A Democrat's Pornographic Campaign Finance

It's the shorthand version of the word pornography which is automatically filtered out.

It should be completely obvious from the context that I'm not even discussing the bad orange man so that would go without saying that I'm not talking about that tape.

Literally not everything in the entire world is about Trump. Some people have the ability to talk about other things like perhaps the actual topic

 

oh, I did not know the word porn was filtered out by this site, my apologies then

 

what I said is copied directly below. How you even remotely interpret that to have something to do with the completely mythological existence of some urine tape that Democrats seem fixated on.... Is anyone's guess. How many letters are in the word p*** and how many letters are in the word pee?

My apologies for evidently causing you to have a misunderstanding by speaking about the topic



"Imagine this lady putting an actual p*** tape out there for the world to see and then acting indignant that people would actually share the tape in the future"

 

I see no problem with it, particularly since it was done as an activity with her husband. There is literally nothing immoral about what she did. I guess it could qualify as revenge porn the way it's being used against her, but the bottom line should be so what? It's not relevant to her candidacy. Maybe a generational divide here. I suspect a very small proportion of persons younger than me would have a problem with it.

 

It's extremely low class and indicative of a very poor decision making process.

 

It's low class to make porn? No, I don't think so. I guess I can get the preference against this kind of behavior in a partner if you're not into anything exhibitionistic, but that's just private sexual stuff. In any case it clearly doesn't hurt anybody. All sides are just engaging in consensual sexual interactions here, well at least until the video got archived and shared with an unintended audience later.

 

You may be right, although the fact that they solicited money for their exhibitions makes it seem tawdry to me. Personally, I would not want such a person representing me in any legislature.

 

Do you think there's any father anywhere that would want their daughter making porn?

 

My daughters are young so it's hard to imagine. My only potential problem with it would be if they pursued that as a career instead of something more intellectual/fulfilling. I could say the same for most careers though, I would always think they could do better. But if it was their hobby with their spouse. No I don't think I'd care at all in that case.

 

I thought the word you used was "piss" as in "piss tape", had to guess as p*** could be any of those

sorry for being confused by what four-letter word that started with "p" you were star'g out

 

The porn is pretty bad too, honestly. Unenthusiastic.

 

Nude modeling is porn dude. Its fancy porn, still porn. You can tell by how if you show it to a child its a crime.

 

In Virginia such a tape would need to be sent out "maliciously" or sold.
This was freely published, and doesn't seem to target her at all except for the fact she's in it. Tons of captured amateur porn from that site ends up on porn hub and other hub sites.
So I don't think she can prove her claim, but the reason she frames it that way is because if she could prove that it would be a crime in her state.

 

WTF. Playboy is porn dude. Can a child buy one? No? Porn.

 

am I the only one who wants to see the video??

 

Its not private, it was live streamed and she received tips for her unenthusiastic performance.
She did porn with her husband for money, allowing strangers to comment upon their marital bed. Its ****ing weird.

 

I mean, you haven't yet?
Spoiler alert: Its bad.

 

Privacy is relative. It wasn't really intended for the videos to go completely public.

It's one of many sexual quirks people can have, liking to show off their sex life to strangers. It's a harmless one when done this way. Could be harmful if they were doing it in the public park and making unsuspecting people uncomfortable.

Having a weird harmless sexual quirk isn't really relevant to public office, or at least it shouldn't be.

 

I watched like 15 seconds of one but I've been at work. Had to have the sound off. Her body looked good. No complaints about her face. Camera work sucked but that's common in amateur. It's true that there's no substitute for genuine enthusiasm in porn, though. That's why good amateur porn is better than good professional porn. Though I guess some of them really do love their jobs.

 

Playboy is out of print. No need to worry.

When it was in print, it was reliably liberal.

I guess you guys are Puritans until the politics says you aren’t. You LBGQ+ allies are anything but puritanical, especially when it comes to kids.

 

Again: Dude is saying a nudie mag that shows tits and ***** isn't porn.
That's just silly, and an incorrect statement. One might even go so far as to say their knowledge on the subject seems sorely lacking.

I don't give a **** what the political bent of a porno mag is. I used to beat my meat like it owed me money to some of those sluts, that's what the magazine was for.

I like my politicians to not be a whore, yes. That includes sucking corpo dick, or getting paid to cam an unenthusiastic **** with their cuckold husband.
I don't give a **** that she did porn, I give a **** she wants to serve in the legislature while on the net sucking dick for money.

 

It was literally streamed to the public. Anyone who has seen chaturbate or pornhub knows those streams get captured.

It is, and most people don't want to see a congresscritter in that position. It erodes their authority.

 

The archives exist, reportedly, in addition to more recent and current videos that are still being livestreamed ...if the article is to be believed. Media being what it is today, who knows...

 

depends on how the law was written, one could say this was posted maliciously to cause her to lose her potential job - some of these laws were written quickly to address a issue, so could be sloppy laws

 

yep, all a child has to use is a search engine to see the past first lady