So you admit that lots of people where watching the towers when the videos show airplanes slamming into them? Weird. How do you resolve that dissonance with your theory that no planes hit them? They were distracted and didn't realize that what they watched on TV later that night didn't match with what they saw in person? Are you alleging that the government was counting on thousands of people looking in some random direction when their fake planes were supposed to have hit? Your A and B marked photo is taken from an entire block away. Again look at the fire escape on the building to the left.
That is what I want to see. A mythbusters-type experiment where we build a building identical to WTC1, crash an identical plane into it, and observe the results. It should all be strictly monitored inside and out. Since on 9/11, the buildings reacted identically, a test should produce those same results. Then we could lay this issue to rest once and for all.
How much of the 800 million dollars are you going to kick in to convince some nuts of the inevitable?
How pissed are you going to be when the building falls as predicted and they call you a shill and claim that one was demolished too?
Let's just do it like we do everything else: print up some more fake money. If everything works out kosher, it would be worth it to unite the country. - - - Updated - - - That's why I said it all had to be strictly monitored inside and out.
Let's not. The country isn't divided because of 9/11 conspiracy. They country is divided because of the difference in the way people attempt to solve problems. By who? Why is it worth the truckloads of cash it would take to convince a couple hundred deranged people that the building would fall down when hit with an aircraft? Do you really think that would convince them that 19 Muslim hijackers attacked America and the dumb nuts in the U.S. government had nothing to do with it? I doubt it.
Many things divide this country. A major one is the feeling held by many that we don't really live in America anymore. The post-9/11 paradigm has contributed significantly to this. By who? Everybody. Scientists.Engineers. The media (both main stream and alternative). Live feed camera inside the building. Anybody who wants to show up and watch. And you aren't really going to try and act like the 9/11 truth movement consists of a "couple hundred" people, are you? Really?
Let's rebuild the towers just to collapse them again!.. Possibly the most retarded idea I've heard. Truthers would still cry foul when it collapses from fire and demand another 'independent' one is built. Just like a 'new' investigation would bring the same conclusions as the first one, truthers would still cry. The bit where you mentioned it would unite the country made me laugh out loud. Yeah, because the US is soooo divided by 9/11.. that's why there are so little active conspiracy forum members and why less than 40 people showed up at Ground Zero last year to 'spread the truth'... hahaha
No, many people must have/may have/could have seen the buildings go down,more would have heard them go. Less than a handful of people that we know of have said they saw planes. All phones were out, no one could use them, the area around the Towers was in lock down as was NY its self. All videos and photos are professional ones. What are you saying about the fire escape ? The perspective of the 9/11 video is completely out, nothing to do with distance.
No planers. Ignore evidence, present fantasy. [video=youtube;suE77AkSMeE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suE77AkSMeE[/video] Guess all these guys are 'fake' too.
They won't collapse again. They'll come up with something bigger and better next time. America's ignorance of the fiasco being an inside job virtually insures it.
Selling insurance now fraud?......and you have the gall to speak of others ignorance.... 9/11 was NOT an inside job,and you STILL,to this day,have ZERO proof that it was
You have zero proof that it WASN'T an inside job. You have lies told by liars, and an "official" rubber stamped paper.
And so many people were looking at the buildings when the planes that you allege never hit, actually hit. Right? So shouldn't there be thousands of people who went home, saw the news and said, "Jeeze, that's not what I saw?" Less than a handful of people we know remember WWI Does that mean it didn't happen? Your cell phone camera doesn't work when there's no reception? You must have a stupid European model. Ours work just fine. The area around the towers in the location of the impact was visible for miles. It was a clear day, literally hundreds of thousands of people could have had their eyes trained on the towers when the second plane struck. Because you used the very scientific method of listening to a couple of Youtube videos on the internet? How do you plan on backing up this claim, when many of the videos released by the FOIA were from private sources that were, you know, sourced. They can be contacted... Perspective has nothing to do with distance? That's a new one.
Twist and turn Mr Shill ................... it is your home here and you must get so bored ..Jeeeez what a job ! I have shown some evidence it is for people to make up their own minds ......not you nor me, they.
No, your questions are silly and I'm not getting into one of those forum twistings of meaning in a persons words.....find some one else to play with, it is a boring game. been there done that .............
Your claims are silly. The questions point out that fact. I didn't twist anything. If you're having trouble communicating your own thoughts, maybe you should take more time to think them through. You can start by thinking about why the thousands of people on the streets of Manhattan, staring out the windows in their offices, on the shores of the Hudson, and looking across from Brooklyn didn't wonder where they aircraft came from when they watched them strike over and over on the news later that day. You posted this image: and claimed "They have cut the tops off two buildings." I posted both images as they currently appear in Google maps. It's clear to see they were taken from two different blocks, and the building marked B in the image inset in the upper left hand corner is not the same building that is marked B in the video still frame. This isn't a problem with missing building tops. This is a problem of comparing two photographs taken from two different positions. Also, could you remind me who said this: Because I have a hard time believing it's the same person who said this:
You won't play the shill game and dance the dance? Shame on you! How can the propaganda spread if you don't "play along"? You could conceivably put several folks out of work, you know. Kudos to you for recognizing the intentional distortion!
