️Election Interference 2024 edition️

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by trumptman, Jul 10, 2023.

  1. trumptman

    trumptman Newly Registered

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2021
    Messages:
    761
    Likes Received:
    657
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm so old I can remember the good old days when all this was just blamed on Trump and so of course all bets, gloves were off since he was "such a threat" to Democracy with his Russian interference.

    Well it's 2024 and at this stage the threat has become ABB, anyone but Biden.

    On top of Trump being indicted, harassed as the current top Republican candidate for President for 2024 we have the following...

    https://twitter.com/shellenberger/status/1678530417312387073?s=20

    YouTube is censoring Robert Kennedy Jr. on speech has engaged in declaring it is misinformation and so they've removed it. It doesn't matter if COVID actions, vaccines and so on are a major 2024 election issue, YouTube must continue to enforce the Biden demands. Robert Kennedy Jr is an active candidate for the Democratic Party ticket in 2024 and on election issues on which YouTube declares that he disagrees with our government position, he is censored.

    https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1678528304616226816?s=20

    The DOJ has announced charges against missing Biden corruption case witness Gal Luft after he reappeared to detail allegations against the Biden Family.

    https://nypost.com/2023/07/05/missi...nst-presidents-family-in-extraordinary-video/

    The claim is he has been arrested to avoid his testimony from occurring in the House.

    Remember they can do all of this but they can't find out who dropped that cocaine in the White House.

    What's the line for those of you that can't see the facts yet? When they arrest Cornell West for lying about his race on federal forms (because if you don't vote for Biden, you ain't black) will some of you believe then? What's the line if not this one for you to give a ****?

    https://www.cnn.com/2023/07/04/tech...ies-communication-covid-censorship/index.html

    Don't forget that the Biden administration has all had an injunction just placed against them telling them to stop contacting social media companies and telling them to censor the speech of Americans.

    How much longer can any of this be defended? At some point the coincidences and claims about everyone but Biden just can't add up.
     
    Joe knows likes this.
  2. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,455
    Likes Received:
    31,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your standard for "election interference" is that no one who is running (on your side) or who is politically convenient for you should be indicted for anything ever no matter what crimes they've committed.
     
    Nemesis likes this.
  3. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,455
    Likes Received:
    31,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Also, the injunction you are talking about was based on actions taken during the TRUMP administration. Not the Biden administration. And it will likely be overturned because there is no evidence that even Trump's corrupt regime was "telling" social media to censor anything.
     
  4. Joe knows

    Joe knows Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2021
    Messages:
    13,672
    Likes Received:
    10,052
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There was much more in his post than that and I believe he’s on par
     
  5. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,455
    Likes Received:
    31,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There was more, but my statement about his standard covers the whole OP. It's just more "rules for thee but not for me" nonsense. If by "on par" you mean blind hypocrisy, then sure, I agree.

    I guess I could also add the elementary observation that private platforms enforcing their own terms of service isn't a violation of anyone's rights and it is dumber than a sack of hammers to call it "election interference."
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2023
  6. Joe knows

    Joe knows Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2021
    Messages:
    13,672
    Likes Received:
    10,052
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It is election interference if the government is found to be pressuring it in any way. That was found to be true during COVID and during the hunter laptop info of last election cycle.
     
  7. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,455
    Likes Received:
    31,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is no evidence of said government "pressuring." And the only "examples" you guys come up with are from the Trump administration.
     
    Nemesis likes this.
  8. Joe knows

    Joe knows Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2021
    Messages:
    13,672
    Likes Received:
    10,052
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I just gave one of the government pressuring during the hunter laptop story as well. The FBI claimed it to be false although they had the laptop in hand lmao. Calling it Russian propaganda lol. And you’re here defending it. That came out in the twitter release. Easily searchable.

    doesn’t matter if Trumps team was part of it, it shouldn't have happened then either. Most of that was that corrupt trash Fauci in my opinion but yes it was during trump.
     
  9. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,455
    Likes Received:
    31,522
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What pressure? You gave no actual example of pressure. And why did the Trump administration do that?

    Source?

    THEY NEVER CALLED THE EXISTENCE OF THE LAPTOP RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA. They said Russians were spreading propaganda ABOUT the laptop. Which, no, isn't pressure.

    Yes. And unlike you guys, I ACTUALLY looked into it instead of just blindly copy/pasting what I was told.

    I'm sorry medical facts offend you, but sharing them isn't "pressuring" anyone. I know you prefer the braindead conspiracy theories about Fauci to the medical facts about COVID, but you aren't making your case for how it is "pressure."
     
    Patricio Da Silva likes this.

Share This Page