A question for the American people about Russia's Ukraine invasion.

In the wake of America’s 2020 fraud presidential election, the world now finds itself on the brink of nuclear war with Russia. Numerically Russia now has more intercontinental ballistic missiles than the US though its delivery systems are inferior. The incredible ineptitude of an installed figurehead in Washington DC has demonstrated to the world that America is no longer under competent leadership and the world has come as close to a thermonuclear holocaust as it was in 1962. While professional politicians in Washington will go underground to special shelters for months stocked with fresh water, food and iodine tablets to protect from radioactive exposure, the US population will be left to itself to survive the aftermath of atomic blasts on the surface.



Are you doing anything to prepare for the possible disaster or are you satisfied that you got rid of Trump’s mean tweets and believe that the end of civilization as we know it is worth it?

 

A lot of the progressive world have been noodling the idea that there are approximately a couple billion people too many on this earth. At some point, did we not expect that at some point, those folks would try to actually do something about it? Sometimes, you just can't underestimate the evilness of folks who think they can do anything including massive genocide, to reshape the world into the image they imagine is best (well, as long as they aren't required to be a part of the genocide)...

 

I am also concerned those that make the president look weaker than he is by constantly calling him weak and perpetuating lies about him and the country. They show unwillingness to unite around our nation in a time of crisis. They have played a large part in this.

 

at some point your evangelical preachers will determine that the earth is ready for the rapture and christ's return and will "make straight the way of the lord" with thermonuclear weapons. i burn a st jude candle every week in thanks that their annointed one's tiny finger is no longer near a button.

 

I notice this hatred you have for Judeo-Christain religion. Are you an atheist?

 

To the left, getting rid of Trump is all that matters, even if it means a nuclear WWIII, which they will try to blame Trump on anyway.

 

Well, how can one respond? Sure, you changed the subject, this is call deflection. Why do you suppose that you won't simply address what the elite progressives of the world seek? I mean, you could just say you don't believe it's true, you could have said, it's a lie. But we all know those are too weak a response given the reams of published work that supports said elite's position here. So, you cry deflection, and hope it is sufficient to bait others into ignoring the fact based assessment you responded to. Nah.. not today.

 

so athiest's burn st jude candles?

i am a recovering cathaholic, but sometimes i slip.

 

i personally believe that there are far too many people in the world, but, like everyone else i know, consider birth control (including abortion), education, and eugenics as the route to lower population . we "tree huggers" want to save the planet, not destroy it.

 

In your mind, what does "save" mean exactly when it results in billions of folks having to die for it.

 

Russians arnt worried, so we're not worried.
First of all Russia doesn't have the logistics to do us harm before their entire annihilation.

What's wrong the Putin stimulus running thin?

 

Trump is irrelevant in putins decision to screw up his country.
The way things are going are the best outcome possible for the situation.

The only thing that would have prevented Putins invasion is if Ukraine never gave up their nukes.

 

Great questions that need to be asked of Brandon’s enablers/voters…

 

Not sure I would go that far .. Not that I have not had similar thoughts myself .. just that Blue "Progressive" policy is to do the opposite.

Population growth coupled with industrialization of non industrialized populations is destroying the planet .. even if one does not believe in "Global Warming" it matters not as Ocean Pollution is going to get us far quicker than Global warming. My "uber educated" estimate is that the Oceans can not sustain another 25 years of industrialization- Pop growth - like we did the last 25 years - without catastrophic damage.

Earths population was 5.7 Billion 25 years ago .. is now near 8 and is estimated to be 10 Billion by 2050 .. The massive damage that occurred over the last 25 years .. almost all of which can be attributed to industrialization of non industrialized populations .. managed to industrialize roughly 600 million. bringing the total industrialized to roughly 2 Billion. 6 Billion left to go .... going at the same rate for next 25 years will result in 7.4 Billion left to go.

So to say we have a population problem .. is a rash understatement.

