a plea — diversity not a good thing!

No you don't. Point to one incident where I mentioned or excoriated a black man for his dirty deeds of murder, including those blacks that represent that long list of serial killers.

 

Cow cookies. He spenmt a bit of tome hanging with the scum bags at Elohim City and he blew the Murrah Building on the same day that their supposed "Messiah" was being executed for murder. Why do think the sorry sack of crap was selling The Turner Diaries?

They're all fellow travellers or useful idiots.

Add up the KKK church bombings in the 1960s and the various other bombs they have set, like the Atlanta Olympics and a few abortion clinincs and the numbers get pretty impressive. And don't forget the white nationalist dirtbag who set a bomb for the MLK Day parade in Spokane. Luckily, people were watching for that kind of thing.

I don't think lefties killed anywhere near as many people in the Vietnam protests, and the death toll of OWS is hardly significant compared to any other gatherings that large.

 

Leftist (after having all of their fallacious catchphrases and hypocrisy dissected): "u r ignrant".

It's ironic really.

 

I'm pretty sure nobody here argued that we should restrict marriages, just mass immigration. Have fun bashing your strawman, and any time you want to debate we'll be here in reality.

 

So you dont mind mixed marriages? Your racist friends sure do.

 

I don't condemn mixed marriages in themselves. If two people want to get married and they are decent people, I have no problem with that, whatever race they are. I would be concerned if the government organised enforced race mixing combined with interracial relationship propaganda disturbingly woven into popular entertainment media. I'm concerned.

 

wtf does that even mean?

 

Try this: Learn English Free Online.

 

You get it -- if the state uses taxpayer money to specifically promote a type of relationship. It's not that complicated.

 

And where do you see this happening? During the Jim Crow days, such was the case, but not today.

 

I'm quite sick of so many pro-race mixers throwing words like murderer, innocent and even holocaust around to describe racial segregation, alongside a continuous and sustained labeling of all opponents as "far-right, ignorant, white trash". The most annoying thing is that these words are never accompanied by any tenable position or serious arguments, just the same old lines - "oh but we are all human", "oh it is infringing on freedom", "oh you're just like the nazis" - way to state the fricking obvious! SO WHAT? What's bad about segregating different populations within the species of homosapien that are so different, when they do not all want to live together - when it will just lead to tensions and resentment?

But don't get me wrong, there are other pro-race mixers here who avoid such argumentation, although I have yet to meet one that will actually make a logical argument they can defend outside of intuitive emotionalism and rhetorical nonsense.

The inflammatory and provocative style of the common pro-race mixer argumentation is not something advocates of choice- the right to live and work amongst ones own kind- should be confronted by. There are many pro-race mixing people who reply with as many labels and ineffective language. We should respond with an embrace of such claims where they are truthful so that we devalue and destroy intuitive misconceptions and false attitudes which stifle debate and avoid actual argumentation. The non sequiturs of the "oppression" labels should be confronted with comic embrace and unfazed apathy. "Yes, I don't particularly like middle easterners" - "yes I am the happy supporter of free abortions for Hispanics" - "of course I happily endorse the massacring of those who breed out of control." You can throw anything these pro-race mixers spew out right back!

The only reason race-mixing rhetoric of the nature described above actually works is because advocates of segregation embrace them and indulge in attempting to refute these false labels as well as using them themselves. Since race mixers already know they are false and since they do nothing but stifle argumentation I propose we apathetically ignore these linguistic tactics and only utilize them so as to force mixers to utilize actual argumentation.

If false labels do not illicit a knee jerk reaction, race mixers will have nowhere to hide in the debate - they will be forced to show why they are right and defend it with sustained reasoning; an occurrence that is far too rare these days.


NOTE: This entire post is actually a satire of another thread made in the "Abortion" section. Feel free to compare the two.
http://www.politicalforum.com/abortion/250963-my-argument-against-pro-lifers.html
I just find it so ironic that the people on this forum who are so concerned about minorities are the same ones who have no problem killing unborn babies.

 

...?... Give one example of the words "murderer, innocent and even holocaust" being used in this regard please.

haha! So you are nazis and you infringe on freedom? bahahahaha

Because they want to live together and breed together. If they dont they can get land and create their own little (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up communes.

So you actually endorse open murder of individuals who have done nothing wrong. Why am I not surprised! LOL

Form above, you just said you were nazi, so...

You called YOURSELF a nazi. Hilarious.

Your satire is (*)(*)(*)(*), although hilarious. Killing babies is fine. You have not once shown otherwise. As for race mixing, anything that goes against people's individual interests purely due to the interests of a minority is immoral. People can race mix as much as they like.

