A simple, hypothetical question regarding Ford and Kavanaugh

What about all of those girls and women who yell they were almost raped or were groped or were "peeped" ?

They just want the other girls to think that a man wants their bod.

Remember when there was a peeper in the Bundy's neighborhood and every woman on the block was peeped except for Peggy Bundy ?



How to handle a "Me Too" woman who wants to be peeped.

 

No, if Kavanaugh was a Democrat, he wouldn't be up for the seat.....you know, so close to the elections and all. He wouldn't even have gotten to the committee.

 

If you believe either one, you are letting your party do your thinking for you. I am not a fan of Kav, but she did not prove anything.

 

i seriously doubt someone used his name to get him in trouble. Its more plausible that she was just drunk at a party like we all have been when we where teens.. and some other drunk teen went way to far and aggressive with her and she just thinks it was Kavanaugh.

Something similar happened to me, well without the sexual assault. I was at a party and this drunk chick staggered up to me and threw her arms around me calling me Ricky and trying to make out with me. I told her my name was not Rick.. she took a step back and then staggered over to my friend "Rich" and started making out with him. lol guess she thought I looked like Rich.. I dont.. she was to drunk to even know that his name was Rich and not Rick

 

So how does this work? She's a lunatic who's lived a stable life, is a respected professor, there are no accusations by anyone around her of lunacy, and she told a therapist about this in 2012 to lay a foundation for the off-chance Kavanaugh might someday be nominated to SCOTUS?

Isn't that lunacy? Yes, yes it is.

 

People lie. Settle it with a duel at sunrise.

If either one claims to be a Christian then remind them that all liars will be barred from getting into the golden cube and that they will be tossed into the lake of fire.

Kavanaugh claims to be a Catholic. We all know they never do any wrongs.

Ford claims that she will move to New Zealand if Kavanaugh ends up on the SCOTUS. So if he does and if she don't leave the country it is the lake of fire for her.

Someone will burn. Who will it be, maybe both of them?

 

And she can't remember how she got to the party or how she got home from the party ....

But, she remembers everything in-between "100%" .....

 

She seems to remember 1-5 minutes out of the entire day. Everything else is blank.
She’s either a raging drunk, mentally incompetent or lying. Most likely all three.

 

Interesting read. Ford's yearbook tells us a lot about her.
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/09/27/blasey_ford_yearbooks.html

 

this has been my point that other posters decide to ignore.... what about this case in the media of Keith Ellison? where will that go? probably no where...

 

but it doesn't go both ways????

 

There have been multiple people confirming that Kavanaugh is a sloppy angry drunk. There have been multiple allegations against him. There's also his yearbook (do you really believe he was talking about farting?)

There is not one person who's come forward to say Ford is crazy or makes **** up about people.

 

ROFL! Credible is:

• not lying about flying; and
  
• not having all of your named witnesses, including your lifelong friend refuting your account; and
• not scrubbing all your social media prior to "a leak", even though you expected to remain anonymous; and
• not being able to say when and where a "life changing" attack occurred.... or how you got across town at 15 when you couldn't drive; and
• not waiting 36 years, and only speaking out after all the hearings and investigations were conducted; and
• not having anyone from your past standing beside you while the person you are attacking has hundreds standing beside them; and
  
• not going to politicians first, instead of law enforcement; and
  
• still not filing a police report... to this day.

Tell us all, what exactly about her testimony and account was "credible"?

 

She's a radical leftist professor in Southern California, and so she easily blends in with the crowd's academic norm and mental standard.

 

Stable? Ford testified that she was seeing a psychiatrist as a result of her anxiety attacks. Her "treatment" might have began in couple counselling 2012, but she revealed she was being treated in individual sessions too. Employed doesn't reflect ones emotional, or psychological stability. Ford's a train wreck by her own admission.

 

I notice you’re picky about who you report. There’s a 30+ page thread that needs your help! You should report that one too. Here you go:

http://politicalforum.com/index.php...onfirmed-without-an-fbi-investigation.542511/

Or do you not care? I’d believe it since you say nobody cares in the majority of your posts.

 

No it doesn't. It says a little about the school she attended. Surely you aren't trying to say that just because this, as yet unproven, yearbook mentions "parties", then it's obvious that Ford was a "partier"?

Stretch Armstrong's got nothing on you.

 

I don't care what the yearbook says. Ford's done plenty putting herself out there to show us all that she's not credible, she's not believable and she has no evidence to make her any of this. The rule of the mob has elevated somebody(Ford) to a place of somewhat national fame(even if for a very brief moment) that she doesn't deserve.

 

As a 'new' Member, I find it very frustrating that it is permissible to have multiple multiple Threads on exactly the same topic.

 

What if trumpkins are wrong about almost everything on account of being surreptitiously trained over a period of generations by an external agency to do only the external agency's bidding and are there enough busses for them to throw everyone else under?

 

Because that person would be a pariah, attacking a victim of rape....not a smart move in their culture. They could probably kiss their career goodbye, unless they’re self employed and ready for retirement.

There’s no benefit to becoming a hater individual, considering she would only be friends with other leftist feminists.

 

She may well have been molested back then but did she not know who it was until some sort of regression hypnosis was performed. How reliable can it be?

 

I think that's far fetched. I think it's much more likely she liked Kavanaugh, and he showed no interest. Something went too far with someone else, and she morphed in her mind that it wasn't the loser she let go only so far, but the accomplished legal wizard who in her mind rejected her, probably not knowing she existed. Heads are weird like that.

 

Kavanaugh didnt watch her testimony or address anything she said, other than to say that it wasn't him. He was very careful not to go after her, and portray his belief that she was a victim, of someone else.

 

If you are not sure to believe in this then how about believing in "innocent until proven guilty" and give Brett the benefit of the doubt?