2 months before 9/11 Tenet tricked Condi into a meeting to WARN her...

You're still not making any sense and your attempt at a hypothetical analogy only makes things more confusing. Who is Malik? Is that Osama Bin Laden? Who were these "people" we were supposed to hire? What do you mean by "buy guns" and the rest? It sounds like your talking about the Patriot act. Are you saying that we should have created the dept. of homeland security, passed the patriot act, made the terrorist watch lists, or even attack Afghanistan before the hijackings? If so how would that have stopped the cell that was already trained and already in the U.S. at the time the warning mentioned in the OP was issued?

The CT theories are so confused it's comical at times. 1/3 of them pretend to be mad because the administration should have gone all Rambo on the Middle East before the attacks. 1/3 of them are mad because the administration went all Rambo on the Middle East after the attacks, and a 1/3 of them are perfectly content to argue both positions when it suits them.

The result is a tangled spiderweb of CT conjecture. In order for this whole thing to be "part of the plan" the admin must have warned itself so that it could ignore the warnings so that they could do the things they should have done if they had listened to the warnings and the fact that we found out 13 years later is proof that they didn't want us to know about the ignored self warning.... Nuts.

 

Can you name a commercial airliner sized aircraft that does NOT have a transponder, ( hint, check your friendly local community airport and ask how many of the single engine puddle jumpers have transponders )...
Also, do you really and truly believe that our military doesn't monitor the area on the eastern seaboard that includes our Capital?

 

Yes,I do...civilian radars cover more area.

 

No, I made perfect sense, but we're going to spend the next few posts arguing about that very fact. Nevertheless, the analogy I used was on a small scale, which was easy to decipher and follow. If you don't like that example, replace the unnamed man/husband/father with yourself: you're aware of some guy that desires to hurt you and your family. Would you sit on your hands and do nothing or do something about it I.e. get a gun or buy dogs etc. The President of the United States has those resources on speed dial, the ones I mentioned: surveillance, spying, men with guns, etc. The Commander in Chief did not do his job, even though he was repeatedly warned and made aware of the threat facing the United States, our interests and our allies. Pre-9/11 events is the undoing of the narrative that government higher ups and spokespeople routinely cite, "We didn't know!" Which is obviously bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

 

Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, as well other radicalized and extremist Muslims had already attacked the United States several times, both at home and abroad. The War on Terrorism has largely been against Muslims. After the Soviet Union collapsed, and the Cold War ended, the budget hawks in Congress started eyeballing the amount of taxpayer money that the security services were getting. It was said that without the Soviet Union that budgets should be considerably reduced. And people may wish to deny that the military-industrial complex does not exist, but it does: two extremely famous U.S. General Officers have commented on the way War has gripped America: President Eisenhower and Major General Smedley Butler (USMC). An enemy was found and put on center stage: disenfranchised Muslims who had been radicalized in several conflicts, but particularly in Afghanistan in the War against the Soviet Union. Much of that radicalization and ideology was taught to Muslim men out of textbooks paid for by the U.S. Government. Gaddafi had attacked the U.S. and the West in the 80's, and the attacks in Lebanon in the early eighties as well the hostages taken there and Iran too. President Reagan declared War on Terrorism, as did President Clinton. Terrorism was the new catchall, which is made apparent by how the IC monitored and analyzed notable terrorists, like OBL, a long time before the general public is made aware of the man, like OBL was being watched in Sudan in the early '90's by men like Billy Waugh.

 

apparently, by your sig line, you KNOW that there are certain criminal factions holding high positions of if not authority, at least serious respect of those who have authority.
and with that, there is as a given, HUGE conflict of interest indicated in having the GOV. commission a study of what happened on 9/11/2001. The whole "9/11 report" fiasco is nothing but a white-wash job!
Note also that there is the FACT that the '93 bombing was actually a product of what was supposed to be an FBI sting operation, but the bomb was detonated and it is a fact that the FBI supplied the explosives. How can we believe our "leaders" when crap like this goes on?

 

Nonsense.. The US government didn't orchestrate 9-11.. Tenet was concerned about the uptick in chatter.

 

My official position on this is that I do not know WHO did it, but its apparent by the facts of the case, that it was NOT done with hijacked airliners, therefore the mainstream media account of the events is a LIE, lets start from there.

 

You have ignored the facts of the event and glommed on to every imaginable conspiracy theory.. The best one was about Holograms.. LOLOLOL

 

exactly when did I state anything about "holograms"?
and having adherence to "every imaginable" conspiracy theory, is simply NOT true, I know what I know, in that the alleged airliner crashes into the WTC towers were NOT commercial airliners and that is a given. Also the "collapse" events of WTC1,2 & 7 were clearly controlled demolition, you can speculate about the events all you want, but the facts speak for themselves.

 

Interesting how Secretary Rice was given a warning two months before 9-11 happened.