American Women: We're constantly told we're victims of an invisible patriarchy, that we're slaves to our hormones, that without abortion on demand we can't fully be women, that we don't need a man but we need the government. The people that tell women these lies are the same people that pretend to be fighting for us, who have hijacked feminism: the fascist feminists. Whereas once feminists fought for equality, today the FEMISOGYNISTS fight for things like taxpayer funded abortion and universal health care. They fight for women to be able to sleep around like men and ignore the consequences. And most of the time, women don't even know they're being manipulated and lied to. Thankfully, once the lies are exposed, it's easy to see the con. Here are eight ways that fascist feminists are ruining America. Open up the link to get the gory details to each. My favorite is #3 where feminists get quite upset at Sarah Palin for callng herself a feminist. *8. Encouraging Promiscuity #7. Sanctioning Victimhood #6. Dabbling in Misandry #5. Destroying Chivalry #4. Attacking Motherhood #3. Requiring a Feminist Litmus Test (Sarah Palin) #2. Promoting Lies and Manipulation #1. Glorifying Abortion You may have noticed as did I that this group of fascist feminists is really quite destructive in nature. Did you happen to see any ideals of fascist feminism that would actually benefit our American culture? Anyway, here's the link, enjoy! http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2010/08/01/8-ways-fascist-feminists-are-ruining-americas-women/
I can see why that site is called "hot air". All 8 points from your cut-n-pasted article are full of it...
Since your response is nothing but hot air without anything of substance to back up your nonsense, I'll just have to wait to see if there is anyone with a half a brain willing to deny the obvious destructive policy and behavior of these fascist feminists.
That vapid fascist twit crucifies the English language. Palin is no feminist. She is a parasite on women in this country. The idiot thought it was a good idea to charge victims for their forensic rape kits when she was screwing around as Mayor of Wasilla. The legislature even had to pass a law to make sure that nobody was ever that unkind to crime victims again. The snivelling little twit who wrote the article has her head stuck in a very dark place.
Before this thread gets any bigger, I'd like to highlight the article focusing on fascist feminists, and shouldn't be used to describe real feminists with the radicals it was meant for. You know the type as well as you know their scarcity - radicals like http://thefemitheist.blogspot.com/2012/05/doctrines-of-femitheism.html Agreed with the concept, it just stings when I hear a story about some women who felt empowered by getting drunk and having sex with random men from the bar. And it also stings when those same women are stuck half-way upon sobering up and feel cornered into calling the act rape, making it that much harder on the women who are real victims of rape to get the help and sympathy they deserve. No arguments here. Eh, I don't mind if you blame me for it, but I like to hold doors for people without that irrational fear that I stumbled upon a femitheist that will blow up at the thought of men being kind to a woman. Women learning self reliance is great, but if I can't get my children to just be kind to people, I'm going to set them up to at least be kind to women. Sue me. To be or not to be a mother, that is your choice. But I personally would get defensive if someone were to insist to my mother that her life was unfulfilled because she spent the time to raise her children. I'd enjoy derailing this thread further by stats like on average, men work an average of 8 hours to the woman's 7 (http://stats.bls.gov/opub/ted/2007/jul/wk1/art01.htm), or arguments that women will shift forward in the economy because they make up 58% of colleges(http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/education/09college.html?pagewanted=all), or samples like "In a 2010 study of single, childless urban workers between the ages of 22 and 30, the research firm Reach Advisors found that women earned an average of 8% more than their male counterparts." (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704415104576250672504707048.html), or bring up the fact that women cluster in lower-paying jobs (all over the internet, I'll cite http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2011/02/08/good-question-why-do-women-make-less-than-men/), or factor in tendencies to settle down, peer pressure, I - feminists encourage women to make wholesome choices, femitheists tie this into #7, victimhood, and say that the one and only cause of the $0.80 - $1.00 mantra is that sexist pig over there. But back to the matter at hand. Don't you just love how both sides invariably call eachother biased, then justify it because that's what the other guy is doing? I don't see any fox news links, so just leave the baiting out of this debate, k? Not arguing on this point. Allow me to restate that this thread was made to point out how the radical feminists are making it harder for rational feminists, as well as pulling women down undesirable roads.
