9 Things Truthers can NEVER explain

Discussion in '9/11' started by Ronstar, Jun 10, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,865
    Likes Received:
    3,566
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it did not descend at free fall speed whatsoever.

    Yes that claim has been screamed and has been heard by everyone for over a decade but it is an absolute proven lie.

    It did not fall at free fall speed period.

    There is not one fact or piece of evience which disputes the offiical story which is why you only obfuscate and and never produce any such evidence.
     
  2. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    now you have to show
    why the NIST is wrong.....
    what do you have?

    - - - Updated - - -

    NIST NCSTAR 1A page 46 fig 3-15
    are you saying that the NIST is wrong?
    and if so, can you document this assertion?
     
  3. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,865
    Likes Received:
    3,566
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It does not say that the building fell at free fall speed
     
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you get the 2.25 sec of acceleration
    9.8 m/s^2 ..... did you see that part?
     
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,865
    Likes Received:
    3,566
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You do not even define free fall speed correctly try googling it.

    And no the page you cite makes no such claim.
     
  6. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    GET A CLUE!
    its not "Free Fall Speed" its FREE FALL ACCELERATION.
     
  7. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,865
    Likes Received:
    3,566
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have said both and NIST says neither
     
  8. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    And it's an AVERAGE. Go look at the graphs and explain why there are points below free fall acceleration and points above free fall acceleration. Explain this genericBob. Can you also explain why, as soon as all these explosives SIMULTANEOUSLY went off, the remainder of WTC7 didn't IMMEDIATELY start free fall acceleration?
     
  9. ralfy

    ralfy Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    28
  10. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
  12. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    First of all, you're overestimating WTC security & employees. Why? See: art students. Also: maintenance people were constantly coming in & out of the buildings.
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And they wouldn't have been noticed had they been doing something other than cleaning up,buffing the floors or taking out the trash?
     
  14. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your question was answered already in my post you quoted - the art students.
     
  15. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ahh the art students...<eyeroll>
     
  16. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    No answer genericBob? Can you post the graph that shows a CONSISTENT line of free fall or are there points in the graph with a line drawn between them to show an average? What about the initial segment of NON FREE FALL that happened when all you supposed explosives went off simultaneously? How that that happen?
     
  17. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Getting past security is the easy part. Go back and read my post on what the real problem with that theory is.
     
  18. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    your original post makes assumptions about the type of demolition to be carried out. Different strategies would involve different techniques and could be done in a variety of different ways.

    Take for example, the concept that all the work could have been done above the office ceiling and therefore out-of-sight. &/or explosives hidden in the elevator shafts. There are a multitude of scenarios possible.

    The bottom line with all this is the fact that in order to produce the result observed in the case of WTC1,2 & 7 there had to be an additional source of energy ( and focused energy ) that was not the potential energy of the mass of the building and not the heat energy of the fire(s) in the building(s).
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No,not even,your scenarios won't fly
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Right! There was gravity and kinetic energy, too.
     
  21. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
  23. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    From the article:

     
  24. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    1) Dead men tell no tales.

    2) Workers in the floors below would be unaware of maintenance work going on above them unless they were specifically informed.

    3) The logistics of the "operation" would have been well-within feasible application.

    4) IF 9/11 was more than religiously fanatic Muslims the absence of "smoking gun" evidence at Ground Zero would be par for the course.
     
  25. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Also from the article:

    And there's a lot more you ignored post-denials.
     

Share This Page