National Security Advisor Flynn resigns amid controversy over Russia contacts

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by zbr6, Feb 13, 2017.

  1. bois darc chunk

    bois darc chunk Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2015
    Messages:
    8,626
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Chaffetz said Flynn's investigation is taking care of itself and won't commit to a Congressional hearing. Makes me wonder if he's been waved off, for now. The FBI didn't want to sign off on telling Trump about Flynn at first stating it could hamper their investigation. Seems to me that if warning Trump about Flynn would hamper an FBI investigation, more than Flynn is being investigated. Of course, that's just MNSHO.
     
  2. GraspingforPeace

    GraspingforPeace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    14,162
    Likes Received:
    1,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's literally the President's Article II power in the Constitution to discuss treaties.
     
  3. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :roll: Obama wasn't whispering to Medvedev that he would be able to "discuss" a treaty after the midterms. Presumably he could have done that at any time.

    Just face it...you are stuck defending Obama for doing what Flynn supposedly did. LOL
     
  4. Silver Surfer

    Silver Surfer Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    Messages:
    6,871
    Likes Received:
    2,233
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Mike Pence takes over and he is a globalist neocon despite trying to sell himself as a conservative. He is their men and they're actively undermining Trump from the word go. All those leaks are coming from within.
     
  5. GraspingforPeace

    GraspingforPeace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    14,162
    Likes Received:
    1,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ...The difference being that Obama was literally the President while Flynn held NO position in the at the time current government's structure. How the hell do you just skip over that blatant divergence from reality? Oh... right. Republican.

    And by the way, that's actually exactly what he was doing. Missile defense deals were being written that worried Russia, Obama said that he could talk with them more about it after the midterm. Politically Machiavellian? Sure. Outside of the acting President's role and power? Absolutely not.
     
  6. cupAsoup

    cupAsoup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2015
    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Incompetence. Clearly, that's the reason he was fired a second time. He's developing quite a track record as a failure.

    Read up on the Logan act. It was the timing of his call that is the issue. Not to mention straight out lying to the VP. He's clearly in violation.Perhaps if lying, corruption, and deceit wasn't par for the course for this administration, he might have thought before acting.

    It's not the mainstream media or liberals fault that he's a fool who is now out of a job, so you can stop your petulant whining about that. As far as the leak, you should again look to the incompetent administration and their laughable and ironic process for vetting their own staff. Maybe extreme vetting isn't really a thing. That, or the administration doesn't know what they're doing. I'll go with the latter.
     
  7. Silver Surfer

    Silver Surfer Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    Messages:
    6,871
    Likes Received:
    2,233
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's fantastic. A well informed poster. Would you be so kind as to elaborate then how many times a citizen Obama acted unconstitutionally during his reign as an emperor? How many times he was supposed to be impeached? An honest answer.
     
  8. cupAsoup

    cupAsoup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2015
    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd probably go with he's just so incompetent and didn't know. This has Bannon written all over it, who plays trump for the fool he is. Trump's too bust lounging in his bathrobe and watching fox news to be bothered with the details of running the country.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Conway seems like a safe bet. Bannon will likely barricade himself in some white house bunker and have to be removed by force. You have to wonder the conversation she had with herself when the trump job opened. Something to the effect of, "Am i ready to forsake all credibility I may have had and sell my soul for this clown?"
     
  9. GraspingforPeace

    GraspingforPeace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    14,162
    Likes Received:
    1,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol, This pivoting is so blatant, and so, so feeble. We were talking about a specific thing, stop trying to muddy the waters with your endless distractions.
     
  10. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Already dealt with that.
    Obama had no more right to violate some law or protocol than Ray Flynn did. But, as pointed out, to Obama fan boys, he can do no wrong and do as he pleases.

    Having more "latitude" to change our missile policy is hardly the same thing as discussing it. Keep digging though.
     
  11. cupAsoup

    cupAsoup Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2015
    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok, so liberals make flynn contact the Russians and discuss sanctions before he held any formal office. Got it. Further, democrats made Flynn lie to the VP about the contents of his phone call he made in violation of the Logan act. Ok, got that as well.

    I know it's tough times being a trump apologist but it looks like you're not even trying anymore.
     
  12. gamewell45

    gamewell45 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    24,711
    Likes Received:
    3,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you could get the drug addict Linbaugh to off of his hydrocodone (or whatever pill or drug he's on) or brainless Sarah Palin (if she is not busy breaking up family fights or trying to figure out where Russia is located from her back yard) or yes, even the draft dodger Ted Nugent involved then I'd say yes because it would drive the lefties crazy. Crazy enough to get out next time and vote and send the righties packing.
     
  13. GraspingforPeace

    GraspingforPeace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    14,162
    Likes Received:
    1,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What law would Obama have violated?! Again, it's well within his Constitutional power, you know as President, to speak on diplomatic matters with diplomats.

