7-Year Old Trump Supporter Gets Call From White House After Being Attacked At DNC

Trump only spouts fake news, says a member of the party of hoax hate crimes.

Okay.

 

Police make SECOND arrest in attack on 7 year-old.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...r-old-trump-supporter-outside-dnc-convention/

"21-year-old Camryn Amy was arrested Saturday, just one day after Olivia Winslow was arrested and charged for the same attack against a 7-year-old boy...
Amy was accused of punching a third victim, a man, in the face, resulting in a small laceration to his lip which caused him “substantial pain” the victim told police in court records. Amy then allegedly threw the MAGA hat over a fence and struck the adult woman in the face with a closed fist, which did not result in injury, court records said."

Video of a lot of the confrontation is in the article.

Clearly the two women are simply degenerate humans and belong in jail.

 

I am pretty sure that two people wouldn't set themselves up to face three felony counts just to push a false claim. Your willingness to condone violence against children for the cause of fascism disguised as anti fascism is noted.

 

Your statement makes me pretty sure that you don't know WTF "entrapment" means.

 

Setting up outside the DNC convention with a MAGA hat, a little kid, some Trump signage, and your phone camera running??

Yeah, I know what an entrapment video is.

But those chicks walked into it, so their bad...

 

Yeah, heaven forbid someone express a political view at a political convention.

 

Just stop. You are only providing more proof that you don't have a clue as to what entrapment entails. Let me help, so as to help you not embareass yourself anymore than you already have.

"A valid entrapment defense has two related elements: (1) government inducement of the crime, and (2) the defendant's lack of predisposition to engage in the criminal conduct. Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58, 63 (198."


"Mere solicitation to commit a crime is not inducement. Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435, 451 (1932). Nor does the government's use of artifice, stratagem, pretense, or deceit establish inducement. Id. at 441. Rather, inducement requires a showing of at least persuasion or mild coercion"

https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-645-entrapment-elements


Entrapment
The Criminal Defense of Entrapment
Entrapment is a defense to criminal charges on the basis that the defendant only committed the crime because of harassment or coercion by a government official. Without such coercion, the crime would never have been committed. Entrapment can be a difficult defense to assert because it requires the defendant to establish that the idea and impetus for the crime was introduced by government officials, and the defendant was not already willing or predisposed to commit the crime. It is also important to note that entrapment can only occur with a government official, such as an FBI official or a police officer, not a private individual. Additionally, since it is an affirmative defense, the criminal defendant has the burden of establishing that entrapment occurred.

Opportunity is not Entrapment
In order to find and eliminate criminal behavior, law enforcement officers are allowed to engage in sting operations, whereby they create circumstances that allow individuals to take criminal actions that they can then be arrested and prosecuted for. These are considered “opportunities” for individuals believed to be involved in criminal behavior to commit crimes. An opportunity is considered very different from entrapment and involves merely the temptation to violate the law, not being forced to do so.

Unlike creating an opportunity, entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers urge, harass, or otherwise overly encourage an individual to commit a crime when he or she would not otherwise do so. Entrapment may result from the use of threats, intimidation, extended fraud, or any other means where the defendant was essentially forced to commit a crime.

For example, law enforcement officers could set up a sting operation for a suspected criminal to commit a burglary. This might involve a law enforcement officer pretending to be a fellow criminal and alerting the defendant of a warehouse shipment that will be arriving shortly and will not be protected by security. If the defendant completes the burglary on the basis of this information, this is not entrapment. The officers have merely created an opportunity for the defendant to commit the crime, and their efforts to do so were entirely legal. If however, the undercover law enforcement officer threatens that the defendant needs to commit the burglary for him, or he will be punished, or shows up every day and harasses the defendant to commit the burglary even though the defendant does not appear interested, this could amount to entrapment. It goes beyond providing an opportunity and involves efforts by law enforcement to force the burglary to occur.

https://www.justia.com/criminal/defenses/entrapment/


Glad I could help.

 

Never said entrapment... I said entrapment video... You rarely help...

