The LEFT Fully Embraces Racism & Segregation

90th United States Congress
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jump to navigationJump to search
90th United States Congress
89th ←
→ 91st

United States Capitol (1962)
January 3, 1967 – January 3, 1969
Members 100 senators
435 representatives
Senate Majority Democratic
Senate President Hubert Humphrey (D)
House Majority Democratic
House Speaker John W. McCormack (D)
Sessions
1st: January 10, 1967 – December 15, 1967
2nd: January 15, 1968 – October 14, 1968
The 90th United States Congress was a meeting of the legislative branch of the United States federal government, composed of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. It met in Washington, D.C., from January 3, 1967, to January 3, 1969, during the last two years of the second administration of U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson.

The apportionment of seats in this House of Representatives was based on the Eighteenth Census of the United States in 1960. Both chambers had a Democratic majority.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/90th_United_States_Congress

...

By
Beatrix Lockwood
Updated June 16, 2020
Redlining, a process by which banks and other institutions refuse to offer mortgages or offer worse rates to customers in certain neighborhoods based on their racial and ethnic composition, is one of the clearest examples of institutionalized racism in the history of the United States. Although the practice was formally outlawed in 1968 with the passage of the Fair Housing Act, it continues in various forms to this day.

https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1951-2000/hh_1968_04_10/

I don't see where the left embraces racism or segregation since the 1960s.

 

Goldwater who had been a staunch supporter of the NAACP voted against the bill as written because he thought it wasn't constitutional not because he hated blacks. And after passing the Great Society programs LBJ was heard to mutter we'll have them damn D--------s voting Democrat for the next hundred years.

 

No, absolutely not, and you should know that. What are you trying to do here, anyway? Start a flame war?

 

Well, he lost the election. And the R party lost the black vote ever since.
Guess it was a bad move on his part 52 yrs ago.

Here is trumps black vote. 8%. Puny.

According to AP VoteCast, Trump won 8 percent of the Black vote, about a 2 percentage-point gain on his 2016 numbers (using the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, or CCES, a national survey of more than 50,000 confirmed voters, as a point of comparison).
https://www.vox.com/2020/11/4/21537966/trump-black-voters-exit-polls

 

Meanwhile his gain among Hispanic voters allowed him to very nearly carry the entire Rio Grand Valley usually 75% Democrat.

Note this would seem to indicate that a hell of a lot if Latinos aren't in favor of open borders.

 

I see. Deflecting the topic.
I have no idea what Latino favor in terms of borders. Most every American D or R or I, don't favor open borders. It's mostly a made up concept of the RW. Lying in fact.

 

And that example proves what?

And you claiming I don’t know anything is the ultimate irony.

 

I agree that it is the dems and the liberal horde that is holding smart and dedicated Blacks from run as Republicans. If a black person questions the notion of inbred racism they are torn to pieces, while the Black who have been elected as dems can spew hate for white people all they want.

 

Read post 117. Shouldn't need to repeat myself especially when the post you responded to is right below the one that refutes the idea that you're trying to present.

 

So what was wrong with Herman Cain?

 

How?

 

Had to look him up. Name sounded familiar but couldn't quite place it. Apparently he dropped out due to sexual misconduct charges. LINK: Herman Cain - Wikipedia

Not an uncommon thing to happen now a days. Funny how that always seems to happen right during election years though....even funnier that the allegations seem to disappear after elections...

 

See black employment rates under Trump.

 

Continuation from Obama.

 

I read post 117 and responded to post 117.
R's don't need to concern themselves about skin color, because 98%+ of R's are white. No concern needed.

 

Why?
Does it differ from in % from whites?

If you have a point to make, make it. And give a link to back up your point.

 

This legislation was the start to systemic racism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1968

The Fair Housing Act of 1968, which explicitly prohibited racial discrimination, put an end to legally sanctioned redlining policies like those used by the FHA. However, like racially restrictive covenants, redlining policies were difficult to stamp out and have continued even in recent years.
https://www.thoughtco.com/redlining-definition-4157858

...
"Systemic racism" describes how discriminatory actions show up in the American educational system, the economic system, the health care system, the criminal justice system and more. It's when individual attitudes of prejudice and bigotry are baked into the operations of cultural institutions. And as Fleming writes, “The consequences of systemic racism are vast — from the burgeoning racial wealth gap, political disenfranchisement, mass incarceration and racist immigration policies to microaggressions, racial profiling, racist media imagery and disparities in health, education, employment and housing.”
...
https://www.today.com/tmrw/what-systemic-racism-t207878

It will take 3 generation at least to end system/institutional racism. Especially after 150 yrs of it.

 

I already made my point black employment was at the lowest rate ever

 

Proof?
You made no point. You made a statement. The question is, did you make an accurate statement. Proving your statement will make it an accurate statement

.
While it is at record lows. So is all other ethincs at record lows.

But they are still the worst performing group.

 

Well the other poster answered my same post and you liked the post so from that we can assume you're not disputing it

 

You mean the post where the poster thanked Obama for bringing down black UE rates.
OK.

Thx Obama.

 

Obama did not have record black employment rates Trump also did many other things for African Americans something to do a neighborhood initiatives and college I'm posting from a cell phone at work right now and I do not know how to copy and paste from one if you want to know more about it you'll have to wait until I get back on my laptop

 

When it comes to black unemployment rates basically what your doing is after Obama got within one inch of the record finish line trump crossed the line and proclaimed victory. Obama did 99% of the work.

 

That's a nice opinion you have there Trump actually opened up the economy for people to go to work by doing away with all these onerous regulations that stifle business you can thank him Obama had nothing to do with that

 

Many blacks feel they need an avenue for voluntary separation from 'white' society (w/e that actually is...). And tho I'm not sure I understand why, I think it may yet be true. During segregation, black communities were independent, and they faired much better than they do now. Something similar, but based on voluntarism, might serve some of them well (because clearly many blacks also fair just fine in a diverse society). Whats going on here is a tacit recognition of that by our social establishment, and an agenda to guide and control it, as our establishment feels it must do with all things, which is likely a part of what blacks are ultimately trying to get away from. 'The left', aka, 'authoritarian bleeding-heartism' aka 'enforced meddlesome do-goodery' has a self-generated obligation to find a solution for these certain blacks that need to be able to isolate themselves into their own independent communities. The only problem is that it thinks it can, as usual, do it for them, and as such, is entirely missing the point and entirely failing to fix the actual problem. This is not a case of people needing help, this is a case of people needing to help themselves, and is thus a problem entirely unsuited to 'the left' being able to help in any meaningful way.