A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid

Discussion in 'Coronavirus Pandemic Discussions' started by Woogs, Dec 1, 2020.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

  1. Woogs

    Woogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,395
    Likes Received:
    2,563
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Full title:
    • A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should

      A peer review of the paper on which most Covid testing is based has comprehensively debunked the science behind it, finding major flaws. They conclude it’s utterly unsuitable as a means for diagnosis – and the fall-out is immense.
      Last week, I reported on a landmark ruling from Portugal, where a court had ruled against a governmental health authority that had illegally confined four people to a hotel this summer. They had done so because one of the people had tested positive for Covid in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test – but the court had found the test fundamentally flawed and basically inadmissible.

      Now the PCR testing supremacy under which we all now live has received another crushing blow. A peer review from a group of 22 international experts has found 10 “major flaws” in the main protocol for such tests. The report systematically dismantles the original study, called the Corman-Drosten paper, which described a protocol for applying the PCR technique to detecting Covid.

      The Corman-Drosten paper was published on January, 23, 2020, just a day after being submitted, which would make any peer review process that took place possibly the shortest in history. What is important about it is that the protocol it describes is used in around 70 percent of Covid kits worldwide. It’s cheap, fast – and absolutely useless.
    https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/

    The above snippet from the RT article is spot-on as to what is stated in the actual peer review. I suggest going to the review itself and reading it. It is written clearly enough that the average person can grasp the gist of it.
    Here's the link:

    https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  2. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,940
    Likes Received:
    11,879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This has been a long time coming.

    Many have spoken out for months about the uselessness of the PCR test. Even the CDC notes anything over 20 cycles is unreliable.

    Many labs run as many as 45 cycles as this layman understands it.

    The anecdotal evidence on the street regarding the deception and false positives is huge.

    The entire fraud of the plandemic is based upon a test that is the functional equivalent of a coin toss.

    Will MSM remain silent on this? Yes, of course.
     
    drluggit and sec like this.
  3. sec

    sec Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    31,813
    Likes Received:
    7,889
    Trophy Points:
    113
    since this science doesn't support tyranny, then it will not see the light of day
     
    Eleuthera and drluggit like this.
  4. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Many at Bubba's Bar and Grill...

    It's not perfect, but it's what we got, and there is plenty of need for it.

    Welcome to reality, since this is your first day, we can find you a tutor to go over the basics.
     
    fiddlerdave and FreshAir like this.
  5. Woogs

    Woogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,395
    Likes Received:
    2,563
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Honest question .... did you read the paper cited in the OP? Do you not see the inherent flaws in this test even under ideal conditions?

    Amplify these flaws by administering this test all over the country with pop-up drive-through testing conducted by people of variable qualifications under variable conditions and it gets even more "not perfect".

    Then, formulate policy based on this more "not perfect" and then you have your "reality".
     
  6. FreshAir

    FreshAir Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    151,457
    Likes Received:
    63,562
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the testing just gives us a idea of the hotspots, other than that, do not pay much attention to that number as it's always been known the tests are not 100%

    probably a lot more positives than reported, but it's the best we got
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2020
  7. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yes.

    This is real world stuff. If you were to run the numbers, you would find you can do a lot of good with the test, as other countries have proven.

    When thousands are dying, the Right wing poo throwing habit is deplorable.
     
  8. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,192
    Likes Received:
    28,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Even when shown evidence that you're wrong, you're still unwilling to acknowledge it. Sad.
     
  9. Woogs

    Woogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,395
    Likes Received:
    2,563
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The paper was not generated in the US, thus is not "the Right wing poo throwing habit".

    What I find disturbing is that, all these months later, this test is just now being seriously, methodically questioned by peers. Had such questioning seen the light of day earlier, we might have a better rapid test than this pcr test. In this case, the far from perfect has been deemed good enough and we've run with it. The FDA, for instance, has approved over 100 manufacturers for this test. It has created its own momentum.

    To question why an inherently flawed test became the gold standard by which people are being quarantined and businesses closed is hardly flinging poo.
     
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2020
    sec likes this.
  10. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I wasn't talking about the paper.

    You keep missing the obvious, the test works well enough that you can construct a regime to control the virus, as so many other countries have done.

    Science takes time.. it's hardly a surprise that it took months for this to show up in public, check and see when they started working on it.
     
  11. Woogs

    Woogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,395
    Likes Received:
    2,563
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, in this case all of 24 hours LOL.

    Normally, peer review is a time-consuming process since at least two experts from the field have to critically read and comment on the submitted paper. In our opinion, this paper was not peer-reviewed. Twenty-four hours are simply not enough to carry out a thorough peer review. Our conclusion is supported by the fact that a tremendous number of very serious design flaws were found by us, which make the PCR test completely unsuitable as a diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Any molecular biologist familiar with RT-PCR design would have easily observed the grave errors present in the Corman-Drosten paper before the actual review process.
     
    Eleuthera likes this.
  12. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And quite carefully, one might add...
     
  13. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,940
    Likes Received:
    11,879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Awesome propaganda talking point combined with an awesome display of cognitive dissonance and denial! :applause:
     
  14. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,940
    Likes Received:
    11,879
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You and the NFL keep missing the obvious--the test is bogus and never meant for diagnostic purposes according to its inventor Kary Mullis in 1986.

    I had to laugh at the NFL Commissioner's remarks yesterday regarding their Covid Protocols. He is as ignorant of the many failures of the PCR test as the average Joe on the street. All the nonsense the NFL has been going through, based completely on a bogus test.
     
  15. (original)late

    (original)late Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2015
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    4,001
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nice fantasy, hope you enjoy it.

    Back in the real world, you can fight the infection, many countries have, and testing is a crucial part of that.

    It is my opinion that this disinformation campaign is another one of Putin's stunts, and we even have one or two pro trolls here pushing that propaganda.
     
    fiddlerdave likes this.

Share This Page