Here's how a man is taught to think: Even college dropouts like Bill Gates (Microsoft) and Steven Jobs (Apple) "ACHIEVED" because they gave to society with their inventions/creations and HARD WORK Here is how a woman is taught to think: You are considered a worthy "ACHIEVER" if you belong to a radical feminist group that lobbies congress for FREE goods, tax breaks, handouts for their own kind ONLY examples: Women's groups have successfully lobbied for: women getting into college with lower SAT's and high school grades than male counterparts so as to get more than 50% of the college students female. Women getting a tax break on their income tax that men cannot get Business women getting big tax breaks that businessmen cannot get And one of my favorites, women's groups lobbied for and GOT money sent to women who have cancer and are dying at home because they have no health insurance. NOTE: Men dying at home of cancer are inelligable for the funds So they cannot even follow their own law about gender discrimination. nice huh?? and they are supposed the be LEADERS???? the only thing they can lead is showing young women how to be a bigot And I am supposed to respect and admire them? LOL! fat chance. DO something, first. They b!tch and complain to congress for better healthcare for special women, meanwhile, they live 8 years longer than men. that's why I call them bigots. they SUCK. this is really just a small list, there really are many many more. Who can respect these bigoted slackers who only WANT. they don't want to really earn, they just WANT. Gimmee.gimmee.gimmee well, I am happy right now to show these slackjaw feminazis just how much I respect them And please, FemaNazis, don't spam me with warm stories of the very few who really DO do it on their own. The lot of you on average, are a sad, lazy incompetent bunch that only *thinks* you are SPE-shul
It certainly is clear that these misogynists live on a rich diet of OPPRESSION FANTASY fed by propagandists like the RushBlimp. Their lives are crap, and they only manage to exist by blaming their repeated failures and rejection on women.
GREAT POST! Tell me DL, with all your common knowledge of and experience dealing with the scourge femanazi deadbeats of our society, have you come across even one issue, one ideal or one productive and or beneficial sign that these ugly dregs on society have been helpful or useful in any way?
Because it isn't oppression when a minority does it. The problem I have is that the whole set up is unfair to males. Title 9 is killing off a lot a male sports opportunities. Especially in soccer but other sports as well. You can't have more guys playing sports than gals. So since women are not as interested in sports as men, men's teams (and the scholarships that go with them) get cut. No school can have football and soccer -- that's too many men playing sports and you'll run afoul of title 9. So if you want a soccer scholarship to a school, you either give up on a school with a football team, or you try to be a football kicker. Of course if you're a woman, that's not a problem. Almost every uni in America has a women's soccer team, so women don't have to worry about it. In workplaces, women hold a lot of cards men in the same position don't. Officially, you can be sexually harassing people and not even know it. The woman is under no obligation to tell you. She can sue the employer, or go to HR and get you fired however. Women get benefits from the possiblilty of sex discrimination suits as well. If there are two people going for the same position and one is a federally recognized minority, the minority wins as the company doesn't want to risk a lawsuit. And males are presumed to have the advantage in any such situation anyway, thus cannot do the same. In firing, it's kind of the same deal. If you have to let people go, it's safer to let men go than women, as men cannot sue for discrimination as women can. As far as divorce -- honestly it's a woman's world. All you have to do is claim abuse and you never have to let the father see his kids again. Even if the woman takes the high road, she'll still get primary custody of the kids. Men have to fight for the right to visit every other weekend, and in many cases, the court will require an officer to be in the room with him and the kids. And of course, she gets half of any assets he gets plus alimony and child support. In sexual relations, it's stacked as well. If a woman gets drunk and has sex, you just raped her. If a woman says you raped her, you raped her. Men cannot do the same in reverse. A man who gets drunk and has sex cannot accuse the woman of rape. He cannot change his mind after the fact and claim rape. A man cannot do this because under the law, men cannot be raped. Which adds to the problems, as once convicted of rape, a man must now live as criminal forever. He must report his presence in the community, and he must not live anywhere near a school or a day care or a church that runs a school or daycare. He must not have a job that gives him access to the public. That's of course assuming that an employer is willing to risk the potential lawsuits and bad press if anyone knows that the guy in question is a rape convict. Chances are, he and most other felons will remain unemployable.
