That's now many more votes President Obama got than Romney. HRC will beat trump by more. This will not resemble the 2000 election in any shape or form. 500 votes in one state... hanging chads... supreme court intervention... The losing party in the current election is already in excuse making mode. " but-but-but- ... what about 2000 -- but-but-but- ... what about the media -- etc.etc.etc. whine whine whine "
Unless you agree with it. Then it's great. Kind of like "I will accept the results of the election... as long as I win"
Uhmmmm, no. 4.98 million. http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/compare.php?type=national&year=2012&f=1&off=0&elect=0
Very true. The OP's figures are in error. I have nothing against anti-Trump threads (in general), but if somebody wants to constantly spam the forum with anti-Trump OPs--I don't think it is too much to ask of them to (at least) get their facts straight.
I was using the numbers from wikipedia. In any case, between 4 and 5 million. This time will be by more. trump says "it's a movement." Maybe a bowel movement.
Dave Leip's USELECTIONATLAS is the definitive repository of END-statistics for elections. Many forget that following a major election, it may take up to 8 weeks for the final canvasses to be signed and sealed by the respective SOSes and then it goes into the official congressional record. And even then, changes can happen up to one year later. It happened in Alabama or Mississippi from the 2004 GE.
Assuming 137 million votes cast and just an 8% margin, that would be: almost 11 million votes in raw vote margin.
Is that figuring in any votes for stoner and Steiner? Or McMullin? If Clinton wins Ohio look for a final tally of: Clinton 347 trump 184 McMullin 6 If trump carries Ohio (which I doubt will happen) Clinton 329 trump 202 McMullin 6 Yes, I am predicting a McMullin win in his home state of Utah.
