Most Americans (71%) Oppose Transgender Agenda

The more extreme they get, the better off we are.

 

I'm beginning to think you don't know what the act of jerking off involves. Hint...it's not the act of dressing in drag
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

Republicans will still figure out how to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. They're great like that.
The people are with them on this topic so they'll have to go too far to ensure they lose.
I suspect they'll try to control what people do in private or specifically adult only areas and if/when they do? They're the bad guys.

 

I was just providing information. Take it or leave it. However, that drop of blood confirms the information I provided.

 

We shall see. This just gets added to the long list of social policies progressives are trying that are falling flat on their faces.

 

How did you draw that conclusion from what I actually said? Odd.

 

You scorned the idea we should pay attention to European scientists

 

I didn't say anything about Muslims.
I don't approve of rhetoric that calls for the killing of anyone.

 

I can be argued that any ruling by the Supreme Court is political. Much like the original ruling was political. I my opinion this Supreme Court is simply falling in line with the constitution and ruled correctly for states rights. This does not mean I am 100% pro life. But there is a point it goes from a medical procedure to something that is morally wrong, and that is debatable. But my stance has always been the the government has no business funding abortions.

 

Is a Gay or heterosexual transphobic for not wanting to date a transgender?

 

Scorned? Again, I suspect you are projecting. I'm capable of taking one group of scientists conclusions with a grain of salt, especially when that group doesn't have the luxury of a consensus among the majority of scientists. You merely made the statement absent any citations supporting your claim. That's odd.

 

Your opinion, one I don't share.

So you say.

Me, too.

That's why they aren't necessarily harmed. It isn't the reason I think there should be no state law banning "drag" shows in public schools.

Not my view. I wouldn't want someone masturbating in front of students even if most of them would have no idea what the person was doing.

I don't want sexual activity in front of children. You seem to have a much wider net on that than I do, so I don't know when we would agree on whether some act is sexual in nature.

Correct.

There are a lot of things that have changed in public perception over the years and I think
"drag" is one of them. What was once an edgy challenge to convention has devolved into entertainment. In some ways it celebrates acceptance.

Ask trans, gays, etc. if their life would have been easier if they were a heterosexual cisgender. Ask them if who they are is a choice or rather an expression of who they discovered themselves to be.

Did you decide to be heterosexual? I didn't. I just realized one day on a deeply emotional level that females took on a new, important dimension. Early on, I knew I quite liked them as people. I was off on the life journey of cisgender adulthood. No choice. Women just flew on the radar. They were there and that was that.

Recruiting? No. Trans, gays, etc. are finding likeminded people for partners, friends and the intimate relations cisgenders enjoy with each other.

 

Chain of logic is like if I see a guy go into a bathroom with a baby in him arms, he is definitely going to show that baby his butthole. There is no other reason to take a baby in a bathroom. Chain of logic.

 

Take it or leave it? I am just trying to have a respectful discussion with you about the simplest way to define a woman. I didn’t realize you’d feel I was challenging you, because I am not.

 

Remember, this was about why Muslims may get an easy ride. More than a few Muslims believe homosexuals should be put to death.

 

Above, Langleyman clarified his position and I think we agree to disagree.
But interesting. You appear to be stating that people should not try to apply logic to a given argument. Good luck with that.

 

I think, It’s a very odd conclusion that was drawn from what you actually said.

 

My apology for missing where you defined the term "woman". Can you, please, cite the post where you did that? My apology regards being too lazy to search for it on my own.

 

I'm waiting for enlightenment.

 

I think I’ve been repeatedly very clear, and I’ve said DNA 2X chromosomes.

 

That's great, but it doesn't help me understand your argument if I can't read it. Simply stating it's got something to do with DNA 2X chromosomes isn't saying much.

 

This is a funny comment because when I want to understand somebody’s argument, I converse them and encourage them to explain their POV.

 

I've a
Supplied citations many times but they are always ignore it. Of course if you were familiar with trans medicine you would already know.

 

What do you think I've been doing? I don't like to assume what anyone means. If you'd rather waste our time by making observations about my intentions then I bid you goodbye on this matter.

 

If I ask someone for support regarding their statements you can rest assured that I will look at them. Being retired, I have the time.