“Extraordinary & Worrisome” – WSJ Demands To Know How FBI ‘Meddled’ In 2016 Elections

“Extraordinary & Worrisome” – WSJ Demands To Know How FBI ‘Meddled’ In 2016 Elections ​

By Curt
Sept. 20th, 2017

Tyler Durden:
ia The Wall Street Journal’s Editorial Board,
Congress needs to learn how the FBI meddled in the 2016 campaign.
When Donald Trump claimed in March that he’d had his “wires tapped” prior to the election, the press and Obama officials dismissed the accusation as a fantasy. We were among the skeptics, but with former director James Comey’s politicized FBI the story is getting more complicated.
CNN reported Monday that the FBI obtained a warrant last year to eavesdrop on Paul Manafort, Mr. Trump’s campaign manager from May to August in 2016. The story claims the FBI first wiretapped Mr. Manafort in 2014 while investigating his work as a lobbyist for Ukraine’s ruling party. That warrant lapsed, but the FBI convinced the court that administers the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to issue a second order as part of its probe into Russian meddling in the election.
Finding a financial advisor who you could trust used to be difficult, but not anymore. SmartAsset’s Financial Advisor Matching tool will find the best advisor for you, based on your financial profile. Learn more about how easy it is – here.
Guess who has lived in a condo in Trump Tower since 2006? Paul Manafort.
The story suggests the monitoring started in the summer or fall, and extended into early this year.
While Mr. Manafort resigned from the campaign in August, he continued to speak with Candidate Trump.
It is thus highly likely that the FBI was listening to the political and election-related conversations of a leading contender for the White House.
That’s extraordinary – and worrisome.

Mr. Comey told Congress in late March that he “had no information that supports those [Trump] tweets.”
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was even more specific that “there was no such wiretap activity mounted against—the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.”
He denied that any such FISA order existed.​

Were they lying?

Source: http://www.floppingaces.net/most-wa...ds-to-know-how-fbi-meddled-in-2016-elections/

______

Please be prepared and don't be surprised to hear or read about untimely deaths by thieves on the street, suicide, or the overdosing of opioids of people like DWS, the Awan brothers, Powers, or anyone connected to the DNC, or the White House wiretapping of Trump or his key campaign advisors.
The Madness of Investigations is spilling over into focuses other than Trump/Russia.
Drag a hook through a swamp and lots of bad stuff thought lost when cast overboard becomes retrieved from long ago.
If the surveillance of Trump's associates by the White House was not political in nature why were the names leaked? Why were the conversations with foreign leaders leaked? Why all the leaks? Why were these reports shared between sixteen other agencies? Who ordered the surveillance and when? We are now learning that surveillance, at least in Manaford's case, started much earlier than that of others and, as it relates to Susan Rice's unmasking, it had no direct Russia collusion angle no matter how it is made to appear that a meeting with an UAE crown prince was tainted with a possible drop of Russian dressing, nonetheless does not make it Russian collusion and most certainly had no intelligence value thereof.

 

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

It was Russia I tells ya!

 

OK.

With this epic revelation I am sure the entire U.S. government will collapse before sunrise.

Paging Bigfoot and Bat Boy.

 

Yeti = Russian operative.

Trump MUST be impeached!

 

deleted

 

______

Trolling again Andy?