9/11 World Trade Center Totally fake! But you still believe it!

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Sep 1, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,519
    Likes Received:
    1,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Totally fake!


    But you would still believe it!




    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i5v_vioaMU"]Totally fake! But you would still believe it! - YouTube[/ame]




    Those living on the official fantasy must be on some seriously good drugs!

    The video makes a good case.
     
  2. ar10

    ar10 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A couple of points:

    I am a truther. I believe we are not being told the truth of the events of 9/11.

    However, this video hurts the case of the truth movement.

    Eyewitness reports said planes hit buildings in NY city. The second plane, millions of eyes were on those towers.

    What few videos that have been released, have been low res home videos. The type of video that can not follow fast moving events well.

    The distortions you see, most all can be reduced to video quality, and in some cases, third and forth generation videos that who knows how they have been manipulated.

    From my observations, something took place that day, that softened steel, and even dustified steel (Google Judy Woods). If the towers were being made softer somehow in selected places, it is possible a plane could fly into the towers, without smashing into it, or smashing into the sides of it.

    I do not know what happened that day, but 110 story office buildings did not fall to the ground, in a rubble pile 20 feet high in ten seconds, because of an explosive fire on the 89th floor.

    Look, think, reason, deduce, listen, read, and follow the chain of events.

    9/11 was not what we were told by the powers that ruled over this event, and reported the event to us.

    You video, with the bad music, just makes the search for the real truth even harder. It is called Dis-Information, and it is disseminated by the people that are sitting on the truth, and do not want the truthers finding it.
     
  3. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Twoofer on twoofer violence....its a beautiful thing.
     
  4. Trinnity

    Trinnity Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Absolutely Pathetic !!!!
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ever wonder if at some point some of them after hearing this stuff, would stop and say, 'you're messing with me,right?'
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not really, no. Comparisons with a cult are fairly apt.
     
  7. Margot

    Margot Account closed, not banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    62,072
    Likes Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are some raving nutters who think the whole thing was an illusion using holograms. ROTFLMAO.
     
    Trinnity and (deleted member) like this.
  8. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What definition of "cult"?
     
  9. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The academic literature on the topic does align with cults. Alternately, some journal articles have drawn closer comparisons to mass hysteria/delusion, like Haley's Comet freak outs or the War of the Worlds.
     
  10. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,486
    Likes Received:
    2,416
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes, you are right. Hundreds of people are in on this, every video and photo taken was really made by the CIA, and every cameraman was a CIA operative.

    And everybody who watched this live was in on it too.
     
  11. happy fun dude

    happy fun dude New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,501
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Whose literature? Steven Jones'? Griffin's? And "cults" really needs to be defined so I know exactly what it is you're trying to say. cheers.

    Which one's your favorite?
     
  12. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,519
    Likes Received:
    1,728
    Trophy Points:
    113

    When candy shows up in my thread you know its painful! LMAO
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,519
    Likes Received:
    1,728
    Trophy Points:
    113

    you dont sound like a truther to me?


    here is a blurry fox video for ya! You know when they cgi the crap out of it thats what happens.




    [​IMG]

    they really screwed the timing on that job anyway by blowing out the side first LOLOL


    [​IMG]







    you sure they didnt see it on tv? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    woods is another side show. energy beams do not completely fracture the molecular bonds in steel.
    Certainly will not cause dustification like this crap.

    [​IMG]

    takes a micro nuke to do that.

    They had to have their fun and test out a few new toys
     
  14. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,519
    Likes Received:
    1,728
    Trophy Points:
    113

    the ones that talked are dead ya know.
     
  15. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,519
    Likes Received:
    1,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am thinking that the official story spewers have a love affair with loonacy.


    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfuBREMXxts"]I'm a Believer[/ame]
     
  16. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just to count, here, in the last week, we've had:


    1. Controlled demolition
    2. Death beams from space
    3. Koko's new "Micro-nuke"
    4. Missile
    5. "False flag"
    6. and "I don't know, but I know it's not how they said it."
    Sweet.
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Question for koko,Why didn't the 'mico nuke's' EMP fry every bit of elecronics the recue workers and police had?
     
  18. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,519
    Likes Received:
    1,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    since when does an li6 nuke fry anything LOL

    well except for official story tellers brains?
     
  19. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,519
    Likes Received:
    1,728
    Trophy Points:
    113

    who said death beams from space, probly some ass wipe story teller.

    the rest are semantics.

    think about it.

    nah thats asking to much.
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    EMP happens during a nuke blast...electronics have to be hardened
     
  21. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,519
    Likes Received:
    1,728
    Trophy Points:
    113
    sidestep.

    no electronics does not need to be hardened
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Okay then, explain how the EMP from a nuclear bomb in the WTC wouldnt have fried all the ordinary electronic devices on 9/11

    Then expllain why the survivors found in the stairwell weren't cooked as well
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,519
    Likes Received:
    1,728
    Trophy Points:
    113


    they have come a long way since the 60's.

    nukes are approved demolition devices, up to 100kt.

    Micro nukes have been around since the late 50s, old news.

    You can get the blast pattern in several shapes, from several thousand bucks to a million or so for the larger ones.

    Its purpose isnt to flatten and bow it half way across new york, its putpose is to ?fracture" on a molecular level the iron.

    When that happens all you gotts do is sneeze and the whole thing steel cement, everything literally shatters to dust. like a window when you throw brick through it.

    Thats what causes this kind of stuff:

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]

    If I were working ground zero and did not see one desk or toilet I would have been otta there. Mama didnt raise no foo.
     
  24. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,486
    Likes Received:
    2,416
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Demolition Devices? Are you actually serious?

    And yes, I am well aware of "Operation Plowshare". This was an attempt by the US government to show the uses of small atomic bombs for excavation purposes. They detonated a 105 kt atomic bomb in 1962, to see how effective it would be. And over the next decade they tried 26 more times.

    Basically, it was a total failure. Because it was subsurface, it released a huge amount of radioactive fallout. And the deep round craters left were of no real use.

    [​IMG]

    So here is my question. If the WTC was destroyed by a nuke, where is the radioactivity? Radioactive particles would have drifted far and wide, with a noticeable fallout pattern in Europe. And blast debris would have been found for miles around.

    Do you have any proof of this?


    And there are no "micro nukes". None, period. Even claiming that there is such a thing is largely ignorance.

    This is because "nukes" (thermonuclear warheads) are giant explosives, detonated by an atomic warhead. The smallest atomic weapon used was the M388 warhead, attached to the Davy Crockett Recoilless Rifle. It was a 4 inch recoilless rifle, that fired an atomic warhead that was between 10 and 20 tons yield, the smallest possible.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khyZI3RK2lE"]M65 Recoiless Nuclear Rifle - YouTube[/ame]

    And even this explosion was gigantic compared to what happened at the WTC.
     
  25. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It appears as though koko may have seen 'The Peacemaker' one too many times.
    My next tack was going to be the radiation,by you beat me to it.
     

Share This Page