“Pro-Trump lawmakers form caucus promoting Anglo-Saxon political traditions”

Is that what you think? It's not culture, no father, gang ties, no education, or anything like that, it's melanin. Where do you come up with this stuff?

 

Facts often end debate.

According to research from Princeton University, students who identify as Asian must score, on average, 140 points higher on the SAT (out of 1600) than whites to have the same chance of admission to private colleges. They must score 450 points higher on the SAT than African-Americans.

https://thespikelab.com/the-asian-tax-in-college-admissions/#:~:text=The%20%E2%80%9CAsian%20Tax%E2%80%9D%20In%20College%20Admissions%20-%20The,450%20points%20higher%20on%20the%20SAT%20than%20African-Americans.

 

Communists in America and it's education system is not facts. And yes, one who uses communism as a debate point is an end of a debate.

 

No, it's not what I think.

 

No, the argument is that if we were isolated populations long enough that those physical characteristics (which are far more immutable than mental ones) evolved differently between the races then it only stands to reason that mental faculties and our brains would have done the same.

Without going into a long diatribe here, the physical characteristic differences we see between the races mostly derived from the difference in environment and lifestyle. So too did the mental differences. Caucasoids and mongoloids invented and became proficient in agriculture for thousands of years prior to the negroid populations instituting it. Whereas the caucasoids and mongoloids were building massive cities and civilizations predicated upon agriculture, the negroid populations were still living as Hunter gatherers.

Again, for brevity, what are the differences in the type of people who succeed in an agriculture society when compared to a Hunter gatherer society? Well the Hunter gatherers must continuously strive and fight for their food. They have to defend not only their food but their tribe from predators. Whereas the agricultural communities usually have fences and grow their food.

This inevitably means that those who succeed, and as a byproduct reproduce, within the Hunter gatherer society are those who are athletic, strong, fast and very aggressive. You need high physical prowess, not as high intellect and the ability to become hyper-aggressive enough on a consistent basis to be able to defend what’s yours. This is not true in an agricultural society however where we would expect more intellectual attributes to be desirable and successful and therefore to be able to breed and pass along their genetic material.

The divergence in our evolutionary paths explains the average higher intellect, lesser athleticism and lower aggression rates of the caucasoid and mongoloid populations compared to the lower intellect, superior athleticism and the higher aggression rates within the negroid populations.

 

And just for the record I don’t think any one race is superior to the other. Are some races superior in certain ways? Of course. On average blacks are far more athletic than Asians. That doesn’t make one better than the other just different. On average Asians have a higher intelligence than whites. That doesn’t make them better, just different.

We should celebrate those differences, not pretend as if they don’t exist.