‘Who will clean toilets?’ Salon writer accidentally admits the Left’s RACIST views on illegals

60 votes... Simple.. Has been explained to you multiple times!

 

While demanding a "living wage" and ranting about the evils of "corporations"

 

SO, you want americans picking fruit. Are YOU willing to pay for the insurance, that they will use, when they are stooped and ruined? So you delude yourself into thinking that they will pay decent wages, and provide insurance? I guarantee they will offer piecework, and no benefits.

 

My response was in direct reply to a far right post. Then you guys tried to deny it, but couldn't.

 

illegal immigrants are not Americans.

 

Yes, prices would go up and CEOs would begin making less. This is a good thing.
They will also start paying Americans a working wage.

It's supply and demand.

 

Excellent post.

 

Wait i thought the Illegals were "Americans" as well.. Cant keep up with the talking points can you?

 

So in your mind it's OK to hire Mexicans and let them get stooped and ruined while going underpaid and without insurance.

 

So? All the party in power has to do is get a measly 9 other votes. 2 of them are independents. So, all they need is 7 D votes.
Ever hear of compromise? Ever hear of governing?
Stop blaming the party that has no power. Simple

 

You sound like an advocate for slavery...

SHOCKING!!!

 

Spare me ... it is no secret that a large percentage of folks who clean toilets are illegal immigrants Stating a fact is hardly racist .. despite how often the left tries to make this claim.

 

Those two "independents" vote the D party line the vast majority of the time.... Compromise with the likes of Pelosi or Schumer?? Right...

Compromise involves two or more willing parties... Pelosi and Schumer had no interest in compromise.

 

Pay under the table and skirt all the laws they pass on the citizens.

 

why does the right have to lie, on one hand they say the left wants everyone to be paid $15 an hour, then this, which is it?

why is the right against a increase in the min wage? why does the right want to get rid of the min wage altogether?

the right wants to take away all the workers benefits and pay them $2 an hour to compete with china, corps are the rights top priority

the right actually wants us to think corps are people too, so they can say they work for the people

 

I've seen it over and over again on this forum. Someone on the left makes the identical argument for illegal labor that a southern senator could have made on the senate floor in the 1850's in defense of slavery. .“Ahh say suh…(yes I’m imagining him as Foghorn Leghorn) the institution of slavery is needed to provide cheap and plentiful food and clothing for all, as well as mammies to raise ouah babies so we can pursue self actualizing careers…”

 

No, no - the progressive left wants workers on the books to make $15. Even then, it's mostly to boost their own egos. They want migrants to pick their grapes and pick their cotton - oops, we took away their slaves.

 

It seemed like Chuck and Nancy, as trump calls em, did have a deal. He backed out.

 

Link to the parameters of this "deal".

 

totally. Well put. Foghorn is perfect. In his day Obama would of poured his coffee.

 

I don't think so.

 

It is self evident: those who need illegals to clean toilets and nanny children (notice how they draw an equivalency) are those who fight for open borders.

It sure isn't Republicans!

 

They exploit people for slave wages

 

It's not punishment---it's called character building. Best thing for them.

 

You are not aware of the Chuck and Nancy deal.

Trump’s deal with Chuck and Nancy didn’t throw Republicans under the bus.
Republican leaders are furious that Trump struck a deal with Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, “rolling over” his congressional frenemies Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan. The agreement for a three-month government funding bill should avert a government shutdown and avoid a debt default—it also gives Democrats even more leverage the next time negotiations come up...

So pleased was the president with press reaction to his bipartisanship that he called his new best friends, Chuck and Nancy, to share his joy. And had them to dinner last Wednesday, during which they agreed to a deal to legalize the status of the “DREAMers.” Or at least that’s what Schumer and Pelosi said.

...Not so fast, said the president on Thursday morning: “If there’s not a wall, we’re doing nothing [on DACA].” Democrats must agree “not to obstruct the wall . . .” when votes on its funding come up. Trump’s concern: Kindness to the DREAMers now can encourage a new wave of young people to pour across our border later in the hope of similar leniency. Trump’s core voters and perhaps the exiled Steve Bannon must have gotten to him while he was watching Fox News after dinner. And Schumer’s core probably got to him. His morning-after comments included him saying, “We made clear we’d continue to oppose it [the wall] . . . a medieval solution for a modern problem. A Game of Thrones idea for a world that is a lot closer to Star Wars.” Not much room for a middle ground between guest and host...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/donald-and-chuck-and-nancy/article/2009703