    All that was said was that he would have more flexibility after the Midterm Election. He never committed to overturning anything. You're reaching into nothingness and grasping at empty space.
     
  14. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    110,206
    Likes Received:
    37,925
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Who was president in December?
     
  15. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,938
    Likes Received:
    27,453
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Fanboyism (partisanship) is terrible for politics, that's for sure. But 0bama fanboyism isn't the issue of the day now, is it? The shoe is on the other foot.
     
  16. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Stop with the red herrings over and over again. Not talking about Obama's speech, for the last time!
    We're talking about his promising the Russians he would have latitude after midterms to bend to their opposition in dismantling the missile shield that they wanted out of Poland, for instance. Stop with the weasel-like behavior.



    HE (Obama) was the one telling the Russian leader he would be able to act on their behalf when he had political cover. You are purposely obscuring the point of Obama's message to the hated Russians before they were hated by the left.
    I'm not going to tolerate and suffer through your repetitious blather any longer.
     
  17. gc17

    gc17 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    5,187
    Likes Received:
    2,015
    Trophy Points:
    113

    EVERYBODY knows phone calls are being monitored/recorded, have you ever heard of Snowden? I'm sure that Flynn knew but as the old saying goes 'it's not the crime ( there was none ) it's the cover up'. Flynn resigned which was appropriate, Dems would get a raise and a pension.
    You guys live on rumors, how about we wait for the facts, too hard, can't wait?
    Oh puhleez, you guys nominated a candidate that gave confidential/classified information to a housekeeper and the world.
     
  18. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It sure is the issue when Obama quislings want to continue to hold him to a different standard than they hold others.
    Obama is making himself part of this whole process (the delegitimizing of the presidency through his Organizing for Action).
     
  19. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Tough time? In what way? I really don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about Democrats beating themselves in the chest in righteous fury (they're on TV right now). Why? I remember seeing the same Democrats keeping mouthes shot when Hillary was investigated for much the same (*)(*)(*)(*).

    We'll be fine.
     
  20. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,953
    Likes Received:
    39,420
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Obama wasn't President in July 2008 when he met with foreign leaders about how an Obama White House would conduct it's foreign policy.
     
  21. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,850
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It is the height of hypocrisy and stupid blind partisan pomposity to worse yet excuse what Gen. Flynn did
    by equating it to what Hillary foolishly did. You excuse the fact that Flynn may very likely compromised the president of the United Sates by promissing the Russians something. We saw that Putin backed off imposing counter sanctions on us but why. Are going to claim that the KGB scum Turd found Jesus?

    Trumpeizdas are behaving like Traitors and that makes me sick.
     
  22. GraspingforPeace

    GraspingforPeace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    14,162
    Likes Received:
    1,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The President has the power to negotiate with foreign governments, end of story, bud. That is one of his Constitutional duties. Whether or not the Republican led Congress likes that is beyond the matter entirely. You're haphazardly trying to muddle the water while ignoring the most prescient difference between that incident and this one, General Flynn was not a part of the government at the time of his discussion with Russia. Trying to argue that Obama "undermined" the government when he was literally the Executive Power of this government is just ludicrous, but it's an entirely moot point to what we're actually discussing. Just pathetic whining and "Whataboutism".
     
  23. PARTIZAN1

    PARTIZAN1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2015
    Messages:
    46,850
    Likes Received:
    18,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    But did that meeting result in an enemy of the US to back off from responding to something that Bush did?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Obama's use of EO's is not an excuse for Flynn to have POSSIBLY committed treason.
     
  24. pmc

    pmc New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2012
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Earlier today, and to our complete surprise, no less, Nancy Pelosi joined in the chorus of angry liberals calling for further investigations into Trump's ties to the Kremlin. The House Minority Leader expressed her faux outrage via a statement posted to twitter calling for, among other things, "a bipartisan, independent, outside commission to fully investigate Russia's influence on the Administration and the election." Ironically, we "do not recall" Pelosi asking for an "independent commission" when actual, tangible evidence emerged proving that Hillary and her team intentionally ignored a Congressional subpoena calling for the preservation of email records...we assume she just forgot.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...ee-declines-calls-investigate-flynn-situation

    ===============================================================

    The question has been asked on some talk shows... How did Pelosi manage to accumulate a net worth of $100 million on a Congressional salary of only about $174,000 a year over the course of her terms?
    The numbers don’t add up! If you ask me it's Polosi who needs to be investigated!

    At this point she’ll be turning 80 in about 4 years! Enough already! Time to go Pelosi!

    Nancy Pelosi Net Worth
    http://net-worths.org/nancy-pelosi-net-worth/

    The current salary (2016) for rank-and-file members of the House and Senate is $174,000 per year.
    http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/congresspay.htm
     
  25. GraspingforPeace

    GraspingforPeace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Messages:
    14,162
    Likes Received:
    1,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did he make specific promises to the foreign leaders that went directly against Bush's policies at the time? If not, then this is a non-parallel.
     

Share This Page