“The UK is Never Going to be White Again”

"A bunch of people"... lol. We're talking about the Jews here, who are the most powerful people in the world, as they own the banks and a LOT of corporations/businesses.

If the Jews declare a boycott on a Nation, then it will be set-up for destruction.

 

Have a read:

The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany

The Economic Boycott of 1933

---> http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html

 

Stop whining that people chose to exercise their right to buy and sell to who they wanted. No matter how powerful they are, it is not a declaration of war.

- - - Updated - - -

Please show me a copy of this formal declaration of war, there never was one. Read your own article.

 

To understand Hitler's reaction to the Jewish declaration of war, it is vital to understand the critical state of the German economy at the time. In 1933, the German economy was in a shambles. Some 3 million Germans were on public assistance with a total of 6 million unemployed. Hyper-inflation had destroyed the economic vitality of the German nation. Furthermore, the anti-German propaganda pouring out of the global press strengthened the resolve of Germany's enemies, especially the Poles and their hawkish military high command.

The Jewish leaders were not bluffing. The boycott was an act of war not solely in metaphor: it was a means, well crafted, to destroy Germany as a political, social and economic entity. The long term purpose of the Jewish boycott against Germany was to bankrupt her with respect to the reparation payments imposed on Germany after World War I and to keep Germany demilitarized and vulnerable.

The boycott, in fact, was quite crippling to Germany. Jewish scholars such as Edwin Black have reported that, in response to the boycott, German exports were cut by 10 percent, and that many were demanding seizing German assets in foreign countries (Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement - The Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine, New York, 1984).

The attacks on Germany did not cease. The worldwide Jewish leadership became ever the more belligerent and worked itself into a frenzy. An International Jewish Boycott Conference was held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing boycott campaign. It was held under the auspices of the self-styled World Jewish Economic Federation, of which famous New York City attorney and longtime political power broker, Samuel Untermyer, was elected president.

Upon returning to the United States in the wake of the conference, Untermyer delivered a speech over WABC Radio (New York), a transcript of which was printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933.

Untermyer's inflammatory oratory called for a "sacred war" against Germany, making the flat-out allegation that Germany was engaged in a plan to "exterminate the Jews." He said (in part):

http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html

 

Do you understand what constitutes a Declaration of War?
Will you provide the Formal Declaration of War the article you posted lied about?
Will you explain how the German Jews who objected to the boycott in any way declared war?
If as you stated the Zionist Jews of Germany were not part of the alleged declaration, then how can you claim The Jews and not Some Jews?

 

O yes, of course a lot of German Jews, who didn't want to have nothing to do with it, were also affected by it. Nontheless, war was declared by Judea after holding a big conference in Amsterdam where the leaders of World Jewry came about. Not a war to be fought with standing armies, but through economics.

Almost a decade later the same happened to the Japanese in the US when war was declared. Japanese who always lived in harmony in the US were also suddenly seen as the enemy. And a lot of them got rounded up and put in concentration camps to be deported...





... just like what happened to the Jews.

 

except the Japanese were not mass-murdered by the Americans.

most who went into the camps, survived the camps.

unlike the Jews

 

Would you be so kind as to show me a map of Judea in 1933, which country declared a war. Now stop it and admit that "Some Jews declared an Economic Boycott of Germany".

Facts are facts, economic boycotts are not declarations of war.

 

it was also a non-binding boycott.

no one faced any legal ramifications for buying German goods

 

It was actually much more than what you are making it out to be and Germany definitely took it as an act of war which is EXACTLY what the wealthy, powerful Jews of the time intended.

 

The Jews also weren't mass-murdered. There is not 1 single piece of "Nazi" paper which proves it, neither is there any forensic evidence for it.

And the photo's which dead people in the camps which you get to see are because of tyhpus and starvation, as the Germans infrastructure was bombed to bit and they couldn't supply the camps with medicine and food anymore.

- - - Updated - - -

The Jews didn't have their own country back then yet. But what they did have is the banks under their control and a lot of corporations/businesses.

 

No, it was exactly what I said, A Economic Boycott of Germany by SOME Jews. Show how that is not the correct description.

