

would it being socially acceptable for women to simply come up to us and us ask to practice with them, just for fun, solve some deviation and decadence?

 

Luckily for fish they poop and pee anywhere. There are no fish bathrooms to get confused about who should go in what bathroom, which one is for males, which one is for females, which one is for fish that are males that think they are females.

- - - Updated - - -

Sure, that question is not misogynistic in anyway either.

 

Would you agree, nice girl friends do?

 

So still zero sources.
I have provided three in this thread alone that you either outright ignored or dismissed as invalid because they disagreed with your premise. You are the one that claimed homosexuality was a mental illness, I even went as far as to show it does not and did not meet the classification - which you ignored and then focused on the 60/40 vote as evidance of... I'm not sure what point you were attempting to make there.

Homosexuality was added due to political pressure and removed due to evidance.

 

That is exactly the question at hand. Since nothing is forced upon you or your child, no one's rights are being infringed upon, and studios maintain the freedom to produce whatever films they like. Beyond that, it is your right and responsibility to determine what your children watch. No one gets to censor or police entertainment.

Hollywood is under no obligation to comply with your own personal beliefs, and it especially cannot be expected to do so when your beliefs represent the minority instead of the dominant views and morals of your time.Why should your viewpoint be placed over the viewpoint of 60% of Americans? By that logic, we should remove portrayals of interracial relationships from films, because some people (40% of Mississippi Republicans, for example) dislike interracial marriage.

 

Big lie. Huge lie.

Children molested by homosexuals have a very greatly increased incidence of homosexuality.
One of the mantras of the homosexual community is "recruit, recruit, recruit."

The former president of the Los Angeles Chapter of National Organization for Women, Tammy Bruce, wrote a book titled The Death of Right and Wrong.

It is a scathing indictment of liberalism. She deeply resents being seduced by a lesbian when she was only 16 years old. I know people with similar experiences. Sickening, truly sickening how the left continues to sexually abuse and molest youngsters and then claim it's "hereditary" that they are confused and brainwashed by perverts.

 

Same irrelevant arguments. Same mischaracterizations/Strawman arguments.

I posted one source. I'm so sick of you lying, I'm so fed up with it here, here is the post. Here is the link. This is irrefutable. Maybe now you'll stop.

Now, there are many more sources that have the very same information. So prove me wrong. Go ahead. You haven't yet. Because you can't.

 

Okay, you still aren't getting the point just like so many others who come up with stupid ignorant strawman arguments. I'm not going to bother to entertain any more of these. If you want to discuss the subject, fine.

Now, someone else played the race card in this discussion. There is no comparison between this and the experience and history of slavery and racism against blacks. Using the race card in this instance is racist and I will continue to call people out who do this. Plus, you just make up fake statistics off of the top of your head. That's even worse.

Republicans, whether they are from Mississippi or New Hampshire, are the party that ended slavery, ended segregation, ended Jim Crow, and ended the democrat party's prejudice and abuse of blacks to included destroying their terrorist wing the KKK. You want to show faux outrage over people who were against interracial marriage, make sure you are blaming the right people. That fight was against racist democrats who opposed that.

 

Your source does not support your claim that homosexuality is a mental illness.
No one is arguing that it was not classified as such for five whole years! before the torture of "treatment", likely supported by your 40%, was overruled by the medical community.

Try again. Prove your claim that homosexuality is a mental illness. Hundreds of medical organizations around the world await your findings

 

Seize one one sentence to avoid the rest of the post.
Shows you cannot even respond to basic observation

Why should your wishes overrule the freedoms of studios.
Should we arrest the producers if they do not comply with your view of morality?

 

No, my sources support my claim that homosexuality was a mental disorder. That is a fact no matter how many stupid strawman arguments you can come up with. That is a fact you cannot dispute, and have not even attempted to dispute.

That 40% was the medical community. Of course no one is arguing that it wasn't classified as a mental disorder because that is a known fact that is irrefutable.

Strawman.

I don't want to play with the stupid strawman arguments that he makes up or yours. And yeah, I have been pointing out racism of the left and democrats because they have hijacked the civil rights movement and taken blacks for granted. Every dollar that is spent on other special interests like homosexuals, transgenders, women, illegal immigrants and so on is money that isn't helping the black community where those funds should be spent. That is racist!

I wasn't suggesting any new laws. I was appealing to a sense of decency. I guess that is something people on the left have lost.

 

Your source does not support the false claim that homosexuality is a mental illness as per your original claim

Of which the majority disagreed. I would wager the 40% partially encompassed the shrinks that tortured gay men with shock therapy.

I am beginning to believe you have no clue what that word means.

Black people have made their own beds. Their "plight" of killing one another is becoming irrelevant to most.

Your version of morality is represented by a small percent of the population. Gay rights support is nearing 70%, transgender rights is flowing the same pattern

Plus animals can have both sexes and some are capable of changing their sex as needed. All your worries are noting but a bunch of bigoted fearmongering.

 

You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

 

You keep accussing people of not getting your point, yet you vastly misinterpreted mine and have completely failed to address any of my arguments.

Pure speculation. I mentioned opposition to interracial marriage as an example of another unpopular opinion about marriage and relationships that is not currently supported by the majority. The assumption that I made any other comparison or implied anything that you're suggesting is unsubstantiated, a strawman argument, and ad hominum on your part.

My question was and still is whether a group, and especialy a minority group, should get to dictate what films do and do not portray based on their own beliefs. When your rights are not being infringed upon in any way, nor your freedom of choice and your freedom to practice your religion, why should the movie industry comply with your morals rather than those of the majority of the population?

My statistics are factual and not "made up" in the slightest. The first figure comes from a PPP survey conducted among registered Mississipi Republicans. Among the questions asked was whether interracial marriage should be legal or illegal, and the results determined that 46% of the voters thought it should be illegal, 40% thought it should be legal, and 14% were unsure. This information is available at the PPP website and can be found elsewhere online, though if you like I can provide a link.

My second figure sterms from the Pew Global Attitudes Project of 2013. It is extremely easy to find online and determines that 60% of Americans believe that homosexuality should be accepted by society, while 33% believe it should not. Another Pew poll, conducted on the subject of same-sex marriage, showed very similar stats: 55% support and 37% opposition.

Defending Republicans to me is pointless since I never asserted nor insinuated anything negative about them as a group. I was merely driving home my point by using the beliefs of a minority of people as an example. If you don't like the statistics, don't blame me.

 

Yeah well the KKK polling organization conducted a poll of democrats from Mississippi and 90% said they want their slaves back if you can believe that. So much for unsupported unsubstantiated facts. What, they didn't ask that question of Mississippi democrats? What about black women? Do you know what percentage of them are against interracial marriage?

I don't believe all these fake polls. I was told the same thing about gay marriage. I of course live in a very liberal state. I teasingly call it Occupied Mexifornia. We voted to reject gay marriage twice. TWICE! It still doesn't have a majority in favor of it here if you ask me, or we would have voted on it again.

Taking from blacks by hijacking the civil rights movement and then comparing blacks and gays or blacks and illegal immigrants is racist. I'll be glad to call liberals out on their racism every time.

 

It means what it means. What do you think it means? Maybe you don't know what it means since you are the one who doesn't understand.