Maxine Waters on the Floyd trial: "We're looking for a guilty verdict." (Video)

First she starts off by saying right wingers are racist, then she says she wants a guilty verdict in the Floyd trial, then she says they need to be more confrontational.

1. If anyone is a racist, she is. Same with the hyenas she rolls with.

2. She wants a guilty verdict and not on manslaughter, but murder. We don't decide trials based up on what racists like Waters want.

3. She said the left needs to be more confrontational, that's a not so well hidden call for more violence.

Waiting for CNN's interpretation of Waters' comments.

https://twitter.com/AlphaNewsMN/status/1383645408765743108

 

The last thing they really want is MORE confrontation. Maybe she should think before she brays.

 

Oh well.

If any of her District's Voters have an issue with her statements in MN, then they are free to vote her out next year.
^Problem solved.

 

She should be prosecuted and imprisoned for subversion.

 

I am sure you feel the same about Marjorie Taylor Green... Uh oh.

 

But that's difffffffffferent!

Idiots and their ilk just don't understand their hypocrisy.

 

Of course, I do.

If Greene can CON the voters of her District into giving her another term, there is nothing that can be done.

And, the same goes with Whackjobs like Gaetz, Boebert, Brooks, Etc...

If her District's Voters want to be represented by MT Greene (A Lightning Rod/Laughingstock with Blatantly Glaring Mental Health Issues) that is certainly within their rights to give her another term.

 

You're just being coy. Bless your heart!

Green got the "justice" that you and your ilk wanted for what she had said long before re-election time.

But now, you (and probably your ilk) don't want the same treatment for what that hag Waters did---which was worse than what Green did---and just want to leave it up to the bozo's that live in her district to decide.

Is that about right?

 

if anyone wonders why black kids choose to fight with the police at every opportunity, now you know why. Waters is not the one catching a bullet for her bad advice.

 

She was inciting a riot. She is also a racist in the purest definition of the word. But if people in her district of Los Angeles want her to represent them, who am I to say it's wrong?

 

Well said and exactly.

In any event, I would be in favor of the District getting a New Rep in 2022 (when Waters will be 84).

Signs of senility (and unfiltered statements) have become more frequent

 

she appears to be inciting terror riots

looting is not civil disobedience.

 

LOL Aunt Maxine's district isn't where she's inflaming tensions. Chose "inflame" because Waters won't be satisfied til the city, not her city, is burned to the ground. Maxine's sheep will still be able to buy food at the corner grocery, and get their prescription medicines at the corner drug stores.

 

When Pres Trump rallied tens of thousands of right-wingers, who have contributed to a total of zero riots over the last decade, with words like 'peacefully protest' and 'obey law enforcement', the left decreed he directly incited an insurrection even though 99.9% of those tens of thousands of protesters did nothing but stand around.

When, after a decade that saw hundreds of full blown left-wing riots in general, and 3 nights of left-wing riots in this specific area where the majority of people are actively engaged in riot activities (looting, arson, destruction, assaults, etc), Rep Waters commands people to create confrontations, the left ignores her.

Hypocrisy.

 

Who is she going to blame, Trump, white supremacists, George Washington? My guess that she'll say any attempt to tie her to any violence that occurs is racist.

 

Max-scene Waters Whippin' 'em up.

IT’S ONLY AN “INSURRECTION” IF THE NARRATIVE REQUIRES IT TO BE:

 

Do you say the same thing for Republicans? I noticed you use this defence for Democrats so I will expect you to say this for Republicans too.

It's a double standard to have a oppinion on Republicans but for Democrats they just get a "Oh well".

 

I'm sure that if the LA republicans have a problem in MN and want to vote for someone else, that would be fine too.

 

A "double standard"?

Yeah? And, so what?

Anyway, back to Waters, hopefully her mindless rants won't be taken too seriously by potential agitators .

 

1. No, she didn't. Learn your syntax!

2. Your opinion.

 

She is unimportant & waffles a lot. I don't think anyone cares, tbh.

 

Exactly and Agreed.

I think the ONLY people who pay attention to her (and her unhinged rants) are members of the RW looking for Faux Outrage material.

 

This woman represent everything wrong with America.

 

They bitched about things they imagine Trump said yet remain silent when she DIRECTLY CALLED FOR at the very least, mob harrassment of elected officials in public. Might as well say a straight up call for violence as that's a tiny hair next to mob harassment.