Are there any arguments against the Christchurch shooter's manifesto.

Here's a link to his manifesto.

https://milnenews.com/2019/03/15/christchurch-mosque-shooter-brenton-tarrants-full-manifesto/

My problem is that I agree with quite a lot of it. My disagreements are actually pretty pathetic, which scares me. Are we really at that point?

 

I am a white guy and I don't care if there are no more "pure" white people by the year 2100 as long as that's just a result of how people choose to breed. It's really not that big of a deal, and if you think it is then you're probably just a bigot and there's no way to reason with you.

 

His argument is not about race, but about culture.

if all you are worried about is the racial thang, then we agree. Hell, we probably all agree.

He even wrote about how he thinks the worst traitors are those who grew up in European cultures, yet chose to become Muslim.

I'm guessing you didn't read anything. Rather sad, really, considering that Europeans are a literate culture.

Maybe reading stuff isn't your forte? That's okay. I understand. This is why McDonalds has pictures to go along with their menu.

 

But is it simply "a result of how people choose to breed"?

Do you think Asians, Africans, Arabs, and Hispanics think it'd be "no big deal" for their own? Be consistent, call them bigots at the next possible opportunity.

 

How is it not?

I'm sure there are many within those demographics who would prefer to maintain the purity of their race. But how can I call them bigots if I don't know who among them feels that way?

 

well, that's your idea. I linked to the guy's manifesto, and you chose to ignore it. Now you're going on about your business as if your ignorance on the subject (it's not that bloody long!!!) is a perfectly reasonable explanation for why you are trying to change the topic to something you are far more comfortable with, such as racism.

 

He's not talking about demographics as a result of mixed couples procreating.

The question isn't how you'd know a 'non-white' bigot, the question is if you'd actually be bothered, let alone enough to say something.

 

Fewer “white” people means less melanoma

That’s a win in my book!

 

More the merrier!!!

It is fun living with multiculturalism

 

Sounds like you missed the part where he openly states that he's a racist and that his attack is racially motivated.

And yes, I read all of his manifesto.

He's right on 1% which is that demographic replacement is a problem. He's wrong on literally everything else.

People "at that point" of seeing people who think violence against innocents helps their cause as anything else than delusional scum are beyond help.

 

It also means the chubbier white chicks will likely end up being left to hook up with African dudes.

There's no equality in the interracial dating game.

(And as these White women learn, the African players are, as a general rule, not very good in the monogamy department)

 

That's quite calloused and nonchalant.

Less black people means less sickle cell. Winning!

 

I'm willing to read any C&P you have of that.

 

I wouldn't feel bad. From what I've read of your replies you're a pretty laid back "let it be" Conservative. Definitely not as to the right as several other members here.

I think your position is probably actually very moderate. (But don't ask the opinion of our members to the Left on that)

There's no necessary connection between the political/social opinions of somebody and whether those opinions led them to commit evil and murder. (Isn't this what the Left is always saying about Islam?)
You'd have to be an apathetic moderate for that not to be the case.

I wouldn't let yourself be guilt tripped.
(You're not arguing for anyone to be murdered)

 

Are you aware sickle cell makes you immune to Malaria? An it is found in India as well?

 

Oh fun, you don't die due to malaria, you die due to your veins clotting up.

 

No matter. I think you're perfectly aware of how insensitive and racist something like that sounds.

Why are you okay with double standards?

 

That is the 64,000 dollar question, isn't it?

 

Melanoma must be the number one human problem globally. Has to be.

 

Progressives could do so much more good if they took their ideas and applied them in other poorer parts of the world where people so desperately need them.

 

Nope but it is here in QLD

 

What like vaccination?

Been there done that

Universal health care

Working on it

Development of new industries?

Where did you say your jobs had gone again?

 

No, I'm not arguing with that. Just that I read his manifesto and it's a bit disconcerting that I find myself agreeing with much of it. He's not a stupid man.

 

Probably stole his ideas from others brighter than himself.

 

That he's a mass murdering nutcase?