Texas 6-week abortion ban takes effect after Supreme Court inaction

lying? I'm just repeating what you said in the previous post and asking questions

 

No not lying, outright lying. Because you have been unable to source any of your opinions and crayon logic has been utilized several times including using what doctors do to determine death to show when life begins (even though it begins at conception). You are confusing alive with life.

Direct quote me where I said “we need abortions for minority population control” and “humans with failed organs aren't humans”.

Maybe it is just a failure of basic reading comprehension

 

Last I checked a born person has functioning organs not just electrical signals in the heart (not cardiac rhythm).

a born person has functioning organs?
and when they are born with out all organs functioning are they not human?

I hope y’all are ready for both the minority birth rate (who make up the bulk of abortions) as well as the crime rate (which unwanted children / children born into poverty make a significant portion of) to skyrocket.

so the truth rears its ugly head
this isn't about women's rights but minority population control as Margret Sanger the founder or Plan Parenthood an eugenic referred to them as undesirables, human weeds and she used that same argument why we need abortion to cut down on minority births
thank you for expositing who the true racist are

 

Don't know what you are going for here.
Women know what they are doing when they have sex, what can happen after sex, what they have to go through during pregnancy, what they have to go through during birth, and what they go through during an abortion.

I never in anyway insinuated that they don't understand. They understand, and understand better than men do.

Children and adults are independent human beings that exist on their own. They are very different from a fetus.

Yes I support laws. Many of them.

Don't need to do that. Don't need to physically force them. You can force them using laws, fines, and prison.

No it was a different person that compared vaccines to abortions, not me. I did explain the difference though.

What are you talking about man? I find these statements funny but I don't understand. Giraffes and fireballs?

If a woman chooses on her own, to give birth, that woman needs to be responsible for her choice.

 

Again, it is a reading compression issue or an outright lie. I am leaning more towards reading comprehension issue due to the leaps in logic you just made — again, understandable when your logic is what you have displayed so far.

I am sorry the grasp on basic data metrics is so difficult.

 

and that is why i asked question for you to clarify those remarks because they sure in the hell are implying what I suspect

and your argument you used about minorities and why we need legal abortions is the same dam argument the racist white supremist Margret Sanger the eugenics founder of PP the one that called minorities undesirables, and human weeds used
its not just a coincidence both of you used the same argument
you and that white supremist racist think a like

 

Stating fact isn’t an implication of anything.

I have a rule not to argue with fools. Take care

 

very telling how you won't explain how you and that white supremist both had the same argument when it comes to minorities and abortions
as expected run away when your true intentions are exposed

 

Oy! another Furphy!

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3884362/

 

Hmmmmm - interesting demographics

 

killing a baby isn't medical

so if my doctor and I decide to kill my 5 year old nobody can say anything about that?

Yet accurate.

yeah that's not based on race but I'm not a bigot so I wouldn't have made that statement

no they're not. If you get pregnant it's because of decisions you made not the state telling you you must make babies.

And if the state doesn't make them become pregnant the state cannot force them to stay pregnant.

That's actually nature that does that.

I prefer to respond to the point in a lot of the times people type a lot of diatribe that has nothing to do with the point and I'm not quoting that.

 

okay so newborn is not much different than a fetus seeing that they go from fetus to newborn in an instant so why can't I take my newborn and stab it in the face until it dies

No law requires women to get pregnant.

Why do you support laws that Force a mother to be a mother why can't she just take her newborn and stab it in the face until it dies?

if the thing inside of the woman when she's pregnant isn't a baby or an unborn baby which some people call a fetus what the hell is it?

At what point does it magically become human?

why do you want to force women to be mothers they can just kill their child what's the difference you don't have to hear it scream when it's in the womb?

What is she have to hurry up and kill it before it's born why do you want to force women to be mothers for 18 years you're worse than I am.

 

Killing a baby isn’t medical, no.
Aborting a zygote is however

A five year old does reside inside you

So if you break your arm due to your own negligence and the state refuses to allow you to get medical treatment for it they are not forcing a specific outcome?

That the state is mimicking old laws to catch runaway slaves in an effort to skirt around the constitution is even more sickening.

 

They are consistent uninformed — or lying
I don’t know whether to blame our media or our public education system.

 

that's just killing a baby. Fancy words to disconnect yourself emotionally from it.

abortion isn't medical treatment it's killing a baby.

They don't have to skirt around the Constitution abortion isn't constitutional.

 

Medical terminology

How is an abortion preformed if not medically?

Then why are they doing so in this very law?
Abortion is absolutely constitutional as per SCOTUS precedent.

 

for killing a baby you can pretend it doesn't mean that but that's what it means.

it's no more medical procedure then slaughtering a cow

Abortion isn't constitutional you need to read up on the RVW.

What Texas is doing is challenging it. This is how you change Court decisions it's happened before.

 

So how many people in society are you allowed to hurt? Obviously you think hurting some people is okay (your quote was “and maybe people close to her” not to mention the baby she INTENTIONALLY murders. So how many am I allowed to hurt when I’m not intentionally hurting anyone and in fact there’s no way to prove that I’ve hurt anyone if I have the virus.

 

Words have meanings. Just because you don’t like those meanings doesn’t mean they are invalid. Calling a rapidly dividing fertilized egg a baby is like calling a teenager a toddler.

What makes the diploid cell (that will potentially become a baby) more important than the mother especially when that mother has to risk financial and bodily injury during the process? Why does this zygote have more rights to its body than she does?

Again, how is an abortion preformed if not medically?

It is currently constitutional. If it was not constitutional then it would be unconstitutional and thus banned.

 

Well then who cares if she takes that baby after it’s born and throws it off her roof? It’s just a life right? Who cares if someone shoots her in the face on her day of birth and kills them both. It’s just two lives right?

 

Already sourced. If you’re going to post at least pay attention.

 

Maths is simple the more people you hurt the more unethical it is

 

It is a person under law at that point and an actual “baby” whereas this



is difficult to define as such

BTW apologies for not completing the discussion on “abortion as a method of birth control” as I am afraid I fell asleep

oh! And BTW do you think the teen mothers of abandoned babies should be prosecuted?

 

Interesting. How many abortions due to birth control were there last year?

 

Not a problem happens to me all the time getting older sucks.

You mean abandoning at a hospital or church? No. If you mean just like throwing him in a trash can absolutely.