Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Arctic sea ice loss due to global warming

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by livefree, Jul 25, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 24 of 29
  1. livefree

    livefree Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    4,205
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I sure notice it. I really notice that none of the deniers can respond intelligently with any actual contrary evidence to the scientific evidence of the un-naturally rapid changes in the Arctic, like this one that I just posted, even though it bears directly on the topic of the thread. Response to it: (crickets)...

     
    livefree, Oct 2, 2011
    #576
  2. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There is no evidence of an 'abrupt alteration' in Earth's climate currently.
     
    RPA1, Oct 2, 2011
    #577
  3. livefree

    livefree Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    4,205
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I guess being in denial is sort of the definition of a 'denier'. Perhaps if you opened your eyes and looked.....like maybe at the "evidence" that convinced all of these guys.....don't be afraid, go ahead and look....the evidence that they base these conclusions on is all available.....

    The American Chemical Society stated:

    Careful and comprehensive scientific assessments have clearly demonstrated that the Earth’s climate system is changing rapidly in response to growing atmospheric burdens of greenhouse gases and absorbing aerosol particles (IPCC, 2007). There is very little room for doubt that observed climate trends are due to human activities. The threats are serious and action is urgently needed to mitigate the risks of climate change.

    The reality of global warming, its current serious and potentially disastrous impacts on Earth system properties, and the key role emissions from human activities play in driving these phenomena have been recognized by earlier versions of this ACS policy statement (ACS, 2004), by other major scientific societies, including the American Geophysical Union (AGU, 2003), the American Meteorological Society (AMS, 2007) and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS, 2007), and by the U. S. National Academies and ten other leading national academies of science (NA, 2005).

    ------- Scientific opinion on climate change
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
    livefree, Oct 3, 2011
    #578
  4. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,291
    Likes Received:
    74,542
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    I will not waste my time replying to you again as it is obvious you do not even want to debate - just deny

    Good-bye
     
    Bowerbird, Oct 3, 2011
    #579
  5. cassandrabandra

    cassandrabandra New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    16,451
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    so in other words, you think AGW is an american political discussion rather than a global issue.

    personally, I think it is important to understand it is a scientific discussion.

    only the scientifically illiterate regard it exclusively as a political issue.

    and only the really stupid think it is about american partisan politics.
     
    cassandrabandra, Oct 3, 2011
    #580
  6. cassandrabandra

    cassandrabandra New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    16,451
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    do you know what "anthropogenic" means?
     
    cassandrabandra, Oct 3, 2011
    #581
  7. bugalugs

    bugalugs Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    9,289
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who are you trying to kid?!?!?
    [​IMG]
     
    bugalugs, Oct 3, 2011
    #582
  8. bugalugs

    bugalugs Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    9,289
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sometimes I wonder how the illiterate get their hands on computers.

    Next time sonny - get your Mum or Dad to check your posts please.
     
    bugalugs, Oct 3, 2011
    #583
    Jollee and (deleted member) like this.
  9. Jollee

    Jollee New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2009
    Messages:
    6,964
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    When scientists who are paid by grants by our Government have been busted making data up to support the continuance of global warming science grants too their organization, it becomes an atrocity at the expense of real science and tax payer money... Its unfortunate but it happened... There is no denying that fact!


    Jollee:twisted:



     
    Jollee, Oct 3, 2011
    #584
    ptif219 and (deleted member) like this.
  10. cassandrabandra

    cassandrabandra New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    16,451
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    you should get your facts straight, kid.

    the REAL scientists don't dispute AGW - only the frauds do.
     
    cassandrabandra, Oct 3, 2011
    #585
  11. Jollee

    Jollee New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2009
    Messages:
    6,964
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    At least its such a money maker that they don't let any opposing scientists into the ball game as contributors, even deliberately soiling them outside forums and not allowing the opposing scientists too enter the premises.... Grant money can corrupt and should be investigated....


    Jollee:twisted:




     
    Jollee, Oct 3, 2011
    #586
  12. cassandrabandra

    cassandrabandra New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    16,451
    Likes Received:
    111
    Trophy Points:
    0
    get off the grass!

    check out some real science sites for a change!

    here - check out some of these search engines and find out what scientists have to say about issues, instead of relying on mindless uneducated bloggers who can't tell the difference between a science journal and toilet paper.

    http://www.searchengineguide.com/pages/Science/
     
    cassandrabandra, Oct 3, 2011
    #587
  13. wyly

    wyly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,857
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    113
    uneducated or more likely lacking a comprehensive education...recent study of americans found that a large number have very poor grasp of hard and soft sciences, history among other subjects...the opinion was that the educational system allowed too many to opt out of core subjects in high school and post secondary levels...so they lack critical thinking skills and a general knowledge base which would give them the tools to "connect the dots" on various issues...
     
    wyly, Oct 3, 2011
    #588
  14. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No you ignore the lies and deceptions because it shows the corruption in your beloved agenda.
     
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #589
  15. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The fact is you show nothing. You say no valid facts but show no proof. Your opinions show you can not refute the facts of my links
     
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #590
  16. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are wrong. GW scientists have to manipulate data to show what they show
     
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #591
  17. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No I show proof you refuse to address
     
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #592
  18. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Show policies that will lower temps. Obama wants E-15. That shows he is playing politics. The correct way would be E-85 which Obama ignores
     
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #593
  19. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Abrupt? 1 degree in 150 years? What we have is doom and gloom and hysteria over a small temp increase
     
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #594
  20. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The problem is you will not address the facts put before you
     
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #595
  21. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Shows you have nothing to refute what is said
     
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #596
  22. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it is political paid for by governments
     
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #597
  23. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #598
  24. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mean sites that agree with you biased opinion
     
    ptif219, Oct 3, 2011
    #599
  25. livefree

    livefree Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    4,205
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL........whew!....nine posts in a row saying nothing....just more hot air and nonsense.....pretty much equals 'troll'.....but I'm sure that comes as no surprise to anyone following the thread who has had to read through his meaningless, fact-free drivel.
     
    livefree, Oct 3, 2011
    #600
Page 24 of 29
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page