Liz Cheney unveils new PAC

You said it... YOU PROVE IT with a source someone actually heard of. Do your own homework.

 

OK Dude, I'll do the legwork. I'm sure you'll dismiss it as irrelevant though, even though earlier, you said that this is extremely damaging.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/09/poli...g-on-donald-trumps-immunity-claims/index.html

“Could a president order SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival? That is an official act, an order to SEAL Team Six?” Pan asked.

“He would have to be, and would speedily be impeached and convicted before the criminal prosecution,” Sauer said.

“I asked you a yes or no question,” Pan said.

“If he were impeached and convicted first,” Sauer replied, later insisting that the “political process” of impeachment “would have to occur” before any prosecution could be initiated.

 

Hypotheticals really don't interest me much.

If Martians invaded Hoboken, could Seal Team Six be deployed to stop them?.... My answer would be something like... "Who cares?"

 

So @Media_Truth proves his point and you evade, ignore and deflect.

That's very typical of Trump supporters , coat to coast.

 

Talking about Seal Team six murdering people hardly proves anyone's point. It has never happened and never will. The military doesn't follow illegal orders. Thinking a legally elected official would order such illegal orders is absurd. It's all kind of silly.

 

Trump sent his people to storm the Capitol and stop congressional certification of the election and THAT was a scenario that anybody ever considered.
I'm positive Trump is capable of issuing an order like that to the US military.

 

Such a high bar to clear!

 

If you go back on this thread, I stated, "With immunity, Trump could murder Melania on National TV, and be immune to prosecution". Trump's attorneys would argue that he would have to be impeached before prosecution is possible.

 

Trump did nothing more than promote a PROTEST. And that is every American's right. It's in the Constitution. They occupied one building for a few hours... nothing more. That was a very common occurrence, by the way, back in the Viet Nam era. Protesters did it all the time.

 

Why do you want to see Melania killed?

 

You go with that. I'm sure all the insurrectionists in jail right now agree with you completely.
I'll wait for a verdict in Trump's trial.

 

That is why when they repat requests for 'proof", it is best to just ignore them. they dismiss what does not fit into their mindset off hand.

 

Particularly the die hard fanatics. Others might be having a rethink.......with some regret.

 

Trump has NOT been charged with "insurrection"

 

Translation: Things are looking really bad for Biden.

 

That's a lot of confidence considering your candidate is on a 6-year losing streak. You could sing it to the old Beatles tune - "Trump's a Loser, and he's not what he appears to be...Of all the loves he had once or had raped, there is one love he should never had crossed - E Jean Carroll, E Jean Carroll"

 

LOL. Cheney is considering options she wasn't considering a while ago because she see's Trump winning unless she does something.

 

Very good !!!

 

I actually agree with you. Yes, she is pursuing all options. After being on the January 6th committee, she is outraged. Is that surprising?

 

Thanks for admitting that it looks bad for Biden right now. But, it has nothing to do with Trump. Biden is losing because of Biden and the left's policies are making American's lives worse and the voters see that. Your strategy is to stop Trump from winning in order to continue with the policies that are hurting Americans. You are turning a blind eye to what Americans are going through due to Democratic policies.

 

Record stock market highs every day. The lowest unemployment in 50 years. Climate change incentives, while the other guy is a "denier". Infrastructure bill, which was a FAIL with the other guy. Chips and Science act keeping jobs in the US. Lower 4-year debt than the other guy despite inheriting massive interest on the massive OTHER-GUY DEBT every day. And relatively peaceful streets for 3+ years (remember the HATE under the other guy).

 

BTW, keeping this on-topic, Liz Cheaney would agree with every you said. Her policies, which are Conservative Republican, without the hate, illegal activities, and anti-Constitutional actions. Despite disagreeing with her policies, I respect her dearly, for calling a spade a spade.

 

People can't afford to live. You bury your head in the sand about that.

 

She has no chance and she knows she has no chance, which is why she didn't even enter the primaries. She would only enter into the race to be a spoiler for Trump, re-electing the very person whose policies she knows have destroyed America. That is the very definition of TDS, the complete and total obsession of getting one person, even if it means re-electing someone who is the anti-Liz Cheney. She got smoked in Wyoming and she would get smoked in every single state.

 

No doubt. She is not entering any race. She has formed a PAC to raise money to try to stop Trump from winning the presidency (ads, etc.). I just saw an interview (Sunday on Meet the Press) with another Republican Senator (Louisiana) who was one who voted to impeach Trump for 1/6, on principals, and he was asked if he would endorse Trump. He said no. He was asked if he would vote for Trump, and all he would say is that he would vote for a Republican. She asked if he would write-in a different candidate. He repeated that he would vote for a Republican. I think a lot of these disillusioned-from-Trump Republicans will be writing in Republican names.