what you need to understand is koko has the goods and the spot light to illuminate certain opponents so people can see them for the fools they are.
well coming from certain people ignore status is a badge of honor. Not my fault the fire is too hot for you in this kitchen.
Like all nists PROBLYS, SHOULDAS, COULDA, MOST LIKELYS, CLEARLY, HAD TO BE, and the rest of the pile they (*)(*)(*)(*) on the american people? Sorry reality bites so hard into the OS, shouldnt tell such big lies.
Very interesting. What causes me doubts about your point is that the poles in the second video appear to be thicker, even more, if the video is old, then the poles are made of a heavy iron construction,. Like older cars metal sheet compared with new ones, the poles around the Pentagon appear to be thinner and of a lighter construction, but it is only my appreciation. But surely my concern about your second video is that the airplane appears to have "an emergency landing", this is to say, the airplane has reduced its speed in order to land. On the other hand, the airplane that hit the Pentagon didn't slow its speed but apparently did the contrary. The difference is that speed changes the result of the impacts. See, use a piece of paper and slowly pass its long edge over your arm and the paper will be bent, but do it the faster you can and the paper will bent less and probably will cut your skin. The speed of the airplane of the second video was so slow that the wings of the vehicle just broke like fractured bones, but I don't think that the same will happen if an airplane hits the same poles at a more higher speed.
Wooden poles are not 'designed' at all. They're tree trunks-solid timber, cut to a uniform diameter and length. Furthermore wood varies in density and structure. There is no guaranteed uniformity of density or strength in a tree trunk. You can have two identical pieces of timber; one might be very dry and well-seasoned, the other green timber. They will each react to stresses very differently, but as far as I'm aware telegraph poles aren't 'designed' to break away or deflect upon impact.
I love how after 21 pages koko is still trying to use evidence of AA77 hitting the Pentagon, as evidence that AA77 didn't hit the Pentagon. Only a truther could be so stupid.
LoL no kidding. He really is an amazing individual, and I think WTC Dust would have a life long boyfriend right here. We should almost play match maker. He also claims to be a lawyer, yes a lawyer. While he can't type properly, spell coherently, back up his claims with evidence, present any evidence in a realistic manner, or even come across as an individual with a high school education, he continues to claim he's a lawyer. If he were in court I'd imagine it would go like this: Judge: Your client is on trial for murder. We have his DNA, gps tracking shows he was there, blood on his clothes, and statements from him saying that he intended on doing this murder, and in fact volunteered. Koko: yyyoooooouuuutttttuuuubbbbbeeee (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)! *plays (*)(*)(*)(*)ty, edited, cropped, grainy video of a street corner, in the middle of the night, that is not even in the same state that the crime happened* Koko: See what I'm saying your honor? My client is obviously innocent, and it was the nuns that killed them. You saw how dark it was there, that's their outfits. Judge: The defendent is guilty, life in prison Koko addresses client, "Look this is a government conspiracy, as soon as I blow the lid off of 9/11 I'll get you out."