Aileen Cannon begins unredacting filings against Jack Smith's demands

You mean when she used Obama's drone strike example while asking the Trump attorney if that would qualify as a prosecutable action under their ridiculous theory that the President is above the law?

 

Exactly.

 

Repub SC Robert Hur is clearly partisan yet even he detailed the differences between the cases in his report.

My post wasn't opinionated hubris, it was fact.

What’s the difference between the Trump and Biden classified documents investigations?
The Hur report said Trump’s case was different from Biden’s because the former president allegedly “obstructed justice” after being given chances to return classified documents.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/wh...lassified-documents-investigations-rcna138010

 

So what exactly is biden's excuse for having retained classified documents as a senator for many many years? Show me the law that says senators can do that

 

So you can't read where it says, Biden, when asked for the documents back promptly gave them up to the appropriate authority's.

 

Biden, when asked for the documents back promptly gave them up to the appropriate authority's.

 

Biden, took documents and had them

Trump, took documents and had them

Neither trump nor Biden are being charged with any crime because of this.

Biden, when asked for the documents back promptly gave them up to the appropriate authority's.

trump, when asked for the documents back did not give them up to the appropriate authority's but instead tried to keep them.

Biden is not being charged for keeping the documents because he gave them back when asked

trump is being charged for keeping the documents because he did not gave them back when asked

 

Taking them in the first place was illegal. Giving them back doesn't expunge that crime.

He wasn't asked for them, because no one outside his crew knew he had them.

 

Biden, took documents and had them

Trump, took documents and had them

Neither trump nor Biden are being charged with any crime because of this.

 

Trump is absolutely being charged with it...lol

I thought you dudes "read the indictments".

 

iden, when asked for the documents back promptly gave them up to the appropriate authority's.

trump, when asked for the documents back did not give them up to the appropriate authority's but instead tried to keep them.

Biden is not being charged for keeping the documents because he gave them back when asked

trump is being charged for keeping the documents because he did not gave them back when asked

 

How could Biden have been asked, when no one knew he had them?

By the same token, how did NARA know exactly how many documents Trump had?

Sounds like a frame job.

 

And VICE president Biden
And president Trump

 

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.469.0.pdf

Tell me what the title of that document is.

 

Even if that is true, who redacted it and why?

 

NARA involved the justice department within 6 months of Biden's inauguration. Much sooner than we'd been led to believe. They even acknowledged that it normally is chaotic after a one term president. But that one archivist lost patience really quickly and frankly didn't give a damn about the optics. His words.

 

He didn't.

That was easy.

 

Couldn't agree more with the bolded. It is very easy for you to tell a whopper.

 

It is the unredacted document Cannon unredacted of what Jack Smith was covering up for the Biden administration...
SEE POST #1

Do you not see the difference in what Jack Smith was trying to coverup????

 

It's easy for you to sit there and deny reality but what's not so easy is to get through to people in denial

 

Here is our chief liar doing his thing
""President Joe Biden: I have not asked for the specifics of those documents because I don't want to get myself in the middle of whether or not the Justice Department should move or not move on certain actions they could take. I-- I agreed I would not tell them what to do and not, in fact, engage in telling them how to prosecute or not.""

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/president-joe-biden-60-minutes-interview-transcript-2022-09-18/

https://twitter.com/60Minutes/statu...eaks-allegations-against-trump-011431864.html

 

Nothing like actual documents NARA and the FBI getting the request from the president Biden to attack Biden's political opponent using the " special access request " ...need for Biden to request his brown shirt jackboots to move in for the attack on his opponent...

Here are the actual documents...
https://www.archives.gov/files/foia/wall-letter-to-evan-corcoran-re-trump-boxes-05.10.2022.pdf
https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2023/nr23-013

 

We are told we are a nation of laws, but real events show that to be a falsehood. Reality shows we are a country governed by special interests, thus we are governed by a legal system that favors special interests.

 

This is true. And Biden's special interest is trying to jail Trump, rigging another election for Bribed Joe.

Biden's Outrageous Quest To Jail Trump Before the Election

'Never before has a former US president, or a leading candidate for an upcoming presidential election, faced criminal charges. There’s a good reason why America hasn’t had such a case before: seeking to jail your political opponent is generally understood to be something only banana republics do.'

'It’s also an absurd and unjust case, involving novel legal theories and obvious political intent. No one other than Donald Trump would be subject to such charges.'

'The Manhattan trial is part of the ‘lawfare’ offensive that is currently being waged by President Joe Biden and the Democrats against Trump. It is one of four criminal cases that Trump faces. He also has two federal cases, related to his handling of classified documents and to the ‘January 6’ riots, and one in Georgia, alleging that he subverted the 2020 election. These other cases are delayed, so the Manhattan case may be the only one to be tried before the November presidential election. Democrats have even tried to knock Trump off the ballot in multiple states, an anti-democratic scheme that was stymied by the Supreme Court last month.'

Good for Judge Cannon for demonstrating what a liar Lying Jack is.

 

That's kind of the opposite of the "own" that you think it is. It shows that Trump is a criminal and traitor, the likes of which the nation has never seen before, and you've sworn loyalty to the criminal and traitor.

Liberals back the rule of law. Trump cultists despise the rule of law, entirely because the rule of law puts criminals in jail, and they know they're on the side of the criminals.