"One World Order" is way too nice to describe what the war mongers are doing: dividing USSR, dividing middle east, us between liberals, neocons, islamofaschists, christians, etc. etc. division, division division. To me, a more accurate description would be divided world disorder, but because the BS is spread with an intent to further and not destroy their cause, it is known as "one world order" One World - unity, good thing (Lenon, Freddy Mercury would agree. and I don't believe Lenon was shot by just a crazed fan) Order - good thing. with things in order governments do not go into debts.
I don't agree with your world view, but by definition people who want war are dividers. It's impossible to conquer and hold the entire earth through force. Aggression can be assumed to be met by more aggression. That's why fascists mongered war so much; because it kept the nation unified against other nations. But it's unusual for a war to occur purely for the purpose of division. Usually division is a consequence and cause of war, not a goal (except for with certain super-nationalistic governments in history). The point of world unification, on the other hand, is to end war. So obviously a warmonger can't be too supportive of that.
First of all, I appreciate your vote for the right choice. my perception of you improved, I was under assumption that you are completely pro war monger. Also agree with everything you said here, and nowhere did I said anything that contradicts with what you just said.
