Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Are you for or against corporate marriage?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Agent Zero, Dec 7, 2011.

?

For or against?

  1. Yes, I am for corporate marriage

    9 vote(s)
    52.9%

  2. No, I am against corporate marriage

    5 vote(s)
    29.4%

  3. I dunno

    3 vote(s)
    17.6%
Page 1 of 3
  1. Agent Zero

    Agent Zero New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Messages:
    15,298
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you for or against corporate marriage? Are you for, for example, GE marrying that whore ExxonMobile?
     
    Agent Zero, Dec 7, 2011
    #1
  2. Black Monarch

    Black Monarch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joke answer: Exxon and Mobil are already married to each other, and allowing GE to join them would be polygamy, which is a strict no-no.

    Serious answer: corporate marriages already exist. We call them "mergers".
     
    Black Monarch, Dec 8, 2011
    #2
  3. Awryly

    Awryly New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2010
    Messages:
    15,259
    Likes Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I call them gay unions.

    Very gay.
     
    Awryly, Dec 8, 2011
    #3
  4. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no its too big to fail marrying another too big to fail to make a really fat corporate kingdom where wealth is concentrated among fat republican bosses
     
    liberalminority, Dec 8, 2011
    #4
  5. Roelath

    Roelath Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,103
    Likes Received:
    257
    Trophy Points:
    83
    [​IMG]
     
    Roelath, Dec 8, 2011
    #5
  6. Black Monarch

    Black Monarch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]
     
    Black Monarch, Dec 8, 2011
    #6
  7. Agent Zero

    Agent Zero New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Messages:
    15,298
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Calling it a "merger" is really insensitive IMO. They are both people so I figure we should call it marriage.
     
    Agent Zero, Dec 8, 2011
    #7
  8. Black Monarch

    Black Monarch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, the Bible doesn't state that homo-corporality is a sin...

    [​IMG]
     
    Black Monarch, Dec 8, 2011
    #8
  9. Daybreaker

    Daybreaker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2007
    Messages:
    17,158
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    63
    This is my new favorite thread.
     
    Daybreaker, Dec 8, 2011
    #9
  10. Subdermal

    Subdermal Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    12,185
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ^^^this.

    /thread
     
    Subdermal, Dec 8, 2011
    #10
  11. Ethereal

    Ethereal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    40,617
    Likes Received:
    5,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They aren't people. Only ignorant liberals think that.
     
    Ethereal, Dec 8, 2011
    #11
  12. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    corporations are people only when its time to receive campaign money

    that is what the supreme court ruled
     
    liberalminority, Dec 8, 2011
    #12
  13. Ethereal

    Ethereal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    40,617
    Likes Received:
    5,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Like I said, only ignorant liberals think that...
     
    Ethereal, Dec 8, 2011
    #13
  14. perdidochas

    perdidochas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,293
    Likes Received:
    4,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm all for it. I wish that AT&T would marry T-Mobile.....
     
    perdidochas, Dec 8, 2011
    #14
  15. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm more concern about corporate slavery. Corporations own other corporations and that needs to stop right now. It violates the 14th Amendment.
     
    Questerr, Dec 8, 2011
    #15
  16. Agent Zero

    Agent Zero New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    Messages:
    15,298
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But they are people according to the Supreme Court. It's very insensitive to assert that people aren't actually people.
     
    Agent Zero, Dec 8, 2011
    #16
  17. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    51,833
    Likes Received:
    23,073
    Trophy Points:
    113

    But I'm in favor of people owning corporations.

    but as far as marriage I guess I'm a traditionalist. Although I'm in favor of ghost-horse marriages, I'm strongly opposed to robo-sexual marrage.

    Lets put robosexuality back in the closet.
     
    Lil Mike, Dec 8, 2011
    #17
  18. Ethereal

    Ethereal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    40,617
    Likes Received:
    5,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Show me the exact language of the Court's majority opinion which states "corporations are people".
     
    Ethereal, Dec 8, 2011
    #18
  19. NotDependant

    NotDependant New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2011
    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why does everyone take this as a joke?
    BugerKing and DairyQueen have been married for years.
     
    NotDependant, Dec 8, 2011
    #19
  20. Subdermal

    Subdermal Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    12,185
    Likes Received:
    415
    Trophy Points:
    0
    BoogerKing?

    No wonder McDonald's is kicking their ass.

    :mrgreen:
     
    Subdermal, Dec 8, 2011
    #20
  21. Black Monarch

    Black Monarch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No it doesn't. It violates the 13th Amendment. The 14th is the one that makes them citizens, and thus eligible to vote and run for office (though corporations founded in foreign countries can't be President).
     
    Black Monarch, Dec 8, 2011
    #21
  22. Questerr

    Questerr Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    63,174
    Likes Received:
    4,995
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How can people own corporations. Corporations are people and people owning people is illegal.
     
    Questerr, Dec 8, 2011
    #22
  23. Black Monarch

    Black Monarch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's only illegal if you own the whole person. Owning a "share" in a person is totally fine, because then no one owner is responsible for the suffering of the owned person.
     
    Black Monarch, Dec 8, 2011
    #23
  24. speedingtime

    speedingtime Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Messages:
    1,220
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm fairly certain this is is against some part of the bible.
     
    speedingtime, Dec 8, 2011
    #24
  25. Black Monarch

    Black Monarch New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,213
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If we allow it, will we have to allow marriages between a corporation and an unincorporated person? That just seems extremely unnatural. A marriage is a sacred union of one corporation and another corporation!
     
    Black Monarch, Dec 8, 2011
    #25
Page 1 of 3

Share This Page