School Reading List Includes Lesbian Sex, Gay Orgy

They denied it was in the book "Norwegian Wood", if you'll review (odd that you didn't get it the first time). However, given the way the right repeatedly posts about perverse sex acts, I'm not surprised that any ol' reason at all to get it on screen sufficed for your off-topic retort.

It seems that only you and Terrapinstation are interesting in fisting.... I find it additionally odd that you are derailing your own thread.
.

 

Yep and then, typical of Fox News story, it mentioned sophomores. FAIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I suspect as usual Fox just didn't get the facts right, since it got all turned on by a story about fisting.

 

There really is no need to "gay up" middle and high school kids, they are way more advanced than guys like me ten years older than them.

My grandpop told me that in the 1950s and 1960s nothing but subtle GLBT things appeared on televison. Now they have their own satelite network, Logo, and have characters on all the major networks.

Frankly, the more the religious right creates hoopla on the subject, the more television networks and movie studios look for GLBT scripts.

My wife and I feel that any young person over age 18 who has not tried both straight and GLBT intercourse should be in counseling. Sexual retardation can hurt anyone in adult life. How would you like to find out you are gay at age 40 when your best years are behind you? This can be easily prevented.

​

 

what sparks? what was that????
http://newyorkpost.com/p/news/local/reading_jersey_school_district_yanks_fYEg3v7dykZEf5AHk9NAfO


[quoteWILLIAMSTOWN, N.J. -- A New Jersey school district has apologized to parents after requiring high school students to read books that include graphic depictions of lesbian sex and a homosexual orgy, FOXNews.com reported Tuesday.
"Some of the language is inappropriate," said Chuck Earling, superintendent of Monroe Township Schools in Williamstown. "We were not trying to create controversy. We were just trying to get students to read."
The books were on a required summer reading list for middle school and high school students. The district decided to pull the book off the list, with the start of school just days away.


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/...t_yanks_fYEg3v7dykZEf5AHk9NAfO#ixzz1VuENspyB][/quote]

 

There is no way to defend or condone, or even attack or condemn, something that you guys simply don't know -- and that is pedophilia. You guys absolutely don't know what it is, and that is why none of you will offer a definition of it.

It would be like me asking you if you support or condone snigglegorkemdoodie. Well, do you?

Now you could look up the proper medical definition of pedophila, but I suspect you've (collectively speaking) been pwned on it before, so it's the old 'pretend' tactic of using something you know is a falsehood but it has good shock value, so intellectual honesty is tossed aside. Which really seems stupid since anyone with any intelligence will know it's a clueless argument.

But in any case, pedophilia is not involved in books being discussed in this thread. Which makes it real odd that the right keeps obsessively talking about it (along with all the other weird sex that they've been talking about in this thread).
.

 

we know, we know.

you're a michael jackson fan, and all of this talk has offended you.

 

Are you claiming Sparks is a pedophile?

I think that's reportable. We'll find out if it is, I guess.

 

Give me a list of books and I'll double check.

 

bwhahahaha how do you come to that conclusion?.

funny stuff.

 

how do you know that the parents who complained are right wing?

 

ROFReallyLMAOff -- that's just a reprint of the Fox story. Man, I wouldn't believe such fail if I had not seen it with my own eyes

The NY Post (a Rupert Murdoch company) story links to a Fox News (a Rupert Murdoch company) story which links to the original Fox Radio (a Rupert Murdoch company) Blog story, which you quoted and linked to in your OP. So, your argument is that we should believe the same story repeated three times by the same company.

Well, my argument is that we believe the original story posted by the local newspaper, featuring quotes like: "for one local school it has caused more controversy this year as arguments about content and age-appropriateness have ensued. [...] Williamstown High School [...]", with no mention of any middle school, in addition to those local quotes I posted earlier proving that the books were intended for 10th and 12th graders -- not pre-teens, ladies and gents, like the OP would have you falsely believe.

Again, you can read the unedited (i.e., non-Fox) story right here, folks: http://www.nj.com/gloucester-county/index.ssf/2011/08/monroe_twp_parents_angry_over.html

For you Fox fans, just stay on the clueless train; Rupert would be lost without ya

This is what the right wing calls independent verification, folks -- three different Fox outlets printing the exact same story

 

hey Sparks.

When are you going to answer my question?

 

So its your story against mine....hmmmm sure that fox news didn't reprint the story I just posted? NJ.com is a far left leaning site....its part of the star ledger network....learn something lib.

 

It's a reasonable conclusion based upon the history of banned books.

It's also a reasonable conclusion considering the right wing are almost invariably the ones uptight about sex and 'dirty' words.

But I will toss you one bone... the ACLU are the ones that tried to get Huckleberry Finn banned (N-word). Offhand I don't think the left is going to be the ones uptight in this case (homosexuality)... do you?

 

you won't get an answer.

 

I have yet to see you come to a reasonable conclusion just leftwing buffoonerry.

PS can I use the word (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) or (*)(*)(*)? who is uptight about those words?

 

Since no one commented on this post I would just like to thank you for the well thought out points and your review of the book. Unfortunately actually reading the book or attempting to understand the context is too much work for those who spend a large part of their life looking for anyway possible to demonize the other side.

 

Wrong again.... but consistent . . . . I'm done... this thread is so destroyed that any more pwning at this point would be considered

 

see, you ask a question, you get some random off the top bs story. abotu some gay crap.

 

and then slinks away with tail between legs

 

It's hilarious to see the Tea Partiers have an organism over a Faux News report that can't even avoid getting confused about what grade these kids were.

And then all the stuff about gerbils and fisting -- somebody thinks about this stuff much too much.

 

im trying to pick something that is universally detested (slavery, pedophilia) to make the point not every reference to something negative is glorifying it or harmful.

 

Gerbils are funny. Fisting gerbils? Now that is just cruel.

 

its been banned from the summer reading list

 

not sure, how did so many righties know the book should haev been banned when they hadnt read it>?