 

Banks and Corporations do not declare war. Now please show the Formal Document as lied about in the article you posted.

 

"Some Jews" is deceptive as we are talking about the wealthiest and most powerful men of the time.

Few people know the facts about the singular event that helped spark what ultimately became known as World War II - the international Jewish declaration of war on Germany shortly after Adolf Hitler came to power and well before any official German government sanctions or reprisals against Jews were carried out. The March 24, 1933 issue of The Daily Express of London (shown above) described how Jewish leaders, in combination with powerful international Jewish financial interests, had launched a boycott of Germany for the express purpose of crippling her already precarious economy in the hope of bringing down the new Hitler regime. It was only then that Germany struck back in response. Thus, if truth be told, it was the worldwide Jewish leadership - not the Third Reich - that effectively fired the first shot in the Second World War. Prominent New York attorney Samuel Untermyer (above right) was one of the leading agitators in the war against Germany, describing the Jewish campaign as nothing less than a "holy war."


More here: http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html

 

You completely destroy your argument when you persist in this kind of rubbish. It is clear to anyone that a economic boycott is not a declaration of war, no matter how powerful the boycotters are.

Maybe there is some merit in the idea that some Jews manufactured WW2 but even if there was, it is never seriously discussed because you continue to lie that the Jews declared war. Why not except that and tell us who the richest and most powerful men in the world started WW2. Who were they? What corporations did they own? What were their aims?

 

So, that might explain why the English, and Welsh are more Mediterranean by DNA, than are the Scots, and Irish.\

 

You lack the understanding of the economics of time to grasp what is really pretty obvious.

Read the link I posted. It is not that long and I lied about nothing. After that, if you are still having problems understanding the underlying point, I will try to explain it in a simpler way for you.

 

More like light people are people who survived the Ice Age, and the Ice Age killed off the stupid people, and put more pressure on intelligence to survive by being able to not only be more aware of the surroundings in a harsh environment, but also to sew better clothing, build better fires, build better shelter etc.

 

Sure, it does Poland is 99.8% White, and most of those 0.2% are Chinese, Vietnamese, and Chechens.

The U.S.A was close to 87% White in the 1960's, now barely over 60% of the U.S.A is White, and less than 50% of babies are born White in the U.S.A.

 

Lolz, aren't Germans pushing Muslim refugee quotas down the EU's throat?

 

If race is a construct, how come forensics / anthropologists can find out ones race by a skeletal remains, how come a geneticist can find out ones race, and ethnicity by a DNA sample, and how come 2 purely Chinese people will never have babies who look Black African, or White European?

Hmm, I think anti-racism is a construct, no?

 

Or a hair. The difference between a Kenyan and an Irishman are social, BWAHAHAHA!!!

 

Its called common genetic expression amongst various habitats. I get that racial identity is important to some, but it isn't to me. I be human, man.

Of course anti-racism is a construct but it wouldn't exist but for racism to begin with. Anti-racism can be quite aggressive but its no where near as murderous and cruel as racism.

 

Erasing unique, and diverse heritages of peoples from the Earth is just wrong, whether by anti-racism, or racism.

Oh please, the prime motivations of colonialism was greed, rather than racism.

Do you really think that colonialism was about racism?

Gee whiz.

No, they saw colonialism as a way to profit off of looted plunder, and chattel slavery profits.

In both cases the elite has pushed for racism, and now anti-racism with little regard for peoples heritages, so long as they make profits.

 

I agree that harsher environments oftimes demand a number of higher level skills and infrastructure in order to prosper. And it goes without saying that the European side of the Med created great wealth on its way to becoming the cross roads of the world in trade and knowledge. Such wealth supported a large population of highly skilled craftsmen that created even more wealth. I also agree that during the ice age, any high melanin skin tone would be a major caloric and nutrition disadvantage over "white" skinned people.

I can never figure out what "white" actually means. Near as I can figure out it means different things to different people. At what point is a person genetically white? If a grandfather was black, is the girl still white? Is that dusky, sloe-eyed smoking hot italian babe white even if she's more smoky carmel than white by a long shot? As far as I am concerned racism is a stupid artifact of historic behaviours and attitudes. I know its very real, but I still think its stupid.