“Lone Hacker” Guccifer 2.0 Goofs, Accidentally Reveals Himself to Be a Russian Intelligence Officer

Still not seeing any citations professor ... you switched over to ad hominems quite a ways back. Do you have anthing else?

 

If their strength of faith were put towards being Christian as they claim to be they'd be pretty good Christians. Alas they've misplaced their faith.

 

If their strength of faith were put towards being Christian as they claim to be they'd be pretty good Christians. Alas they've misplaced their faith.

 

Facts are not ad homs. You fallaciously alleged that phishing was not hacking and you were schooled on your abysmal lack of knowledge in that regard.

 

You've only repeated, a half dozen times, that I "lack knowledge". You've provided no citation that supports that ad hom. Not one of my assertions have you rebutted through citation. "Phishing" is not hacking. A phony email is sent. It is inert unless the recipient is an idiot, as in the case of Podesta. A simple template, available online to any 4th grader, was sent to Podesta. That's not a hack it's spam that can be disasterous for fools like Podesta.

 

You were provided with an explanation that any layperson could understand that the OBJECTIVE of hacking is to obtain data that would otherwise be secured and unavailable. Phishing is just one form of hacking that relies upon gullibility and ignorance in order to obtain the data.

Since you are insistently whining about needing a citation here are a couple.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/definition/hacking

https://www.techopedia.com/definition/26361/hacking

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/phishing

Note that the Spoofing hacking method describes how Phishing actually works.

 

Now who's playing at semantics? OK Podesta was victimized by a 4th grade "hacker" then?

 

Thank you for establishing that your comprehension of hacking is at a "4th grade" level.

Do you have any idea what it takes to set up a spoofing web site? Of course you don't. A good one can make you believe that you just mistyped your password and it disappears before you even know that it was even there grabbing your login and password details.

 

I have every idea. Services are readily available ... www. Bit.ly .com for example. My comprehension doesn't need to be above 4th grade to recognize "Phishing" spam. There's no evidence of any level of sophistication beyond a 4th grade level behind Podestas email "Phishing". Save Podestas lack there of.

 

Agree. Now where is that DNC server and Seth Rich's laptop?

 

Particularly since we now know Podesta's password was................drumroll....................password.

 

Your posts prove the opposite.

 

"I deride you" has been trying to spin this garbage for days. Nothing indicates that there was any sophistication in the "Phishing".

 

Yeah ... your only citation has been an online dictionary.

 

It's pretty obvious that a 4th grader could crack Podesta's "secure" network by simply guessing a simpleton's password. The entire campaign staff likely had access to sensitive information. That's why Seth Rich's murder by friendly fire is not only plausible, but probable. He was made an example for the rest of the staff and the DC Police Department was complicit in the coverup.

 

Your failure to honestly acknowledge ALL of my links says volumes.

 

Wikipedia? Really?

 

All of the links defining the term "hack"? Yes, they're all brilliant.

 

Is bank robbery not bank robbery if the robber can claim that the combination was too easy?

 

Is it bank robbery if the robber is an employee of the bank? I think Seth Rich "embezzled" Sgt Shultz and Podesta's darkest secrets.

 

They didn’t need to inspect them, they already knew who did it.

 

It is and RIch wasn't

 

Ironic!! The only thing you've ever proven on PF is........ (redacted for PF forum rules) , even though they are true)

 

Volunteer and "employee" are one in the same. They both sign non disclosure agreements but violators usually don't get the death penalty.

 

That's you on the trailing end, in case you were confused.