Progressive Policy does nothing to address population growth .... and everything to increase industrialization of non industrialized. For those who want the math .. A subsistence dweller - bowl of rice a day - consumes at a rate of (1) and subsequent biproducts of consumption. A first world individual is at (36) .. given the numbers of unindustrialized above ... the industrialization math is scary.

What we need to be doing is to try stop growth .. never mind reducing population .. food security will help .. the solution being to give these folks a cabbage once a week .. not put a cell phone in their hand .. a refinery in their back yard.

So when we talk Keystone .. way better to produce domestically what we consume .. and what others consume .. than doing it in "Namibia"
First world nations are decreasing CO2 .. and do not dump nasties directly into the Ocean on a scale anywhere near the China's and India's of the world. Was a horrible environmental choice to block the Keystone ... and domestic production in general.

Now in terms of your initial thought .. Progressives are made up of the raging masses in general .. but these are not the folks who control what is going on. Not saying that those that do can not be progressives .. but these are two different kettles of fish. What these folks are up to I can not say.. but would be logical for these folks to wish to decrease earths population .. but to actually do it .. would not involve a war in Ukraine .. as this nation has not a population nor an industrialization problem..

 

I have some provisions for an emergency, but after an all out thermonuclear war, almost all of us would die. The blasts would wipe out a couple hundred million people, and then radiation, starvation and disease would take almost everyone else. Prepping is fine, but it has its limits.

 

Am I prepared for nuclear war? No.

Will I be intimidated into voting for anyone just to keep someone else from winning? Nope.

If you want my vote you can get it with a campaign finance reform proposal centered around public campaign funding and the elimination of PACs and super PACs. A health care proposal that is not a large slush fund for the largest insurance companies in the country, and a proposal to stop using the social security fund for discretionary spending, and subsidies.

Yes that includes taking on debt for discretionary spending and subsidies and using it to pay on the debt.

We can work on the last 2 but the campaign finance is nonegotiable.

 

We were nevert that close to a thermonuclear war to begin with. That is just sabre rattling from Putin in order to try to get his way.

Second, am I prepared for some natural disaster? Yes. Do I faith in our institutions no matter who is President? Yes.

I think what is happening is that too many people are getting confused between reality of what is going on and what they watch on YT, TV, or Internet and think those fantasies is reality.

 

billions of people die from birth control? or are you still on the "liberals want nuclear war" foolishness ?

 

Nothing you just posted is remotely accurate.

 

Courage would be a President who stood up to the weapons makers.

 

Hmm.. ok, so like communist china, are you going to force folks to limit their reproduction then? And who is supposed to enforce that? I'd suggest that given the current administrations' bungling of the Ukraine mess that it does indeed look like nuclear war seems to be a consequence they seem willing to endure. No? Show me the place where Biden has said this then. Maddie Albright most infamously said that a half million dead Iraqi kids was a bargain. What is Joe's tolerance? Hard to say. Especially when it turns out that Joe seems intricately linked to the folks who are likely behind the (as the NYTs put it) "entrenched" corruption of Ukraine. And yet, if we didn't know better, Zelensky is the very reincarnation of Batman these days. So explain it then. Where will these billions of people not happen, and when?

 

I'm just curious, but stood up to in what way? Are you asking for someone to deliver items that actually do what they are supposed to do, or did you mean something else?

 

Nah. I'm pretty sure Putin measured B and Joe last time, and still has the same opinion that led him to believe that Joe was a Chamberlain kind of guy. And Joe, to his discredit did tell Vlad that "just a little incursion" was fine. Oh, and he went on and on about how "sanctions are a deterrent",.. LMAO.. he just contradicted that either today or yesterday saying "sanctions were punishment" or some such shyte. I would point out that in a recent poll virtually all democrats said they would flee rather than defend this nation. How do you think that is being perceived?

 

2020 election got rid of Trump and it will end up getting rid of Putin.

Win/Win.

I am preparing for a global celebration.

 

people can be convinced to take off rgeir masks and not vaccinate while attending superspreader rallies, maybe people can be convinced to plan their families as well?

bit, yes, the chinese were on the right track.