Ann Coulter challenges MSNBC's Ed Schutlz

The IQ of a peanut? I've known many peanuts far more intelligent than Mr. Ed the Talking Dummie.

I thought MSNBC got rid of him long ago.

 

So the left counters with panty sniffying.

 

It's possible that after the utter fiascoes very recently of Baldwin, Bashir, and Harris-Perry the MSNBC powers that be won't want to risk letting Schultz go toe to toe against someone brilliant and biting like Coulter. It would be too easy for her to maneuver the MSNBC host into saying something that he shouldn't and then MSNBC would have yet one more public relations disaster on their hands.

 

It likely would be his biggest rated show. It depends on how much they value him compared to the almighty buck.

 

Sounds like a ratings gimmick to me.

Frankly I have no interest in what that woman says.

She's the scion of silver spoon Wall Street, the very picture of the sort of "elites" taht her audience loves to hate.

But she knows how to mouth the red meat stuff they crave. And they're too dumb to see through her act.

 

Hmmm . . . that's difficult to say really. My understanding is that MSNBC is deliberately allowed to operate at a financial loss so that it can function as an ongoing leftwing propaganda vehicle -- and God only knows what groups of people are underwriting its existence and what it's costing them. Anyway, if this is true then as long as MSNBC isn't forced to make its various celebrity hosts apologize too often or in too many group clusters per year then they can safely continue to absorb the resulting 'bad press'. What I'm getting at is that they might not want to risk him putting his foot in his mouth simply because it would be bad timing for them and not because they care about Schultz one way or the other. They can always find another no talent ideologue to ape being a pundit. Meh . . . but it might be complicated.

 

Ann 'horse face' Coulter isn't exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer; her political decisions leave a lot to be considered especially for her fellow republicans. Aside from her political convictions, she has the animation of a lawnchair and watching her on television is about as interesting as watching a fly crawl up a drape. Shultz is a completely different and more inteligent commentator; he's done a lot more with his life then his "challenger" and he's been in the trenches and a lot more qualified to speak on issues related to the working man/woman.

I would relish the opportunity to see Coulter appear on his show; he'd open her up like a can of beans.

 

She could get into a debate with a brick wall and lose

 

You've deluded yourself utterly, liberal.

But I repeat myself.

 

Why would that man go on the other man's show? The blond dude must be getting really desperate.

 

Schultz is a blowhard.

He rants at republicans but never to their face.

Coulter has nothing to fear from him.

Bui don't think he's stupid enough to accept her challenge.

 

Well, at least your loyal to her

- - - Updated - - -

Like your sidekick above at least your loyal.

 

It seems that the monkey is on Schultz's back.

It's his show and if he doesn't bring Coulter on that means Schultz got (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) whipped by the blond buzz saw.

 

"buzz saw" eh? Yapping yenta is more like it.

 

Then put your blowhard up against our yapping yenta and watch him crash and burn.

 

Sure well. Your guy is the toughest ever afraid to fight. The guy is getting owned for claiming he wants something that he doesn't actually want.

Prove me wrong.

 

I suggested to him that he takes on the yapping yenta. He makes the final decision, not me.

 

+10

Now that's funny right there. I don't care who you are.

 

Why would anyone want to be on MSNBC.....no one watches it.

 

Shultz has done a lot more with his life? Like what, a career talk show host? At least Coulter holds a Juris Doctor degree, and has more experience practicing law than the President. Of course, liberals have to keep up the attack on "stupid" conservative women, don't they?

 

Yeah but if it's a particularly good bout it could wind up on Youtube and score some hits there.

 

As a Liberal Ann Coulter and the Republicans are against the bill of rights.

 

Well you have to admit she isn't very bright. Anyone can be a fulltime student for years; still doesnt makecthem smart.

 

I believe that Ann is picking the weakest host because Schultz is a rigid liberal. I believe that the best debate would be with Maddow and Maddow has asked the same question as Schultz.

 

Full time student? She practiced law for over 10 years. That may not make her smart either but she' s done more than Shultz.