 

Those of us who do want to live together like rational people have no reason to modify our behavior to accomodate people so immature that they find that behavior intimidating. It is none of your business with whom i choose to bump fuzzies, as long as the other party is a consenting adult Homo sapiens.

There is no such right once the practice of that preferrence begins to lead to de jura exclusion of non-whites from the main stream of ecconomic activity. If you work for me and I find that a black person is highly qualified to hold a position in which you will come into contact with him, I am in no way obligated to tell him that I can't hire him to accomodate you. Grow up and accept that the world does not revolve around you.

What's wrong with opposing rape?

 

Breeding out of control when you cannot even support yourself is all kinds of wrong.

 

I totally agree. How does that change anything I have said?

 

He said

in a clearly somewhat tongue in cheek manner, but even assuming it wasn't, and you derived

but now you are agreeing breeding out of control is wrong. Which is it?

 

This makes no sense. Breeding out of control is bad for the environment, but that does not mean that anybody has a right to take action against the practice.

 

Hey Anders, great post up above. Implied in your beautiful description of the leftist madness concerning their favoring of miscegenation is the fact that they use this dastardly issue (ironically) to bash Republican and Conservative politicians as being unfeeling, insensitive and often Neanderthal in our rejection of policies that give succor to these multicultural wards of the state in the form of welfare benefits/entitlements etc. Long gone are days when our immigrants came from fine European stock where they would come to America and actually learn the English language, school themselves and dare I say 'WORK' so as to support their families. Instead we have this 'touchy-feely' lefty mentality that grovels to any sign of human weakness, and then exploits the successful either through welfare redistribution or in outright over taxing them.

Funny how those immigrants of the late 19th and early 20th centuries learned to pick themselves up by their own bootstraps while the illegals, miscegenationists and multiculturalists of today rely on big govt socialism to make it from foodstamp holiday to the next. Very troubling to say the least.

 

I am just trying to point out the blatent hypocrisy of liberals, complaining about what they see as "racism", while demanding the right to kill the unborn, who are allegedly "not humans". Just imagaine what a liberal would say if someone claimed Blacks weren't humans!

I think abortionists, with all their anti-baby rhetoric, should be charged with hate crimes when they basically use a vacuum cleaner to tear the baby into little pieces while it is still alive.

Apparently the mother's right to easy convenience is much more important than the right to live amongst one's own kind. At least I am not the one advocating killing people.

Tell that to the liberals-- the ones who are banning incandescent light bulbs and forcing everyone to use low-flow shower faucets. The ones that are trying to make guns illegal, and have already suceeded in several places.
Liberals have no problem forcing inconvenient regulations on people to "protect" the environment or public safety.

It is in a way, very ironic... Of course, liberals absolutely refuse to consider the very policies that would most protect the environment and protect public safety...

If we just sterilised welfare moms that keep churning out babies, and imposed racial segregation, there would be NO REASON for environmental regulations and gun control (at least not for the white people anyway)

 

Anders Hoveland has won the debate.

 

There are idiots who believe that, and are planning an uprising to exterminate them from North America, along with all others whom they consider "mud people." A fetus is human tissue, but, until it reaches a certain point of development, is not a human person with self-awareness or opinions. There is not parallel here.

You are proposing that only those who agree with your position should have any rights of self-determination once they have achieved awareness.
Be advised that there are people with firearms who will do their utmost to prevent your position from prevailing.

There is no right to live "among one's own kind beyond your choice of whom to marry. You have no business dictating who lives on land that you do not own. You have only the right to object to their doing something that causes environmental harm, independent of the race of the person dwelling on or doing business on such property. End of discussion amongt rational people.

Cow cookies. That's what it would take vto re-build your fantasy world.

You have no right to waste finite, sometimes too-scarce common resources. If a regulation is reasonable to prevent your doing harm to the commons in pursuit of your own wealth, TOO FREAKING BAD. The world does not revolve around you. And don't get your knickers in a knot about "liberals" trying to ban guns. It was right-wingers, cops, to be exact, who pushed through the brain-dead gun laws in NYC and California. The cops in California were scared stupid of the Black Panthers and decided that the best idea was to disarm them and only let people they knew and trusted have firearms. I'm a liberal and I have a closet full of arms and ammo against the day that the white nationalists crawl out of the sewer and try to call themselves in charge.

Which is to say that only people like you should have any legal rights. That doesn't belong here. Latrine is that way.------>.

 

Sorry, but stomping your feet and shrieking that you want the whole world to live like you want to live is not "winning."

 

That sounds pretty funny coming from a leftist. Of course the debate was actually won with logic and facts, as opposed to tired catchphrases and arrogance.

 

Umm, the same argument applies to murderers. For someone who insults the intelligence of the opposition so often, you are not, how can I say...