911 - US Government Malfeasance and Coverup

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Sep 1, 2023.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is a starting point to compile a comprehensive list of cases of reported government malfeasance re 911.

    The government has a duty and obligation in trust to provide accurate reports.

    The first of several cases:

    9/11 mystery: Contradictory witness accounts left out by official report - 'no accident'

    THE OFFICIAL investigation into 9/11 “left out” more than 118 eyewitness reports from firefighters that described “explosions” at the scene, according to a Channel 5 documentary.


    A documentary on Channel 5, titled ‘The Missing Evidence,’ detailed the incredible revelation that the official investigation into 9/11 - the 9/11 Commission - apparently omitted 118 eyewitness reports.

    However, according to the Channel 5 documentary, the official report investigating the attacks do not account for the hundreds of eyewitness testimony of explosions at the site.

    The documentary narration reads: "In all, over a 118 NY firefighters claims they heard explosions - yet their testimony is not addressed in the official report."

    One firefighter, Jimmy Grillo, told cameras at the time: “There was a heavy duty explosion.”

    Another firefighter Tyrone Johnston added: “There was a third explosion, that’s when the lobby collapsed on us.”

    In reported testimony, firefighter Rich Banaciski said: “I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television they blow up these buildings.

    "It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions."

    Fellow firefighter Frank Campagna also said: “You see three explosions and then the whole thing coming down."

    Richard Gage, who leads the conspiracy theory group Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, claimed the omission was “no accident”.

    https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...cy-theory-controlled-explosions-terror-attack




    The subject matter of this thread is malfeasance, the above is a small sample of reports the government has received and negligently failed to investigate, in fact in many of these cases did not even report it in violation of federal guidelines.

    I am looking for more, next up another case regarding the pentagon as soon as I get time to put it together.
     
    Scott likes this.
  2. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,608
    Likes Received:
    11,709
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only the most credulous amongst us do not understand it was an inside job.
     
  3. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,872
    Likes Received:
    3,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong

    All intelligent people know it was not and that your claim is laughable fiction
     
  4. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    4,899
    Likes Received:
    750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The sheer irony in that statement. Conspiracy theorists are without doubt THE most credulous group in society. And the most hilarious thing, is that there must be about a dozen different batshit theories:
    • No planes
    • Just two real planes.
    • Three planes and one fake.
    • Planes and nukes.
    • Planes and space weapons.
    • No planes and nukes.
    • No planes and space weapons.
    • Planes but not the real ones!
    • The Jews did it(meh!)
    • The Saudis did it.
    • Al Qaeda did it but the US let it happen.
    • A herd of wildebeest were somehow involved (forgive me for making one up - they all are anyway!).
    Nope. Not left out. Just not relevant. All building fires have things exploding. Should they include all the eye-witnesses on the opposite side of the building who had their view of the plane obscured? I watched a documentary where this student saw the back explosion and went on to the streets telling everyone he met that it was a bomb. It's just not relevant.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2023
  5. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,262
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,872
    Likes Received:
    3,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
  7. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,262
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The viewers can watch it and come to their own conclusions.
     
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,872
    Likes Received:
    3,568
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They all agree it is fictional bullshit

    You know it as well
     
  9. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    4,899
    Likes Received:
    750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You've spammed that video around 90 times on this forum. What viewers do you think are going to sit through nearly 5hrs of cherry-picked-debunked-to-death batshit?

    Who do you think is going to be interested in this same crap 10 years on? It was useless when it first came out and nothing has changed in all that time!

    Have you seen this blog?
    Screw Loose Change
    Or this?
    9/11 Conspiracy Theory Debunking | World Trade Center Myths (popularmechanics.com)
    This short interview:
    NOVA - Official Website | Debunking 9/11 Bomb Theories (pbs.org)

    Maybe watch this!


    You keep making this spam statement about the viewers deciding - well they can see the debunks just as easily and to an educated person, orders of magnitude more believable.
     

Share This Page