 

Is that a thing that you just made up? They are screwed. Yay for the left for giving us another example of left based violence over a red hat.

 

Sweet! Justice will prevail. People need to learn you can't just go around putting your hands on other people. They won't do well in prison with a child crime.

 

Nah... I've heard the term before, but this is a textbook example... Well done, in fact... they got all the button pushing elements in there...

Wonder if anybody will show up in Charlotte with a vagina hat, some Biden gear, a BLM sign and a rolling cellphone camera??

If they do, it likely won't end as quietly as this did...

 

When fighting facism and people willing to put their kids in front of their own fight? Mostly true, although I'm against most physical violence..

 

How anyone could possibly think Trump is a fascist is beyond me. It's just a slur tossed around ignorantly. If Trump were a fascist, he would have disallowed the DNC convention altogether, and these two degenerate women would be in a gulag without a trial.

Just like the race card, the fascist card is already out of credit.

Find something real to complain about.

In fact, the left has done a LOT of damage to the English language and actual political science with the constant incorrect abuse of labels.

We can boil it down...

Racist - n. 1. Anyone who disagrees with a liberal. 2. Anyone who has better, more logical arguments than a liberal. See BIGOT, HOMOPHOBE, SEXIST, FASCIST, MISOGYNIST, NAZI, WHITE NATIONALIST, yada yada....

These terms have ceased to have any real meaning because they're just used as slurs by Democrats and Democrat Leaders.

 

The way I see it, you are all over the place. You justify violent fascist behavior because it's against fascism. I don't know how you can be honest with yourself and still justify such behavior. I'm against all violence just like I believe all lives matter. The left is in a twist and I can't help them. It must be dealt with internally.

 

Oh this is so easy

They have been arrested and face multiple charges and hopefully will have the book thrown at them.

 

You think this is appropriate behavior? I expect federal charges to be filed and hope they are and have the book thrown at them in federal court too.

Why do you support fascist violence?

 

Something that hasn't even been touched on here.

Why is it that young women these days think it is appropriate for them to engage in physical violence against others, including men? And when men even just fight back and protect themselves they hide behind "OH she's a MOTHER" or a "teacher" . WAtch the riots and all the what appear to be young women dressed in their black uniforms carrying weapons using those weapons especailly against police but OH strike the lady and HOW DARE YOU IT'S A WOMAN. Had I been the white guy who tried to retrieve the hat and the one punk cold cocked me I would have decked here but guess who would have been attacked for doing so.

Hey women who want to act like ****** men and engage in violence from now on expect it to be levied back in spades you don't get to hid behind your femininity anymore.

 

Not really, but these chicks weren't smart enough to see the setup here... it'll cost em...

Lucky they didn't mess with Trump's fascist **** in NC... there, the BB's fly...

There are zero federal charges here... throwing a hat in the first degree?? LOL...

 

Federal, state... doesn't matter. If they end up in jail, that's a good thing, since that's where they belong.

 

They'll be out in time to vote... that's the key thing....after that, they're useless to me...

 

Yeah, because that's what matters to you, lol.

Comments like yours just underscore my belief that we're too divided as a country to ever put it back together.

 

ew

 

No basis for the setup charge. How were they "setup" no one forced them to engage in the violence they did. Denying someone their rights as in attacking them expressing their political view and destroying that property can be a federal charge.

Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

 

From the linked article in the OP:

Riley also received a very special phone call from the White House Friday morning

Has anybody been able to find any Confirmation that this "WH Call" actually occurred?

Trump (and his campaign) seem to really be playing up this incident.

Even to the point of Fabricating a Non-Existent Phone Call.

Has this Kid been penciled in to give the Keynote Address yet?

Or will he be given a Prime Time Slot to give one of Trump's Nomination Speeches?

That must be why this non-existent WH "special call" is not being confirmed?

They don't want to ruin the surprise when the Kid gets trotted out at the RNC?

 

Oh, I'm sure Trump called... so this kid can be used again

"Riley, I'm going to get you a new hat, but I would like you to do us a favor, though"